Color Identity Spread
1530+32+2+6+3+6+1+
That's every commander.
All commanders (15)
- Jon Irenicus, Shattered One relevance 2.42 · 2.5% (181 of 7,218 decks)
- Garland, Royal Kidnapper relevance 1.95 · 2.6% (62 of 2,397 decks)
- X relevance 1.21 · 6.0% (6 of 100 decks)
- Xanathar, Guild Kingpin relevance 1.17 · 1.5% (20 of 1,305 decks)
- Dragonlord Silumgar relevance 1.00 · 3.3% (6 of 184 decks)
- Phoebe, Head of S.N.E.A.K. relevance 0.90 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Nashi, Searcher in the Dark relevance 0.87 · 1.4% (10 of 732 decks)
- Ultimecia, Time Sorceress // Ultimecia, Omnipotent relevance 0.85 · 1.6% (8 of 512 decks)
- Atris, Oracle of Half-Truths relevance 0.69 · 1.3% (6 of 468 decks)
- Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.62 · 2.3% (3 of 131 decks)
- Nebuchadnezzar relevance 0.47 · 1.2% (3 of 252 decks)
- Ur-Drago relevance 0.37 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Sharkey, Tyrant of the Shire relevance 0.30 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Truss, Chief Engineer relevance 0.27 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Wydwen, the Biting Gale relevance 0.24 · 1.3% (1 of 80 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Wrong Turn relevance 1.13 · 28.7% (145 of 505 decks)
- Abyssal Persecutor relevance 1.02 · 27.1% (137 of 505 decks)
- Sudden Substitution relevance 0.90 · 17.2% (87 of 505 decks)
- Rotting Regisaur relevance 0.86 · 22.8% (115 of 505 decks)
- Archfiend of the Dross relevance 0.86 · 22.6% (114 of 505 decks)
- Flesh Reaver relevance 0.85 · 22.8% (115 of 505 decks)
- The Trickster-God's Heist relevance 0.85 · 16.6% (84 of 505 decks)
- Phyrexian Negator relevance 0.85 · 21.0% (106 of 505 decks)
- Steel Golem relevance 0.81 · 20.2% (102 of 505 decks)
- Shifting Grift relevance 0.79 · 17.2% (87 of 505 decks)
- Modify Memory relevance 0.77 · 17.2% (87 of 505 decks)
- Master of the Feast relevance 0.77 · 18.6% (94 of 505 decks)
- Bloodthirsty Blade relevance 0.76 · 17.8% (90 of 505 decks)
- Reins of Power relevance 0.76 · 18.0% (91 of 505 decks)
- Desecration Elemental relevance 0.75 · 18.8% (95 of 505 decks)
- Plague Reaver relevance 0.73 · 17.4% (88 of 505 decks)
- Evil Eye of Urborg relevance 0.73 · 18.0% (91 of 505 decks)
- Demonic Taskmaster relevance 0.71 · 18.4% (93 of 505 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.70 · 39.8% (201 of 505 decks)
- Puca's Mischief relevance 0.70 · 11.7% (59 of 505 decks)
- Cultural Exchange relevance 0.67 · 10.3% (52 of 505 decks)
- Rust Elemental relevance 0.67 · 16.2% (82 of 505 decks)
- Clever Impersonator relevance 0.62 · 19.6% (99 of 505 decks)
- Drinker of Sorrow relevance 0.61 · 15.0% (76 of 505 decks)
- Agent of Treachery relevance 0.61 · 17.2% (87 of 505 decks)
- Ebonblade Reaper relevance 0.61 · 14.9% (75 of 505 decks)
- Grid Monitor relevance 0.61 · 13.9% (70 of 505 decks)
- Phyrexian Soulgorger relevance 0.60 · 13.9% (70 of 505 decks)
- Volatile Stormdrake relevance 0.60 · 15.0% (76 of 505 decks)
- Taniwha relevance 0.59 · 12.9% (65 of 505 decks)
All creatures (32)
- Abyssal Persecutor relevance 1.02 · 27.1% (137 of 505 decks)
- Rotting Regisaur relevance 0.86 · 22.8% (115 of 505 decks)
- Archfiend of the Dross relevance 0.86 · 22.6% (114 of 505 decks)
- Flesh Reaver relevance 0.85 · 22.8% (115 of 505 decks)
- Phyrexian Negator relevance 0.85 · 21.0% (106 of 505 decks)
- Steel Golem relevance 0.81 · 20.2% (102 of 505 decks)
- Master of the Feast relevance 0.77 · 18.6% (94 of 505 decks)
- Desecration Elemental relevance 0.75 · 18.8% (95 of 505 decks)
- Plague Reaver relevance 0.73 · 17.4% (88 of 505 decks)
- Evil Eye of Urborg relevance 0.73 · 18.0% (91 of 505 decks)
- Demonic Taskmaster relevance 0.71 · 18.4% (93 of 505 decks)
- Rust Elemental relevance 0.67 · 16.2% (82 of 505 decks)
- Clever Impersonator relevance 0.62 · 19.6% (99 of 505 decks)
- Drinker of Sorrow relevance 0.61 · 15.0% (76 of 505 decks)
- Agent of Treachery relevance 0.61 · 17.2% (87 of 505 decks)
- Ebonblade Reaper relevance 0.61 · 14.9% (75 of 505 decks)
- Grid Monitor relevance 0.61 · 13.9% (70 of 505 decks)
- Phyrexian Soulgorger relevance 0.60 · 13.9% (70 of 505 decks)
- Volatile Stormdrake relevance 0.60 · 15.0% (76 of 505 decks)
- Taniwha relevance 0.59 · 12.9% (65 of 505 decks)
- Lord of the Pit relevance 0.58 · 13.5% (68 of 505 decks)
- Coveted Falcon relevance 0.57 · 11.7% (59 of 505 decks)
- Hostage Taker relevance 0.56 · 18.0% (91 of 505 decks)
- Evil Eye of Orms-by-Gore relevance 0.56 · 13.9% (70 of 505 decks)
- Baleful Strix relevance 0.56 · 37.8% (191 of 505 decks)
- Thief of Sanity relevance 0.55 · 17.0% (86 of 505 decks)
- Gonti, Lord of Luxury relevance 0.53 · 15.6% (79 of 505 decks)
- Wretched Anurid relevance 0.52 · 12.7% (64 of 505 decks)
- Greater Harvester relevance 0.52 · 12.5% (63 of 505 decks)
- Ebon Drake relevance 0.52 · 13.1% (66 of 505 decks)
- Daring Thief relevance 0.50 · 7.5% (38 of 505 decks)
- Gilded Drake relevance 0.48 · 11.1% (56 of 505 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Bloodthirsty Blade relevance 0.76 · 17.8% (90 of 505 decks)
- Assault Suit relevance 0.56 · 11.9% (60 of 505 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- The Trickster-God's Heist relevance 0.85 · 16.6% (84 of 505 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.70 · 39.8% (201 of 505 decks)
- Puca's Mischief relevance 0.70 · 11.7% (59 of 505 decks)
- Heartless Summoning relevance 0.50 · 14.1% (71 of 505 decks)
- No Mercy relevance 0.49 · 14.1% (71 of 505 decks)
- Exchange of Words relevance 0.48 · 10.1% (51 of 505 decks)
All instants (3)
- Wrong Turn relevance 1.13 · 28.7% (145 of 505 decks)
- Sudden Substitution relevance 0.90 · 17.2% (87 of 505 decks)
- Reins of Power relevance 0.76 · 18.0% (91 of 505 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Shifting Grift relevance 0.79 · 17.2% (87 of 505 decks)
- Modify Memory relevance 0.77 · 17.2% (87 of 505 decks)
- Cultural Exchange relevance 0.67 · 10.3% (52 of 505 decks)
- Fateful Handoff relevance 0.56 · 12.5% (63 of 505 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.55 · 13.7% (69 of 505 decks)
- Come Back Wrong relevance 0.50 · 11.9% (60 of 505 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Homeward Path relevance 0.96 · 24.6% (124 of 505 decks)
EDH data for Perplexing Chimera: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 505 real decks.






















































