Phantasmal Bear
Played in 36 Azorius decks
330+18+1+4+15+12+
Color Identity Spread
6.0% Azorius
-
Blue 437 · 72.8%
-
Azorius 36 · 6.0%
-
Simic 25 · 4.2%
-
Five-Color 23 · 3.8%
-
Dimir 18 · 3.0%
- Other (13) 61 · 10.2%
Commanders
Most Relevant
Peel from Reality 55.6% of decks
Peel from Reality 55.6% of decks
Phantasmal Shieldback 52.8% of decks
Phantasmal Shieldback 52.8% of decks
Power Sink 52.8% of decks
Power Sink 52.8% of decks
Index 50.0% of decks
Index 50.0% of decks
Mighty Leap 47.2% of decks
Mighty Leap 47.2% of decks
Jace's Phantasm 52.8% of decks
Jace's Phantasm 52.8% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (3)
- Sokka, Lateral Strategist relevance 1.36 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Ghost of Ramirez DePietro // Keleth, Sunmane Familiar relevance 0.93 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Tobias, Doomed Conqueror relevance 0.54 · 1.2% (1 of 81 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Peel from Reality relevance 3.62 · 55.6% (20 of 36 decks)
- Phantasmal Shieldback relevance 3.54 · 52.8% (19 of 36 decks)
- Power Sink relevance 3.26 · 52.8% (19 of 36 decks)
- Index relevance 3.25 · 50.0% (18 of 36 decks)
- Mighty Leap relevance 3.25 · 47.2% (17 of 36 decks)
- Jace's Phantasm relevance 3.21 · 52.8% (19 of 36 decks)
- Portent relevance 3.21 · 58.3% (21 of 36 decks)
- Call to Heel relevance 3.19 · 47.2% (17 of 36 decks)
- Recall relevance 3.18 · 47.2% (17 of 36 decks)
- Rush of Ice relevance 3.13 · 47.2% (17 of 36 decks)
- Sapphire Charm relevance 3.12 · 47.2% (17 of 36 decks)
- Doomed Traveler relevance 3.12 · 47.2% (17 of 36 decks)
- Ghostform relevance 3.09 · 47.2% (17 of 36 decks)
- Repeal relevance 3.06 · 47.2% (17 of 36 decks)
- Bonds of Faith relevance 3.06 · 44.4% (16 of 36 decks)
- Nephalia Smuggler relevance 3.04 · 47.2% (17 of 36 decks)
- Glaring Aegis relevance 3.02 · 44.4% (16 of 36 decks)
- Arcane Flight relevance 3.00 · 47.2% (17 of 36 decks)
- Rescue relevance 3.00 · 44.4% (16 of 36 decks)
- Inspired Charge relevance 2.99 · 44.4% (16 of 36 decks)
- Reconstruction relevance 2.99 · 44.4% (16 of 36 decks)
- Prismatic Ending relevance 2.97 · 44.4% (16 of 36 decks)
- Bonesplitter relevance 2.96 · 44.4% (16 of 36 decks)
- Alley Evasion relevance 2.96 · 44.4% (16 of 36 decks)
- Phantom Interference relevance 2.95 · 50.0% (18 of 36 decks)
- Prehistoric Pet relevance 2.95 · 44.4% (16 of 36 decks)
- Peach Garden Oath relevance 2.94 · 47.2% (17 of 36 decks)
- Merfolk Windrobber relevance 2.94 · 44.4% (16 of 36 decks)
- Portent of Calamity relevance 2.93 · 50.0% (18 of 36 decks)
- Court Hussar relevance 2.92 · 44.4% (16 of 36 decks)
All creatures (18)
- Phantasmal Shieldback relevance 3.54 · 52.8% (19 of 36 decks)
- Jace's Phantasm relevance 3.21 · 52.8% (19 of 36 decks)
- Doomed Traveler relevance 3.12 · 47.2% (17 of 36 decks)
- Nephalia Smuggler relevance 3.04 · 47.2% (17 of 36 decks)
- Prehistoric Pet relevance 2.95 · 44.4% (16 of 36 decks)
- Merfolk Windrobber relevance 2.94 · 44.4% (16 of 36 decks)
- Court Hussar relevance 2.92 · 44.4% (16 of 36 decks)
- Pristine Skywise relevance 2.90 · 44.4% (16 of 36 decks)
- Illvoi Galeblade relevance 2.89 · 47.2% (17 of 36 decks)
- Isamaru, Hound of Konda relevance 2.86 · 41.7% (15 of 36 decks)
- Perilous Myr relevance 2.85 · 41.7% (15 of 36 decks)
- Aether Figment relevance 2.84 · 41.7% (15 of 36 decks)
- Alabaster Mage relevance 2.84 · 41.7% (15 of 36 decks)
- Sage's Row Denizen relevance 2.84 · 41.7% (15 of 36 decks)
- Kraken Hatchling relevance 2.84 · 44.4% (16 of 36 decks)
- Court Homunculus relevance 2.84 · 41.7% (15 of 36 decks)
- Dragon's Eye Savants relevance 2.84 · 41.7% (15 of 36 decks)
- Hydro-Man, Fluid Felon relevance 2.82 · 44.4% (16 of 36 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Bonesplitter relevance 2.96 · 44.4% (16 of 36 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Bonds of Faith relevance 3.06 · 44.4% (16 of 36 decks)
- Glaring Aegis relevance 3.02 · 44.4% (16 of 36 decks)
- Arcane Flight relevance 3.00 · 47.2% (17 of 36 decks)
- Claustrophobia relevance 2.90 · 44.4% (16 of 36 decks)
All instants (15)
- Peel from Reality relevance 3.62 · 55.6% (20 of 36 decks)
- Power Sink relevance 3.26 · 52.8% (19 of 36 decks)
- Mighty Leap relevance 3.25 · 47.2% (17 of 36 decks)
- Call to Heel relevance 3.19 · 47.2% (17 of 36 decks)
- Sapphire Charm relevance 3.12 · 47.2% (17 of 36 decks)
- Repeal relevance 3.06 · 47.2% (17 of 36 decks)
- Rescue relevance 3.00 · 44.4% (16 of 36 decks)
- Inspired Charge relevance 2.99 · 44.4% (16 of 36 decks)
- Alley Evasion relevance 2.96 · 44.4% (16 of 36 decks)
- Phantom Interference relevance 2.95 · 50.0% (18 of 36 decks)
- Countermand relevance 2.88 · 44.4% (16 of 36 decks)
- Ertai's Meddling relevance 2.86 · 41.7% (15 of 36 decks)
- Dispelling Exhale relevance 2.86 · 41.7% (15 of 36 decks)
- Oona's Grace relevance 2.84 · 41.7% (15 of 36 decks)
- Clairvoyance relevance 2.82 · 44.4% (16 of 36 decks)
All sorceries (12)
- Index relevance 3.25 · 50.0% (18 of 36 decks)
- Portent relevance 3.21 · 58.3% (21 of 36 decks)
- Recall relevance 3.18 · 47.2% (17 of 36 decks)
- Rush of Ice relevance 3.13 · 47.2% (17 of 36 decks)
- Ghostform relevance 3.09 · 47.2% (17 of 36 decks)
- Reconstruction relevance 2.99 · 44.4% (16 of 36 decks)
- Prismatic Ending relevance 2.97 · 44.4% (16 of 36 decks)
- Peach Garden Oath relevance 2.94 · 47.2% (17 of 36 decks)
- Portent of Calamity relevance 2.93 · 50.0% (18 of 36 decks)
- Cloak of Feathers relevance 2.88 · 41.7% (15 of 36 decks)
- Breakthrough relevance 2.86 · 44.4% (16 of 36 decks)
- Silent Departure relevance 2.83 · 44.4% (16 of 36 decks)
EDH data for Phantasmal Bear: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 36 real decks.



















































