Setessan Tactics
Played in 91 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
2.0% Simic
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (4)
- Venus, Torn Between Worlds relevance 2.50 · 6.1% (13 of 214 decks)
- It Came from Planet Glurg relevance 1.08 · 2.5% (3 of 122 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Sword Coast Sailor relevance 0.46 · 1.4% (1 of 73 decks)
- Zegana, Utopian Speaker relevance 0.45 · 1.2% (1 of 83 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Prizefight relevance 1.20 · 19.8% (18 of 91 decks)
- Tail Swipe relevance 1.18 · 18.7% (17 of 91 decks)
- Decisive Denial relevance 1.00 · 39.6% (36 of 91 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.82 · 20.9% (19 of 91 decks)
- Ulvenwald Tracker relevance 0.81 · 13.2% (12 of 91 decks)
- Inscription of Abundance relevance 0.79 · 19.8% (18 of 91 decks)
- Renegade Krasis relevance 0.75 · 13.2% (12 of 91 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.72 · 15.4% (14 of 91 decks)
- Ancient Animus relevance 0.71 · 12.1% (11 of 91 decks)
- The Ooze relevance 0.63 · 15.4% (14 of 91 decks)
- Predator Ooze relevance 0.59 · 11.0% (10 of 91 decks)
- Voidslime relevance 0.58 · 17.6% (16 of 91 decks)
- Scavenging Ooze relevance 0.58 · 14.3% (13 of 91 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.50 · 24.2% (22 of 91 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.50 · 17.6% (16 of 91 decks)
- Momentous Fall relevance 0.48 · 8.8% (8 of 91 decks)
- Aggressive Biomancy relevance 0.47 · 14.3% (13 of 91 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.46 · 17.6% (16 of 91 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.46 · 23.1% (21 of 91 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.44 · 15.4% (14 of 91 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.44 · 13.2% (12 of 91 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.43 · 16.5% (15 of 91 decks)
- Strength of Will relevance 0.42 · 8.8% (8 of 91 decks)
- Mutagen Man, Living Ooze relevance 0.42 · 11.0% (10 of 91 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.42 · 8.8% (8 of 91 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.42 · 12.1% (11 of 91 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 0.41 · 13.2% (12 of 91 decks)
- Vigor relevance 0.40 · 9.9% (9 of 91 decks)
- Ray Fillet, Wave Warrior relevance 0.38 · 8.8% (8 of 91 decks)
- Plasm Capture relevance 0.38 · 9.9% (9 of 91 decks)
All creatures (16)
- Ulvenwald Tracker relevance 0.81 · 13.2% (12 of 91 decks)
- Renegade Krasis relevance 0.75 · 13.2% (12 of 91 decks)
- Predator Ooze relevance 0.59 · 11.0% (10 of 91 decks)
- Scavenging Ooze relevance 0.58 · 14.3% (13 of 91 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.50 · 24.2% (22 of 91 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.50 · 17.6% (16 of 91 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.44 · 13.2% (12 of 91 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.43 · 16.5% (15 of 91 decks)
- Mutagen Man, Living Ooze relevance 0.42 · 11.0% (10 of 91 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.42 · 12.1% (11 of 91 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 0.41 · 13.2% (12 of 91 decks)
- Vigor relevance 0.40 · 9.9% (9 of 91 decks)
- Ray Fillet, Wave Warrior relevance 0.38 · 8.8% (8 of 91 decks)
- Trygon Predator relevance 0.37 · 12.1% (11 of 91 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 0.37 · 13.2% (12 of 91 decks)
- Progenitor Mimic relevance 0.37 · 11.0% (10 of 91 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- The Ooze relevance 0.63 · 15.4% (14 of 91 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.38 · 11.0% (10 of 91 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.38 · 14.3% (13 of 91 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.44 · 15.4% (14 of 91 decks)
- Level Up relevance 0.38 · 8.8% (8 of 91 decks)
All instants (13)
- Prizefight relevance 1.20 · 19.8% (18 of 91 decks)
- Tail Swipe relevance 1.18 · 18.7% (17 of 91 decks)
- Decisive Denial relevance 1.00 · 39.6% (36 of 91 decks)
- Inscription of Abundance relevance 0.79 · 19.8% (18 of 91 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.72 · 15.4% (14 of 91 decks)
- Ancient Animus relevance 0.71 · 12.1% (11 of 91 decks)
- Voidslime relevance 0.58 · 17.6% (16 of 91 decks)
- Momentous Fall relevance 0.48 · 8.8% (8 of 91 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.46 · 23.1% (21 of 91 decks)
- Strength of Will relevance 0.42 · 8.8% (8 of 91 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.42 · 8.8% (8 of 91 decks)
- Plasm Capture relevance 0.38 · 9.9% (9 of 91 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.37 · 11.0% (10 of 91 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.82 · 20.9% (19 of 91 decks)
- Aggressive Biomancy relevance 0.47 · 14.3% (13 of 91 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.46 · 17.6% (16 of 91 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.38 · 12.1% (11 of 91 decks)
All utility lands (5)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.70 · 16.5% (15 of 91 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.51 · 16.5% (15 of 91 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.42 · 13.2% (12 of 91 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.40 · 20.9% (19 of 91 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.38 · 12.1% (11 of 91 decks)
All lands (7)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.47 · 12.1% (11 of 91 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.43 · 16.5% (15 of 91 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.43 · 28.6% (26 of 91 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.42 · 24.2% (22 of 91 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.41 · 25.3% (23 of 91 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.39 · 24.2% (22 of 91 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.37 · 22.0% (20 of 91 decks)
EDH data for Setessan Tactics: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 91 real decks.