Shapers of Nature
Played in 31 Witch-Maw decks
Color Identity Spread
2.3% Witch-Maw
Most Relevant
All most relevant (10)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 0.86 · 29.0% (9 of 31 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 0.82 · 35.5% (11 of 31 decks)
- Corpsejack Menace relevance 0.79 · 29.0% (9 of 31 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.77 · 25.8% (8 of 31 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.74 · 32.3% (10 of 31 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.68 · 25.8% (8 of 31 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.63 · 25.8% (8 of 31 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.60 · 25.8% (8 of 31 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.43 · 35.5% (11 of 31 decks)
- Astral Cornucopia relevance 0.38 · 25.8% (8 of 31 decks)
All creatures (4)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 0.86 · 29.0% (9 of 31 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 0.82 · 35.5% (11 of 31 decks)
- Corpsejack Menace relevance 0.79 · 29.0% (9 of 31 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.60 · 25.8% (8 of 31 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.63 · 25.8% (8 of 31 decks)
- Astral Cornucopia relevance 0.38 · 25.8% (8 of 31 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.77 · 25.8% (8 of 31 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.74 · 32.3% (10 of 31 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.43 · 35.5% (11 of 31 decks)
All instants (1)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.68 · 25.8% (8 of 31 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.37 · 25.8% (8 of 31 decks)
All lands (5)
- Opulent Palace relevance 0.81 · 51.6% (16 of 31 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.72 · 38.7% (12 of 31 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.61 · 29.0% (9 of 31 decks)
- Seaside Citadel relevance 0.53 · 32.3% (10 of 31 decks)
- Sandsteppe Citadel relevance 0.41 · 25.8% (8 of 31 decks)
EDH data for Shapers of Nature: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 31 real decks.