Hold the Gates
Played in 88 Ink-Treader decks
127+9+3+5+10+7+16+
Color Identity Spread
3.9% Ink-Treader
-
Five-Color 1,125 · 50.3%
-
Bant 314 · 14.0%
-
Abzan 264 · 11.8%
-
Ink-Treader 88 · 3.9%
-
Azorius 79 · 3.5%
-
White 48 · 2.1%
- Other (12) 318 · 14.2%
Commanders
Most Relevant
Open the Gates 72.7% of decks
Open the Gates 72.7% of decks
Guild Summit 63.6% of decks
Guild Summit 63.6% of decks
Gatecreeper Vine 63.6% of decks
Gatecreeper Vine 63.6% of decks
Navigation Orb 56.8% of decks
Navigation Orb 56.8% of decks
Circuitous Route 77.3% of decks
Circuitous Route 77.3% of decks
District Guide 50.0% of decks
District Guide 50.0% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist relevance 0.39 · 1.0% (2 of 198 decks)
All most relevant (27)
- Open the Gates relevance 3.41 · 72.7% (64 of 88 decks)
- Guild Summit relevance 3.37 · 63.6% (56 of 88 decks)
- Gatecreeper Vine relevance 3.29 · 63.6% (56 of 88 decks)
- Navigation Orb relevance 2.90 · 56.8% (50 of 88 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 2.78 · 77.3% (68 of 88 decks)
- District Guide relevance 2.76 · 50.0% (44 of 88 decks)
- Gates Ablaze relevance 2.64 · 44.3% (39 of 88 decks)
- Explore the Underdark relevance 2.56 · 50.0% (44 of 88 decks)
- Sage of the Maze relevance 2.49 · 45.5% (40 of 88 decks)
- Crackling Perimeter relevance 2.14 · 33.0% (29 of 88 decks)
- Gatebreaker Ram relevance 2.09 · 33.0% (29 of 88 decks)
- Gate Colossus relevance 1.98 · 30.7% (27 of 88 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 1.46 · 37.5% (33 of 88 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.23 · 33.0% (29 of 88 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 1.18 · 42.0% (37 of 88 decks)
- Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 1.04 · 18.2% (16 of 88 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 1.02 · 21.6% (19 of 88 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 1.02 · 29.5% (26 of 88 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.88 · 45.5% (40 of 88 decks)
- Assault Formation relevance 0.80 · 15.9% (14 of 88 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.79 · 14.8% (13 of 88 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.76 · 14.8% (13 of 88 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.75 · 38.6% (34 of 88 decks)
- Tiller Engine relevance 0.75 · 15.9% (14 of 88 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.75 · 19.3% (17 of 88 decks)
- The Council of Four relevance 0.74 · 30.7% (27 of 88 decks)
- Wall of Denial relevance 0.74 · 13.6% (12 of 88 decks)
All creatures (9)
- Gatecreeper Vine relevance 3.29 · 63.6% (56 of 88 decks)
- District Guide relevance 2.76 · 50.0% (44 of 88 decks)
- Sage of the Maze relevance 2.49 · 45.5% (40 of 88 decks)
- Gatebreaker Ram relevance 2.09 · 33.0% (29 of 88 decks)
- Gate Colossus relevance 1.98 · 30.7% (27 of 88 decks)
- Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 1.04 · 18.2% (16 of 88 decks)
- Tiller Engine relevance 0.75 · 15.9% (14 of 88 decks)
- The Council of Four relevance 0.74 · 30.7% (27 of 88 decks)
- Wall of Denial relevance 0.74 · 13.6% (12 of 88 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Navigation Orb relevance 2.90 · 56.8% (50 of 88 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 1.46 · 37.5% (33 of 88 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 1.02 · 29.5% (26 of 88 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Guild Summit relevance 3.37 · 63.6% (56 of 88 decks)
- Crackling Perimeter relevance 2.14 · 33.0% (29 of 88 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 1.18 · 42.0% (37 of 88 decks)
- Assault Formation relevance 0.80 · 15.9% (14 of 88 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.75 · 38.6% (34 of 88 decks)
All sorceries (10)
- Open the Gates relevance 3.41 · 72.7% (64 of 88 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 2.78 · 77.3% (68 of 88 decks)
- Gates Ablaze relevance 2.64 · 44.3% (39 of 88 decks)
- Explore the Underdark relevance 2.56 · 50.0% (44 of 88 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.23 · 33.0% (29 of 88 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 1.02 · 21.6% (19 of 88 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.88 · 45.5% (40 of 88 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.79 · 14.8% (13 of 88 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.76 · 14.8% (13 of 88 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.75 · 19.3% (17 of 88 decks)
All utility lands (7)
- Basilisk Gate relevance 3.79 · 89.8% (79 of 88 decks)
- Heap Gate relevance 3.56 · 85.2% (75 of 88 decks)
- Maze's End relevance 3.45 · 86.4% (76 of 88 decks)
- Plaza of Harmony relevance 3.12 · 61.4% (54 of 88 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 1.54 · 44.3% (39 of 88 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 1.16 · 28.4% (25 of 88 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.92 · 25.0% (22 of 88 decks)
All lands (16)
- Gond Gate relevance 3.83 · 96.6% (85 of 88 decks)
- Baldur's Gate relevance 3.76 · 93.2% (82 of 88 decks)
- Citadel Gate relevance 3.65 · 93.2% (82 of 88 decks)
- Manor Gate relevance 3.62 · 92.0% (81 of 88 decks)
- Cliffgate relevance 3.59 · 90.9% (80 of 88 decks)
- Sea Gate relevance 3.59 · 90.9% (80 of 88 decks)
- Azorius Guildgate relevance 3.55 · 94.3% (83 of 88 decks)
- Izzet Guildgate relevance 3.45 · 89.8% (79 of 88 decks)
- Boros Guildgate relevance 3.44 · 90.9% (80 of 88 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 3.44 · 90.9% (80 of 88 decks)
- Gruul Guildgate relevance 3.43 · 92.0% (81 of 88 decks)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 3.39 · 92.0% (81 of 88 decks)
- Gateway Plaza relevance 3.16 · 77.3% (68 of 88 decks)
- Thran Portal relevance 2.56 · 55.7% (49 of 88 decks)
- Planar Nexus relevance 1.90 · 36.4% (32 of 88 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.90 · 23.9% (21 of 88 decks)
EDH data for Hold the Gates: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 88 real decks.















































