130+15+6+5+11+6+4+3+
Color Identity Spread
10.5% Simic
Commanders
Most Relevant
Obelisk of Urd 78.0% of decks
Obelisk of Urd 78.0% of decks
Painter's Servant 85.4% of decks
Painter's Servant 85.4% of decks
Luxior, Giada's Gift 80.5% of decks
Luxior, Giada's Gift 80.5% of decks
Adaptive Automaton 85.4% of decks
Adaptive Automaton 85.4% of decks
Paradox Haze 80.5% of decks
Paradox Haze 80.5% of decks
Wrap in Vigor 80.5% of decks
Wrap in Vigor 80.5% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Pippa, Duchess of Dice relevance 1.90 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Obelisk of Urd relevance 4.95 · 78.0% (32 of 41 decks)
- Painter's Servant relevance 4.87 · 85.4% (35 of 41 decks)
- Luxior, Giada's Gift relevance 4.85 · 80.5% (33 of 41 decks)
- Adaptive Automaton relevance 4.72 · 85.4% (35 of 41 decks)
- Paradox Haze relevance 4.66 · 80.5% (33 of 41 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 3.74 · 80.5% (33 of 41 decks)
- For the Common Good relevance 3.64 · 85.4% (35 of 41 decks)
- Royal Treatment relevance 3.44 · 80.5% (33 of 41 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 3.42 · 80.5% (33 of 41 decks)
- Biovisionary relevance 3.30 · 87.8% (36 of 41 decks)
- Inga and Esika relevance 3.24 · 78.0% (32 of 41 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 3.14 · 82.9% (34 of 41 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 3.14 · 85.4% (35 of 41 decks)
- Heraldic Banner relevance 3.11 · 53.7% (22 of 41 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 3.07 · 85.4% (35 of 41 decks)
- Emil, Vastlands Roamer relevance 3.04 · 78.0% (32 of 41 decks)
- Transcendent Message relevance 2.98 · 53.7% (22 of 41 decks)
- Aggressive Biomancy relevance 2.89 · 87.8% (36 of 41 decks)
- Shared Summons relevance 2.87 · 65.9% (27 of 41 decks)
- Applied Geometry relevance 2.86 · 78.0% (32 of 41 decks)
- Kruphix, God of Horizons relevance 2.82 · 65.9% (27 of 41 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 2.74 · 80.5% (33 of 41 decks)
- Momir Vig, Simic Visionary relevance 2.73 · 58.5% (24 of 41 decks)
- Second Harvest relevance 2.61 · 90.2% (37 of 41 decks)
- Embrace the Paradox relevance 2.59 · 78.0% (32 of 41 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 2.58 · 85.4% (35 of 41 decks)
- Parallel Lives relevance 2.56 · 87.8% (36 of 41 decks)
- Junk Winder relevance 2.56 · 85.4% (35 of 41 decks)
- Combine Chrysalis relevance 2.55 · 75.6% (31 of 41 decks)
- Fanatic of Rhonas relevance 2.55 · 85.4% (35 of 41 decks)
All creatures (15)
- Painter's Servant relevance 4.87 · 85.4% (35 of 41 decks)
- Adaptive Automaton relevance 4.72 · 85.4% (35 of 41 decks)
- Biovisionary relevance 3.30 · 87.8% (36 of 41 decks)
- Inga and Esika relevance 3.24 · 78.0% (32 of 41 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 3.14 · 82.9% (34 of 41 decks)
- Emil, Vastlands Roamer relevance 3.04 · 78.0% (32 of 41 decks)
- Kruphix, God of Horizons relevance 2.82 · 65.9% (27 of 41 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 2.74 · 80.5% (33 of 41 decks)
- Momir Vig, Simic Visionary relevance 2.73 · 58.5% (24 of 41 decks)
- Junk Winder relevance 2.56 · 85.4% (35 of 41 decks)
- Fanatic of Rhonas relevance 2.55 · 85.4% (35 of 41 decks)
- Adrix and Nev, Twincasters relevance 2.16 · 87.8% (36 of 41 decks)
- Koma, World-Eater relevance 2.03 · 87.8% (36 of 41 decks)
- Murkfiend Liege relevance 1.98 · 87.8% (36 of 41 decks)
- Nyxbloom Ancient relevance 1.90 · 68.3% (28 of 41 decks)
All artifacts (6)
- Obelisk of Urd relevance 4.95 · 78.0% (32 of 41 decks)
- Luxior, Giada's Gift relevance 4.85 · 80.5% (33 of 41 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 3.14 · 85.4% (35 of 41 decks)
- Heraldic Banner relevance 3.11 · 53.7% (22 of 41 decks)
- Combine Chrysalis relevance 2.55 · 75.6% (31 of 41 decks)
- Throne of the God-Pharaoh relevance 2.52 · 43.9% (18 of 41 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Paradox Haze relevance 4.66 · 80.5% (33 of 41 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 3.07 · 85.4% (35 of 41 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 2.58 · 85.4% (35 of 41 decks)
- Parallel Lives relevance 2.56 · 87.8% (36 of 41 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 2.07 · 85.4% (35 of 41 decks)
All instants (11)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 3.74 · 80.5% (33 of 41 decks)
- Royal Treatment relevance 3.44 · 80.5% (33 of 41 decks)
- Transcendent Message relevance 2.98 · 53.7% (22 of 41 decks)
- Shared Summons relevance 2.87 · 65.9% (27 of 41 decks)
- Second Harvest relevance 2.61 · 90.2% (37 of 41 decks)
- Embrace the Paradox relevance 2.59 · 78.0% (32 of 41 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 2.54 · 63.4% (26 of 41 decks)
- Quandrix Charm relevance 2.33 · 85.4% (35 of 41 decks)
- Decisive Denial relevance 2.16 · 85.4% (35 of 41 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 2.04 · 80.5% (33 of 41 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 2.01 · 80.5% (33 of 41 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- For the Common Good relevance 3.64 · 85.4% (35 of 41 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 3.42 · 80.5% (33 of 41 decks)
- Aggressive Biomancy relevance 2.89 · 87.8% (36 of 41 decks)
- Applied Geometry relevance 2.86 · 78.0% (32 of 41 decks)
- Mind into Matter relevance 2.31 · 78.0% (32 of 41 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 2.25 · 80.5% (33 of 41 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Paradox Gardens relevance 2.32 · 80.5% (33 of 41 decks)
- Fountainport relevance 2.19 · 48.8% (20 of 41 decks)
- Khalni Garden relevance 2.08 · 43.9% (18 of 41 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 1.98 · 85.4% (35 of 41 decks)
All lands (3)
- Thriving Grove relevance 3.32 · 85.4% (35 of 41 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 3.23 · 85.4% (35 of 41 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 2.63 · 85.4% (35 of 41 decks)
EDH data for Johnny, Combo Player: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 41 real decks.














































