230+10+13+3+7+5+2+10+
Color Identity Spread
2.6% Rakdos
-
Five-Color 659 · 10.4%
-
Jeskai 623 · 9.8%
-
Grixis 492 · 7.7%
-
Colorless 473 · 7.4%
-
Azorius 439 · 6.9%
-
Boros 419 · 6.6%
-
Blue 289 · 4.5%
-
White 282 · 4.4%
-
Green 257 · 4.0%
-
Mardu 255 · 4.0%
-
Black 249 · 3.9%
-
Temur 231 · 3.6%
-
Orzhov 196 · 3.1%
-
Dimir 194 · 3.0%
-
Red 191 · 3.0%
-
Rakdos 168 · 2.6%
-
Naya 155 · 2.4%
-
Esper 148 · 2.3%
-
Izzet 145 · 2.3%
- Other (13) 501 · 7.9%
Commanders
Most Relevant
Praetor's Grasp 33.3% of decks
Praetor's Grasp 33.3% of decks
Lion's Eye Diamond 26.8% of decks
Lion's Eye Diamond 26.8% of decks
Mox Diamond 29.8% of decks
Mox Diamond 29.8% of decks
Mox Opal 30.4% of decks
Mox Opal 30.4% of decks
Defense Grid 23.2% of decks
Defense Grid 23.2% of decks
Mana Vault 31.5% of decks
Mana Vault 31.5% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Arno Dorian relevance 0.85 · 3.8% (2 of 53 decks)
- Francisco, Fowl Marauder // Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh relevance 0.61 · 1.1% (2 of 175 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Praetor's Grasp relevance 1.28 · 33.3% (56 of 168 decks)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 1.00 · 26.8% (45 of 168 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.99 · 29.8% (50 of 168 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.98 · 30.4% (51 of 168 decks)
- Defense Grid relevance 0.96 · 23.2% (39 of 168 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.93 · 31.5% (53 of 168 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.92 · 31.5% (53 of 168 decks)
- Vexing Bauble relevance 0.88 · 22.0% (37 of 168 decks)
- Imperial Seal relevance 0.88 · 28.0% (47 of 168 decks)
- Final Fortune relevance 0.87 · 22.6% (38 of 168 decks)
- Rite of Flame relevance 0.84 · 28.6% (48 of 168 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.84 · 21.4% (36 of 168 decks)
- Ragavan, Nimble Pilferer relevance 0.84 · 36.3% (61 of 168 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.83 · 32.7% (55 of 168 decks)
- Simian Spirit Guide relevance 0.83 · 29.2% (49 of 168 decks)
- Tainted Pact relevance 0.80 · 20.2% (34 of 168 decks)
- Cunning Rhetoric relevance 0.80 · 18.5% (31 of 168 decks)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 0.79 · 32.1% (54 of 168 decks)
- Beseech the Mirror relevance 0.78 · 24.4% (41 of 168 decks)
- Necropotence relevance 0.78 · 26.2% (44 of 168 decks)
- Pyroblast relevance 0.78 · 31.0% (52 of 168 decks)
- Yawgmoth's Will relevance 0.77 · 18.5% (31 of 168 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.77 · 28.0% (47 of 168 decks)
- Gonti, Lord of Luxury relevance 0.77 · 20.2% (34 of 168 decks)
- Rev, Tithe Extractor relevance 0.76 · 20.8% (35 of 168 decks)
- Hoarding Broodlord relevance 0.76 · 22.0% (37 of 168 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.75 · 25.0% (42 of 168 decks)
- Underworld Breach relevance 0.74 · 28.0% (47 of 168 decks)
- Red Elemental Blast relevance 0.73 · 29.2% (49 of 168 decks)
- Gonti, Night Minister relevance 0.73 · 18.5% (31 of 168 decks)
All creatures (10)
- Ragavan, Nimble Pilferer relevance 0.84 · 36.3% (61 of 168 decks)
- Simian Spirit Guide relevance 0.83 · 29.2% (49 of 168 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.77 · 28.0% (47 of 168 decks)
- Gonti, Lord of Luxury relevance 0.77 · 20.2% (34 of 168 decks)
- Rev, Tithe Extractor relevance 0.76 · 20.8% (35 of 168 decks)
- Hoarding Broodlord relevance 0.76 · 22.0% (37 of 168 decks)
- Gonti, Night Minister relevance 0.73 · 18.5% (31 of 168 decks)
- Dragon's Rage Channeler relevance 0.72 · 18.5% (31 of 168 decks)
- Wild-Magic Sorcerer relevance 0.71 · 22.0% (37 of 168 decks)
- Arvinox, the Mind Flail relevance 0.71 · 12.5% (21 of 168 decks)
All artifacts (13)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 1.00 · 26.8% (45 of 168 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.99 · 29.8% (50 of 168 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.98 · 30.4% (51 of 168 decks)
- Defense Grid relevance 0.96 · 23.2% (39 of 168 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.93 · 31.5% (53 of 168 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.92 · 31.5% (53 of 168 decks)
- Vexing Bauble relevance 0.88 · 22.0% (37 of 168 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.84 · 21.4% (36 of 168 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.83 · 32.7% (55 of 168 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.75 · 25.0% (42 of 168 decks)
- Grinding Station relevance 0.69 · 17.3% (29 of 168 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.69 · 19.0% (32 of 168 decks)
- Wishclaw Talisman relevance 0.68 · 23.8% (40 of 168 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Cunning Rhetoric relevance 0.80 · 18.5% (31 of 168 decks)
- Necropotence relevance 0.78 · 26.2% (44 of 168 decks)
- Underworld Breach relevance 0.74 · 28.0% (47 of 168 decks)
All instants (7)
- Final Fortune relevance 0.87 · 22.6% (38 of 168 decks)
- Tainted Pact relevance 0.80 · 20.2% (34 of 168 decks)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 0.79 · 32.1% (54 of 168 decks)
- Pyroblast relevance 0.78 · 31.0% (52 of 168 decks)
- Red Elemental Blast relevance 0.73 · 29.2% (49 of 168 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.72 · 35.7% (60 of 168 decks)
- You Find Some Prisoners relevance 0.70 · 18.5% (31 of 168 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Praetor's Grasp relevance 1.28 · 33.3% (56 of 168 decks)
- Imperial Seal relevance 0.88 · 28.0% (47 of 168 decks)
- Rite of Flame relevance 0.84 · 28.6% (48 of 168 decks)
- Beseech the Mirror relevance 0.78 · 24.4% (41 of 168 decks)
- Yawgmoth's Will relevance 0.77 · 18.5% (31 of 168 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.72 · 15.5% (26 of 168 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.67 · 19.0% (32 of 168 decks)
All lands (10)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.95 · 33.3% (56 of 168 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.90 · 33.3% (56 of 168 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.89 · 22.0% (37 of 168 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.88 · 28.6% (48 of 168 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.81 · 33.3% (56 of 168 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.80 · 28.6% (48 of 168 decks)
- Badlands relevance 0.74 · 35.7% (60 of 168 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.74 · 28.6% (48 of 168 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.73 · 28.0% (47 of 168 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.68 · 25.0% (42 of 168 decks)
EDH data for Apple of Eden, Isu Relic: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 168 real decks.

















































