Cryogenic Stasis
Played in 24 Blue decks
2
Showing 1-2 of 2
Page size
All commanders (2)
- Lulu, Stern Guardian relevance 1.91 · 1.3% (9 of 670 decks)
- Valeria Richards, Precocious relevance 1.11 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
8
Showing 1-8 of 8
Page size
1.40 41.7%$2.89 €3.23
1.38 37.5%$0.56 €0.46
1.32 33.3%$0.20 €0.11
1.09 33.3%$0.35 €0.42
1.01 33.3%$3.90 €3.19
0.80 41.7%$0.30 €0.67
0.56 37.5%$0.25 €0.20
0.41 33.3%$2.84 €2.24
All most relevant (8)
- Dreamtide Whale relevance 1.40 · 41.7% (10 of 24 decks)
- Prologue to Phyresis relevance 1.38 · 37.5% (9 of 24 decks)
- Deliberate relevance 1.32 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 1.09 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
- Malcolm, Alluring Scoundrel relevance 1.01 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.80 · 41.7% (10 of 24 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.56 · 37.5% (9 of 24 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.41 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
2
Showing 1-2 of 2
Page size
- 1.40 41.7%$2.89 €3.23
- 1.01 33.3%$3.90 €3.19
All creatures (2)
- Dreamtide Whale relevance 1.40 · 41.7% (10 of 24 decks)
- Malcolm, Alluring Scoundrel relevance 1.01 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
1
Showing 1-1 of 1
Page size
- 0.41 33.3%$2.84 €2.24
All enchantments (1)
- Propaganda relevance 0.41 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
4
Showing 1-4 of 4
Page size
- 1.38 37.5%$0.56 €0.46
- 1.32 33.3%$0.20 €0.11
- 0.80 41.7%$0.30 €0.67
- 0.56 37.5%$0.25 €0.20
All instants (4)
- Prologue to Phyresis relevance 1.38 · 37.5% (9 of 24 decks)
- Deliberate relevance 1.32 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.80 · 41.7% (10 of 24 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.56 · 37.5% (9 of 24 decks)
1
Showing 1-1 of 1
Page size
- 1.09 33.3%$0.35 €0.42
All sorceries (1)
- Contentious Plan relevance 1.09 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
EDH data for Cryogenic Stasis: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 24 real decks.