Peek
Played in 2,483 Dimir decks
Color Identity Spread
13.9% Dimir
- Blue 4,991 · 27.9%
- Izzet 4,516 · 25.2%
- Dimir 2,483 · 13.9%
- Jeskai 1,671 · 9.3%
- Grixis 1,591 · 8.9%
- Azorius 1,068 · 6.0%
- Other (15) 1,566 · 8.8%
All commanders (30)
- Lord of the Nazgûl relevance 3.85 · 17.4% (1,478 of 8,476 decks)
- Nebuchadnezzar relevance 3.61 · 53.9% (137 of 254 decks)
- Circu, Dimir Lobotomist relevance 1.98 · 13.8% (58 of 421 decks)
- Rona, Sheoldred's Faithful relevance 1.63 · 11.9% (33 of 277 decks)
- Alela, Cunning Conqueror relevance 1.47 · 3.2% (326 of 10,180 decks)
- X relevance 1.26 · 13.0% (13 of 100 decks)
- Ertai Resurrected relevance 1.20 · 6.2% (29 of 470 decks)
- Nymris, Oona's Trickster relevance 1.18 · 5.0% (40 of 808 decks)
- Lazav, Familiar Stranger relevance 1.01 · 4.3% (29 of 672 decks)
- Scion of Halaster // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.92 · 2.8% (49 of 1,762 decks)
- Oura, the Imitator relevance 0.50 · 11.8% (2 of 17 decks)
- Vohar, Vodalian Desecrator relevance 0.39 · 1.4% (12 of 869 decks)
- Xanathar, Guild Kingpin relevance 0.34 · 1.1% (14 of 1,314 decks)
- Alora, Merry Thief // Agent of the Shadow Thieves relevance 0.34 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Francisco, Fowl Marauder // Siani, Eye of the Storm relevance 0.33 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Xande, Dark Mage relevance 0.30 · 1.9% (4 of 210 decks)
- Inquisitor Eisenhorn relevance 0.28 · 1.2% (7 of 594 decks)
- Princess Lucrezia relevance 0.24 · 5.9% (1 of 17 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Glacian, Powerstone Engineer relevance 0.22 · 4.8% (1 of 21 decks)
- Falthis, Shadowcat Familiar // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.20 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Ramirez DePietro relevance 0.19 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Vhal, Candlekeep Researcher // Agent of the Shadow Thieves relevance 0.16 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Kang, Temporal Tyrant relevance 0.14 · 1.1% (2 of 187 decks)
- Shadowheart, Dark Justiciar // Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (1 of 51 decks)
- Falthis, Shadowcat Familiar // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.12 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept relevance 0.12 · 1.6% (1 of 62 decks)
- Ghost, Spectral Saboteur relevance 0.11 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Kotose, the Silent Spider relevance 0.11 · 1.4% (1 of 70 decks)
- Locke Cole relevance 0.09 · 1.2% (1 of 86 decks)
- Zareth San, the Trickster relevance 0.08 · 1.0% (1 of 99 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Opt relevance 1.68 · 74.2% (1,843 of 2,483 decks)
- Birthday Escape relevance 1.64 · 45.5% (1,130 of 2,483 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 1.60 · 51.8% (1,287 of 2,483 decks)
- Nazgûl relevance 1.48 · 43.2% (1,072 of 2,483 decks)
- Consider relevance 1.47 · 70.5% (1,750 of 2,483 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 1.45 · 46.0% (1,142 of 2,483 decks)
- Cremate relevance 1.41 · 28.9% (717 of 2,483 decks)
- Call of the Ring relevance 1.27 · 36.8% (913 of 2,483 decks)
- Preordain relevance 1.26 · 55.3% (1,373 of 2,483 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 1.26 · 38.4% (953 of 2,483 decks)
- Snap relevance 1.18 · 50.7% (1,260 of 2,483 decks)
- Ringsight relevance 1.18 · 38.8% (963 of 2,483 decks)
- Soothing of Sméagol relevance 1.16 · 28.8% (715 of 2,483 decks)
- Witch-king of Angmar relevance 1.12 · 30.6% (760 of 2,483 decks)
- Sam's Desperate Rescue relevance 1.06 · 26.8% (666 of 2,483 decks)
- Shadow Rift relevance 1.06 · 22.6% (560 of 2,483 decks)
- Glorious Gale relevance 1.04 · 25.4% (631 of 2,483 decks)
- Aphotic Wisps relevance 1.01 · 18.8% (468 of 2,483 decks)
- Ponder relevance 1.00 · 54.1% (1,343 of 2,483 decks)
- Quicken relevance 0.93 · 17.7% (439 of 2,483 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.93 · 33.1% (821 of 2,483 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.93 · 71.7% (1,781 of 2,483 decks)
- Wavebreak Hippocamp relevance 0.92 · 27.1% (673 of 2,483 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.91 · 23.4% (580 of 2,483 decks)
- Claim the Precious relevance 0.90 · 22.0% (547 of 2,483 decks)
- Ringwraiths relevance 0.89 · 21.8% (542 of 2,483 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.88 · 53.5% (1,328 of 2,483 decks)
- Raise the Palisade relevance 0.87 · 29.5% (732 of 2,483 decks)
- Gandalf, Friend of the Shire relevance 0.87 · 20.6% (512 of 2,483 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.87 · 38.2% (948 of 2,483 decks)
All creatures (12)
- Nazgûl relevance 1.48 · 43.2% (1,072 of 2,483 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 1.45 · 46.0% (1,142 of 2,483 decks)
- Witch-king of Angmar relevance 1.12 · 30.6% (760 of 2,483 decks)
- Wavebreak Hippocamp relevance 0.92 · 27.1% (673 of 2,483 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.91 · 23.4% (580 of 2,483 decks)
- Ringwraiths relevance 0.89 · 21.8% (542 of 2,483 decks)
- Gandalf, Friend of the Shire relevance 0.87 · 20.6% (512 of 2,483 decks)
- Witch-king, Bringer of Ruin relevance 0.84 · 20.3% (505 of 2,483 decks)
- Archmage of Runes relevance 0.83 · 20.8% (517 of 2,483 decks)
- Gríma, Saruman's Footman relevance 0.71 · 20.0% (496 of 2,483 decks)
- Ojer Pakpatiq, Deepest Epoch // Temple of Cyclical Time relevance 0.71 · 14.8% (368 of 2,483 decks)
- Sauron, the Necromancer relevance 0.63 · 14.3% (354 of 2,483 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Inherited Envelope relevance 0.62 · 13.8% (342 of 2,483 decks)
- Glamdring relevance 0.61 · 12.7% (316 of 2,483 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Call of the Ring relevance 1.27 · 36.8% (913 of 2,483 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.66 · 31.4% (780 of 2,483 decks)
All instants (23)
- Opt relevance 1.68 · 74.2% (1,843 of 2,483 decks)
- Consider relevance 1.47 · 70.5% (1,750 of 2,483 decks)
- Cremate relevance 1.41 · 28.9% (717 of 2,483 decks)
- Snap relevance 1.18 · 50.7% (1,260 of 2,483 decks)
- Soothing of Sméagol relevance 1.16 · 28.8% (715 of 2,483 decks)
- Shadow Rift relevance 1.06 · 22.6% (560 of 2,483 decks)
- Glorious Gale relevance 1.04 · 25.4% (631 of 2,483 decks)
- Aphotic Wisps relevance 1.01 · 18.8% (468 of 2,483 decks)
- Quicken relevance 0.93 · 17.7% (439 of 2,483 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.93 · 33.1% (821 of 2,483 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.93 · 71.7% (1,781 of 2,483 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.88 · 53.5% (1,328 of 2,483 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.87 · 38.2% (948 of 2,483 decks)
- Sauron's Ransom relevance 0.85 · 21.0% (522 of 2,483 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.85 · 44.3% (1,099 of 2,483 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.74 · 17.4% (433 of 2,483 decks)
- Unwind relevance 0.69 · 20.5% (508 of 2,483 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.67 · 48.8% (1,212 of 2,483 decks)
- Leap relevance 0.66 · 11.4% (284 of 2,483 decks)
- Infernal Grasp relevance 0.63 · 32.7% (812 of 2,483 decks)
- Go for the Throat relevance 0.62 · 31.4% (780 of 2,483 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.61 · 37.8% (939 of 2,483 decks)
- Village Rites relevance 0.61 · 21.4% (531 of 2,483 decks)
All sorceries (10)
- Birthday Escape relevance 1.64 · 45.5% (1,130 of 2,483 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 1.60 · 51.8% (1,287 of 2,483 decks)
- Preordain relevance 1.26 · 55.3% (1,373 of 2,483 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 1.26 · 38.4% (953 of 2,483 decks)
- Ringsight relevance 1.18 · 38.8% (963 of 2,483 decks)
- Sam's Desperate Rescue relevance 1.06 · 26.8% (666 of 2,483 decks)
- Ponder relevance 1.00 · 54.1% (1,343 of 2,483 decks)
- Claim the Precious relevance 0.90 · 22.0% (547 of 2,483 decks)
- Raise the Palisade relevance 0.87 · 29.5% (732 of 2,483 decks)
- Night's Whisper relevance 0.77 · 28.7% (712 of 2,483 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Minas Morgul, Dark Fortress relevance 0.68 · 19.0% (473 of 2,483 decks)
EDH data for Peek: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 2,483 real decks.