Murktide Regent
Played in 160 Azorius decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (7)
- Taigam, Ojutai Master relevance 2.06 · 2.9% (22 of 771 decks)
- Renari, Merchant of Marvels // Folk Hero relevance 1.08 · 5.6% (3 of 54 decks)
- Dragonlord Ojutai relevance 1.00 · 1.1% (7 of 663 decks)
- Noble Heritage // Renari, Merchant of Marvels relevance 0.68 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Ojutai, Soul of Winter relevance 0.68 · 2.3% (2 of 87 decks)
- Bard the Bowman relevance 0.53 · 1.1% (2 of 184 decks)
- Noble Heritage // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.43 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Scalelord Reckoner relevance 1.65 · 25.0% (40 of 160 decks)
- Ancient Silver Dragon relevance 1.48 · 33.1% (53 of 160 decks)
- Iymrith, Desert Doom relevance 1.44 · 25.6% (41 of 160 decks)
- Ancient Gold Dragon relevance 1.38 · 31.3% (50 of 160 decks)
- Dragonlord Ojutai relevance 1.33 · 28.1% (45 of 160 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 1.31 · 38.1% (61 of 160 decks)
- Marang River Regent // Coil and Catch relevance 1.29 · 27.5% (44 of 160 decks)
- Kairi, the Swirling Sky relevance 1.29 · 22.5% (36 of 160 decks)
- Hammerhead Tyrant relevance 1.27 · 20.6% (33 of 160 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 1.26 · 34.4% (55 of 160 decks)
- Astral Dragon relevance 1.17 · 23.8% (38 of 160 decks)
- Sword Coast Serpent // Capsizing Wave relevance 1.16 · 18.8% (30 of 160 decks)
- Lapis Orb of Dragonkind relevance 1.13 · 16.9% (27 of 160 decks)
- Subtlety relevance 1.12 · 26.3% (42 of 160 decks)
- Sapphire Dragon // Psionic Pulse relevance 1.11 · 20.6% (33 of 160 decks)
- Ojutai, Soul of Winter relevance 1.11 · 20.0% (32 of 160 decks)
- Yosei, the Morning Star relevance 1.10 · 18.1% (29 of 160 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 1.10 · 30.6% (49 of 160 decks)
- Brazen Borrower // Petty Theft relevance 1.07 · 21.9% (35 of 160 decks)
- Dragonologist relevance 1.07 · 16.9% (27 of 160 decks)
- Deceptive Frostkite relevance 1.06 · 16.9% (27 of 160 decks)
- The Wandering Emperor relevance 1.05 · 21.9% (35 of 160 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 1.05 · 29.4% (47 of 160 decks)
- True-Name Nemesis relevance 1.04 · 18.1% (29 of 160 decks)
- Scion of Draco relevance 1.04 · 15.0% (24 of 160 decks)
- Crystal Dragon // Rob the Hoard relevance 1.03 · 16.9% (27 of 160 decks)
- Hraesvelgr of the First Brood relevance 0.99 · 19.4% (31 of 160 decks)
- Clarion Conqueror relevance 0.99 · 19.4% (31 of 160 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.99 · 57.5% (92 of 160 decks)
- Guardian Scalelord relevance 0.99 · 17.5% (28 of 160 decks)
All creatures (35)
- Scalelord Reckoner relevance 1.65 · 25.0% (40 of 160 decks)
- Ancient Silver Dragon relevance 1.48 · 33.1% (53 of 160 decks)
- Iymrith, Desert Doom relevance 1.44 · 25.6% (41 of 160 decks)
- Ancient Gold Dragon relevance 1.38 · 31.3% (50 of 160 decks)
- Dragonlord Ojutai relevance 1.33 · 28.1% (45 of 160 decks)
- Marang River Regent // Coil and Catch relevance 1.29 · 27.5% (44 of 160 decks)
- Kairi, the Swirling Sky relevance 1.29 · 22.5% (36 of 160 decks)
- Hammerhead Tyrant relevance 1.27 · 20.6% (33 of 160 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 1.26 · 34.4% (55 of 160 decks)
- Astral Dragon relevance 1.17 · 23.8% (38 of 160 decks)
- Sword Coast Serpent // Capsizing Wave relevance 1.16 · 18.8% (30 of 160 decks)
- Subtlety relevance 1.12 · 26.3% (42 of 160 decks)
- Sapphire Dragon // Psionic Pulse relevance 1.11 · 20.6% (33 of 160 decks)
- Ojutai, Soul of Winter relevance 1.11 · 20.0% (32 of 160 decks)
- Yosei, the Morning Star relevance 1.10 · 18.1% (29 of 160 decks)
- Brazen Borrower // Petty Theft relevance 1.07 · 21.9% (35 of 160 decks)
- Dragonologist relevance 1.07 · 16.9% (27 of 160 decks)
- Deceptive Frostkite relevance 1.06 · 16.9% (27 of 160 decks)
- True-Name Nemesis relevance 1.04 · 18.1% (29 of 160 decks)
- Scion of Draco relevance 1.04 · 15.0% (24 of 160 decks)
- Crystal Dragon // Rob the Hoard relevance 1.03 · 16.9% (27 of 160 decks)
- Hraesvelgr of the First Brood relevance 0.99 · 19.4% (31 of 160 decks)
- Clarion Conqueror relevance 0.99 · 19.4% (31 of 160 decks)
- Guardian Scalelord relevance 0.99 · 17.5% (28 of 160 decks)
- Ao, the Dawn Sky relevance 0.97 · 18.8% (30 of 160 decks)
- Keiga, the Tide Star relevance 0.95 · 15.6% (25 of 160 decks)
- Sunscorch Regent relevance 0.95 · 21.3% (34 of 160 decks)
- Timeless Dragon relevance 0.94 · 15.6% (25 of 160 decks)
- Octavia, Living Thesis relevance 0.94 · 16.9% (27 of 160 decks)
- Pristine Skywise relevance 0.94 · 14.4% (23 of 160 decks)
- Voracious Bibliophile relevance 0.93 · 15.0% (24 of 160 decks)
- Transcendent Dragon relevance 0.92 · 16.9% (27 of 160 decks)
- Dragon Turtle relevance 0.91 · 15.0% (24 of 160 decks)
- Solitude relevance 0.90 · 25.6% (41 of 160 decks)
- Abhorrent Oculus relevance 0.90 · 15.6% (25 of 160 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Lapis Orb of Dragonkind relevance 1.13 · 16.9% (27 of 160 decks)
- Dragon's Hoard relevance 0.94 · 15.0% (24 of 160 decks)
All instants (4)
- Dig Through Time relevance 1.31 · 38.1% (61 of 160 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.99 · 57.5% (92 of 160 decks)
- Memory Deluge relevance 0.94 · 19.4% (31 of 160 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.90 · 36.3% (58 of 160 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 1.10 · 30.6% (49 of 160 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 1.05 · 29.4% (47 of 160 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.98 · 46.3% (74 of 160 decks)
- Temporal Trespass relevance 0.97 · 18.8% (30 of 160 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.91 · 20.6% (33 of 160 decks)
- Mass Diminish relevance 0.90 · 13.1% (21 of 160 decks)
All planeswalkers (2)
- The Wandering Emperor relevance 1.05 · 21.9% (35 of 160 decks)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.97 · 21.9% (35 of 160 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Maelstrom of the Spirit Dragon relevance 1.02 · 15.0% (24 of 160 decks)
EDH data for Murktide Regent: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 160 real decks.