Legion's Initiative
Played in 2,297 Naya decks
1030+33+1+5+6+1+4+
Color Identity Spread
20.2% Naya
-
Boros 6,382 · 56.1%
-
Naya 2,297 · 20.2%
-
Mardu 1,635 · 14.4%
-
Five-Color 612 · 5.4%
-
Jeskai 367 · 3.2%
- Other (7) 92 · 0.8%
Commanders
Pantlaza, Sun-Favored 7.9% of decks
Pantlaza, Sun-Favored 7.9% of decks
Rienne, Angel of Rebirth 2.9% of decks
Rienne, Angel of Rebirth 2.9% of decks
Palladia-Mors, the Ruiner 3.6% of decks
Palladia-Mors, the Ruiner 3.6% of decks
Hazezon Tamar 1.3% of decks
Hazezon Tamar 1.3% of decks
Sophina, Spearsage Deserter // Othelm, Sigardian Outcast 2.5% of decks
Sophina, Spearsage Deserter // Othelm, Sigardian Outcast 2.5% of decks
Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder 1.9% of decks
Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder 1.9% of decks
Most Relevant
Eerie Interlude 65.0% of decks
Eerie Interlude 65.0% of decks
Parting Gust 56.8% of decks
Parting Gust 56.8% of decks
Cream of the Crop 58.5% of decks
Cream of the Crop 58.5% of decks
Ephemerate 73.7% of decks
Ephemerate 73.7% of decks
Luminous Broodmoth 55.8% of decks
Luminous Broodmoth 55.8% of decks
Flaming Tyrannosaurus 56.1% of decks
Flaming Tyrannosaurus 56.1% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (10)
- Pantlaza, Sun-Favored relevance 3.24 · 7.9% (2,005 of 25,473 decks)
- Rienne, Angel of Rebirth relevance 0.67 · 2.9% (11 of 380 decks)
- Palladia-Mors, the Ruiner relevance 0.54 · 3.6% (5 of 140 decks)
- Hazezon Tamar relevance 0.30 · 1.3% (5 of 375 decks)
- Sophina, Spearsage Deserter // Othelm, Sigardian Outcast relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (1 of 40 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.15 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.11 · 1.3% (1 of 80 decks)
- Tana, the Bloodsower // Akroma, Vision of Ixidor relevance 0.11 · 1.2% (1 of 83 decks)
- Akiri, Line-Slinger // Ich-Tekik, Salvage Splicer relevance 0.10 · 1.1% (1 of 92 decks)
- Jacques le Vert relevance 0.10 · 1.0% (1 of 99 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Eerie Interlude relevance 2.21 · 65.0% (1,492 of 2,297 decks)
- Parting Gust relevance 2.17 · 56.8% (1,305 of 2,297 decks)
- Cream of the Crop relevance 2.13 · 58.5% (1,344 of 2,297 decks)
- Ephemerate relevance 2.10 · 73.7% (1,694 of 2,297 decks)
- Luminous Broodmoth relevance 2.01 · 55.8% (1,281 of 2,297 decks)
- Flaming Tyrannosaurus relevance 1.97 · 56.1% (1,288 of 2,297 decks)
- Tranquil Frillback relevance 1.97 · 58.7% (1,349 of 2,297 decks)
- Trumpeting Carnosaur relevance 1.86 · 76.3% (1,752 of 2,297 decks)
- Bronzebeak Foragers relevance 1.80 · 73.6% (1,690 of 2,297 decks)
- Kogla and Yidaro relevance 1.79 · 60.3% (1,385 of 2,297 decks)
- Swooping Pteranodon relevance 1.74 · 46.9% (1,078 of 2,297 decks)
- Dinosaurs on a Spaceship relevance 1.73 · 58.8% (1,350 of 2,297 decks)
- Gishath, Sun's Avatar relevance 1.72 · 78.1% (1,794 of 2,297 decks)
- Sneak Attack relevance 1.70 · 46.0% (1,057 of 2,297 decks)
- Topiary Stomper relevance 1.67 · 80.1% (1,841 of 2,297 decks)
- Wrathful Raptors relevance 1.67 · 80.1% (1,839 of 2,297 decks)
- Hulking Raptor relevance 1.65 · 73.4% (1,685 of 2,297 decks)
- Savage Order relevance 1.63 · 56.9% (1,306 of 2,297 decks)
- Curious Altisaur relevance 1.62 · 73.3% (1,683 of 2,297 decks)
- Bonehoard Dracosaur relevance 1.61 · 62.8% (1,442 of 2,297 decks)
- Fanatic of Rhonas relevance 1.58 · 55.5% (1,274 of 2,297 decks)
- Regisaur Alpha relevance 1.55 · 78.6% (1,806 of 2,297 decks)
- Scion of Calamity relevance 1.54 · 63.1% (1,450 of 2,297 decks)
- Earthshaker Dreadmaw relevance 1.53 · 74.0% (1,700 of 2,297 decks)
- Apex Altisaur relevance 1.53 · 76.8% (1,765 of 2,297 decks)
- Cloudshift relevance 1.52 · 42.4% (973 of 2,297 decks)
- Lae'zel's Acrobatics relevance 1.52 · 33.7% (774 of 2,297 decks)
- Smuggler's Surprise relevance 1.51 · 40.9% (940 of 2,297 decks)
- Regal Behemoth relevance 1.50 · 63.5% (1,459 of 2,297 decks)
- Zacama, Primal Calamity relevance 1.47 · 81.6% (1,874 of 2,297 decks)
All creatures (33)
- Luminous Broodmoth relevance 2.01 · 55.8% (1,281 of 2,297 decks)
- Flaming Tyrannosaurus relevance 1.97 · 56.1% (1,288 of 2,297 decks)
- Tranquil Frillback relevance 1.97 · 58.7% (1,349 of 2,297 decks)
- Trumpeting Carnosaur relevance 1.86 · 76.3% (1,752 of 2,297 decks)
- Bronzebeak Foragers relevance 1.80 · 73.6% (1,690 of 2,297 decks)
- Kogla and Yidaro relevance 1.79 · 60.3% (1,385 of 2,297 decks)
- Swooping Pteranodon relevance 1.74 · 46.9% (1,078 of 2,297 decks)
- Dinosaurs on a Spaceship relevance 1.73 · 58.8% (1,350 of 2,297 decks)
- Gishath, Sun's Avatar relevance 1.72 · 78.1% (1,794 of 2,297 decks)
- Topiary Stomper relevance 1.67 · 80.1% (1,841 of 2,297 decks)
- Wrathful Raptors relevance 1.67 · 80.1% (1,839 of 2,297 decks)
- Hulking Raptor relevance 1.65 · 73.4% (1,685 of 2,297 decks)
- Curious Altisaur relevance 1.62 · 73.3% (1,683 of 2,297 decks)
- Bonehoard Dracosaur relevance 1.61 · 62.8% (1,442 of 2,297 decks)
- Fanatic of Rhonas relevance 1.58 · 55.5% (1,274 of 2,297 decks)
- Regisaur Alpha relevance 1.55 · 78.6% (1,806 of 2,297 decks)
- Scion of Calamity relevance 1.54 · 63.1% (1,450 of 2,297 decks)
- Earthshaker Dreadmaw relevance 1.53 · 74.0% (1,700 of 2,297 decks)
- Apex Altisaur relevance 1.53 · 76.8% (1,765 of 2,297 decks)
- Regal Behemoth relevance 1.50 · 63.5% (1,459 of 2,297 decks)
- Zacama, Primal Calamity relevance 1.47 · 81.6% (1,874 of 2,297 decks)
- Etali, Primal Conqueror // Etali, Primal Sickness relevance 1.47 · 72.1% (1,657 of 2,297 decks)
- Palani's Hatcher relevance 1.46 · 60.6% (1,391 of 2,297 decks)
- Ravenous Tyrannosaurus relevance 1.45 · 48.9% (1,124 of 2,297 decks)
- Vaultborn Tyrant relevance 1.44 · 57.1% (1,312 of 2,297 decks)
- Ghalta, Stampede Tyrant relevance 1.44 · 68.6% (1,575 of 2,297 decks)
- Hunting Velociraptor relevance 1.35 · 48.7% (1,119 of 2,297 decks)
- Intrepid Paleontologist relevance 1.28 · 40.3% (926 of 2,297 decks)
- Runic Armasaur relevance 1.26 · 49.8% (1,143 of 2,297 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 1.24 · 72.1% (1,656 of 2,297 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 1.20 · 63.4% (1,457 of 2,297 decks)
- Sunfrill Imitator relevance 1.12 · 45.8% (1,052 of 2,297 decks)
- Roaming Throne relevance 1.07 · 45.8% (1,053 of 2,297 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Cryptic Gateway relevance 1.07 · 22.2% (510 of 2,297 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Cream of the Crop relevance 2.13 · 58.5% (1,344 of 2,297 decks)
- Sneak Attack relevance 1.70 · 46.0% (1,057 of 2,297 decks)
- Shadow in the Warp relevance 1.24 · 29.8% (685 of 2,297 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 1.23 · 83.6% (1,921 of 2,297 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 1.18 · 47.8% (1,098 of 2,297 decks)
All instants (6)
- Eerie Interlude relevance 2.21 · 65.0% (1,492 of 2,297 decks)
- Parting Gust relevance 2.17 · 56.8% (1,305 of 2,297 decks)
- Ephemerate relevance 2.10 · 73.7% (1,694 of 2,297 decks)
- Cloudshift relevance 1.52 · 42.4% (973 of 2,297 decks)
- Lae'zel's Acrobatics relevance 1.52 · 33.7% (774 of 2,297 decks)
- Smuggler's Surprise relevance 1.51 · 40.9% (940 of 2,297 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Savage Order relevance 1.63 · 56.9% (1,306 of 2,297 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 1.27 · 37.5% (862 of 2,297 decks)
- Sundering Eruption // Volcanic Fissure relevance 1.14 · 32.0% (734 of 2,297 decks)
- Arena of Glory relevance 1.11 · 33.8% (777 of 2,297 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 1.05 · 56.2% (1,290 of 2,297 decks)
EDH data for Legion's Initiative: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 2,297 real decks.







































