Wake to Slaughter
Played in 398 Grixis decks
Color Identity Spread
37.4% Grixis
- Grixis 398 · 37.4%
- Rakdos 396 · 37.2%
- Mardu 161 · 15.1%
- Jund 77 · 7.2%
- Five-Color 24 · 2.3%
- Other (5) 9 · 0.8%
All commanders (2)
- Obeka, Brute Chronologist relevance 2.69 · 2.5% (123 of 4,960 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Tormod, the Desecrator relevance 0.81 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Rakshasa Debaser relevance 2.35 · 47.2% (188 of 398 decks)
- Lord of the Forsaken relevance 2.30 · 34.7% (138 of 398 decks)
- Visions of Ruin relevance 2.20 · 35.2% (140 of 398 decks)
- Corpse Connoisseur relevance 2.19 · 35.9% (143 of 398 decks)
- Gravebreaker Lamia relevance 2.18 · 36.7% (146 of 398 decks)
- Molten Primordial relevance 2.04 · 37.9% (151 of 398 decks)
- Visions of Duplicity relevance 1.98 · 28.6% (114 of 398 decks)
- From the Catacombs relevance 1.95 · 35.4% (141 of 398 decks)
- Diluvian Primordial relevance 1.93 · 37.9% (151 of 398 decks)
- Amphin Mutineer relevance 1.86 · 47.0% (187 of 398 decks)
- Sepulchral Primordial relevance 1.85 · 44.7% (178 of 398 decks)
- Canoptek Tomb Sentinel relevance 1.83 · 29.9% (119 of 398 decks)
- Ghouls' Night Out relevance 1.78 · 27.4% (109 of 398 decks)
- Scroll of Isildur relevance 1.73 · 33.4% (133 of 398 decks)
- Scavenged Brawler relevance 1.68 · 33.4% (133 of 398 decks)
- Oliphaunt relevance 1.66 · 37.7% (150 of 398 decks)
- Phial of Galadriel relevance 1.63 · 35.7% (142 of 398 decks)
- Rangers of Ithilien relevance 1.62 · 25.6% (102 of 398 decks)
- The Balrog, Durin's Bane relevance 1.61 · 37.2% (148 of 398 decks)
- Dread Return relevance 1.53 · 41.2% (164 of 398 decks)
- Rampaging War Mammoth relevance 1.52 · 35.4% (141 of 398 decks)
- Monstrosity of the Lake relevance 1.50 · 34.4% (137 of 398 decks)
- Gollum, Patient Plotter relevance 1.45 · 36.2% (144 of 398 decks)
- Lidless Gaze relevance 1.45 · 35.7% (142 of 398 decks)
- Wake the Dragon relevance 1.40 · 36.7% (146 of 398 decks)
- Troll of Khazad-dûm relevance 1.39 · 38.7% (154 of 398 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 1.39 · 41.7% (166 of 398 decks)
- Bilbo, Retired Burglar relevance 1.37 · 37.4% (149 of 398 decks)
- Too Greedily, Too Deep relevance 1.31 · 39.2% (156 of 398 decks)
- Inherited Envelope relevance 1.30 · 35.7% (142 of 398 decks)
All creatures (25)
- Rakshasa Debaser relevance 2.35 · 47.2% (188 of 398 decks)
- Lord of the Forsaken relevance 2.30 · 34.7% (138 of 398 decks)
- Corpse Connoisseur relevance 2.19 · 35.9% (143 of 398 decks)
- Gravebreaker Lamia relevance 2.18 · 36.7% (146 of 398 decks)
- Molten Primordial relevance 2.04 · 37.9% (151 of 398 decks)
- Diluvian Primordial relevance 1.93 · 37.9% (151 of 398 decks)
- Amphin Mutineer relevance 1.86 · 47.0% (187 of 398 decks)
- Sepulchral Primordial relevance 1.85 · 44.7% (178 of 398 decks)
- Canoptek Tomb Sentinel relevance 1.83 · 29.9% (119 of 398 decks)
- Scavenged Brawler relevance 1.68 · 33.4% (133 of 398 decks)
- Oliphaunt relevance 1.66 · 37.7% (150 of 398 decks)
- Rangers of Ithilien relevance 1.62 · 25.6% (102 of 398 decks)
- The Balrog, Durin's Bane relevance 1.61 · 37.2% (148 of 398 decks)
- Rampaging War Mammoth relevance 1.52 · 35.4% (141 of 398 decks)
- Monstrosity of the Lake relevance 1.50 · 34.4% (137 of 398 decks)
- Gollum, Patient Plotter relevance 1.45 · 36.2% (144 of 398 decks)
- Troll of Khazad-dûm relevance 1.39 · 38.7% (154 of 398 decks)
- Bilbo, Retired Burglar relevance 1.37 · 37.4% (149 of 398 decks)
- Wonder relevance 1.22 · 41.0% (163 of 398 decks)
- The Balrog of Moria relevance 1.20 · 39.7% (158 of 398 decks)
- Moria Scavenger relevance 1.16 · 38.4% (153 of 398 decks)
- Sauron, Lord of the Rings relevance 1.14 · 38.4% (153 of 398 decks)
- Feldon of the Third Path relevance 1.10 · 26.9% (107 of 398 decks)
- Identity Thief relevance 1.06 · 22.6% (90 of 398 decks)
- Anger relevance 1.05 · 49.5% (197 of 398 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Phial of Galadriel relevance 1.63 · 35.7% (142 of 398 decks)
- Inherited Envelope relevance 1.30 · 35.7% (142 of 398 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 1.08 · 35.9% (143 of 398 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Scroll of Isildur relevance 1.73 · 33.4% (133 of 398 decks)
All instants (1)
- Glorious End relevance 1.04 · 23.1% (92 of 398 decks)
All sorceries (17)
- Visions of Ruin relevance 2.20 · 35.2% (140 of 398 decks)
- Visions of Duplicity relevance 1.98 · 28.6% (114 of 398 decks)
- From the Catacombs relevance 1.95 · 35.4% (141 of 398 decks)
- Ghouls' Night Out relevance 1.78 · 27.4% (109 of 398 decks)
- Dread Return relevance 1.53 · 41.2% (164 of 398 decks)
- Lidless Gaze relevance 1.45 · 35.7% (142 of 398 decks)
- Wake the Dragon relevance 1.40 · 36.7% (146 of 398 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 1.39 · 41.7% (166 of 398 decks)
- Too Greedily, Too Deep relevance 1.31 · 39.2% (156 of 398 decks)
- Languish relevance 1.30 · 34.4% (137 of 398 decks)
- Widespread Brutality relevance 1.23 · 34.9% (139 of 398 decks)
- Victimize relevance 1.11 · 46.7% (186 of 398 decks)
- Ideas Unbound relevance 1.08 · 24.4% (97 of 398 decks)
- Summons of Saruman relevance 1.08 · 37.4% (149 of 398 decks)
- Sinister Waltz relevance 1.07 · 16.1% (64 of 398 decks)
- Living Death relevance 1.04 · 39.7% (158 of 398 decks)
- Hate Mirage relevance 1.01 · 20.6% (82 of 398 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Port of Karfell relevance 1.57 · 37.4% (149 of 398 decks)
All lands (2)
- Molten Tributary relevance 1.14 · 26.1% (104 of 398 decks)
- Geothermal Bog relevance 1.12 · 25.6% (102 of 398 decks)
EDH data for Wake to Slaughter: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 398 real decks.