Serendib Sorcerer
Played in 256 Grixis decks
230+27+4+2+8+3+2+4+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
Harbinger of the Tides 64.8% of decks
Harbinger of the Tides 64.8% of decks
Portal Mage 73.4% of decks
Portal Mage 73.4% of decks
Polymorphist's Jest 66.4% of decks
Polymorphist's Jest 66.4% of decks
Mirror of the Forebears 52.7% of decks
Mirror of the Forebears 52.7% of decks
Shadowmage Infiltrator 70.3% of decks
Shadowmage Infiltrator 70.3% of decks
Magus of the Abyss 53.5% of decks
Magus of the Abyss 53.5% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Inalla, Archmage Ritualist relevance 3.35 · 2.3% (208 of 8,963 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Sengir, the Dark Baron relevance 0.94 · 8.0% (2 of 25 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Harbinger of the Tides relevance 3.99 · 64.8% (166 of 256 decks)
- Portal Mage relevance 3.98 · 73.4% (188 of 256 decks)
- Polymorphist's Jest relevance 3.64 · 66.4% (170 of 256 decks)
- Mirror of the Forebears relevance 3.63 · 52.7% (135 of 256 decks)
- Shadowmage Infiltrator relevance 3.60 · 70.3% (180 of 256 decks)
- Magus of the Abyss relevance 3.59 · 53.5% (137 of 256 decks)
- Izzet Chronarch relevance 3.53 · 57.0% (146 of 256 decks)
- Silumgar's Command relevance 3.52 · 57.0% (146 of 256 decks)
- Izzet Chemister relevance 3.50 · 53.1% (136 of 256 decks)
- Mercurial Chemister relevance 3.47 · 59.8% (153 of 256 decks)
- Havengul Lich relevance 3.46 · 67.6% (173 of 256 decks)
- Etherium-Horn Sorcerer relevance 3.39 · 52.3% (134 of 256 decks)
- Nivix Guildmage relevance 3.37 · 53.9% (138 of 256 decks)
- Vela the Night-Clad relevance 3.36 · 62.9% (161 of 256 decks)
- Taigam, Sidisi's Hand relevance 3.36 · 50.0% (128 of 256 decks)
- Vindictive Lich relevance 3.35 · 63.3% (162 of 256 decks)
- Arcanis the Omnipotent relevance 3.31 · 69.5% (178 of 256 decks)
- Galecaster Colossus relevance 3.28 · 68.0% (174 of 256 decks)
- Merchant of Secrets relevance 3.20 · 55.9% (143 of 256 decks)
- Body Double relevance 3.19 · 53.9% (138 of 256 decks)
- Sea Gate Oracle relevance 3.07 · 66.0% (169 of 256 decks)
- Azami, Lady of Scrolls relevance 2.92 · 70.3% (180 of 256 decks)
- Corpse Augur relevance 2.86 · 43.8% (112 of 256 decks)
- Nin, the Pain Artist relevance 2.84 · 58.2% (149 of 256 decks)
- Apprentice Necromancer relevance 2.81 · 70.7% (181 of 256 decks)
- Necromantic Selection relevance 2.80 · 52.7% (135 of 256 decks)
- Memory Plunder relevance 2.77 · 59.4% (152 of 256 decks)
- Nevinyrral's Disk relevance 2.77 · 55.1% (141 of 256 decks)
- Crosis's Charm relevance 2.73 · 68.0% (174 of 256 decks)
- Marchesa, the Black Rose relevance 2.73 · 66.0% (169 of 256 decks)
All creatures (27)
- Harbinger of the Tides relevance 3.99 · 64.8% (166 of 256 decks)
- Portal Mage relevance 3.98 · 73.4% (188 of 256 decks)
- Shadowmage Infiltrator relevance 3.60 · 70.3% (180 of 256 decks)
- Magus of the Abyss relevance 3.59 · 53.5% (137 of 256 decks)
- Izzet Chronarch relevance 3.53 · 57.0% (146 of 256 decks)
- Izzet Chemister relevance 3.50 · 53.1% (136 of 256 decks)
- Mercurial Chemister relevance 3.47 · 59.8% (153 of 256 decks)
- Havengul Lich relevance 3.46 · 67.6% (173 of 256 decks)
- Etherium-Horn Sorcerer relevance 3.39 · 52.3% (134 of 256 decks)
- Nivix Guildmage relevance 3.37 · 53.9% (138 of 256 decks)
- Vela the Night-Clad relevance 3.36 · 62.9% (161 of 256 decks)
- Taigam, Sidisi's Hand relevance 3.36 · 50.0% (128 of 256 decks)
- Vindictive Lich relevance 3.35 · 63.3% (162 of 256 decks)
- Arcanis the Omnipotent relevance 3.31 · 69.5% (178 of 256 decks)
- Galecaster Colossus relevance 3.28 · 68.0% (174 of 256 decks)
- Merchant of Secrets relevance 3.20 · 55.9% (143 of 256 decks)
- Body Double relevance 3.19 · 53.9% (138 of 256 decks)
- Sea Gate Oracle relevance 3.07 · 66.0% (169 of 256 decks)
- Azami, Lady of Scrolls relevance 2.92 · 70.3% (180 of 256 decks)
- Corpse Augur relevance 2.86 · 43.8% (112 of 256 decks)
- Nin, the Pain Artist relevance 2.84 · 58.2% (149 of 256 decks)
- Apprentice Necromancer relevance 2.81 · 70.7% (181 of 256 decks)
- Marchesa, the Black Rose relevance 2.73 · 66.0% (169 of 256 decks)
- Bloodline Necromancer relevance 2.71 · 73.4% (188 of 256 decks)
- Puppeteer Clique relevance 2.56 · 69.9% (179 of 256 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 2.42 · 70.3% (180 of 256 decks)
- Niv-Mizzet, the Firemind relevance 2.20 · 57.8% (148 of 256 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Mirror of the Forebears relevance 3.63 · 52.7% (135 of 256 decks)
- Nevinyrral's Disk relevance 2.77 · 55.1% (141 of 256 decks)
- Unstable Obelisk relevance 2.68 · 40.6% (104 of 256 decks)
- Darksteel Ingot relevance 2.54 · 50.8% (130 of 256 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Shifting Shadow relevance 2.56 · 40.2% (103 of 256 decks)
- Curse of Verbosity relevance 1.93 · 46.9% (120 of 256 decks)
All instants (8)
- Polymorphist's Jest relevance 3.64 · 66.4% (170 of 256 decks)
- Silumgar's Command relevance 3.52 · 57.0% (146 of 256 decks)
- Memory Plunder relevance 2.77 · 59.4% (152 of 256 decks)
- Crosis's Charm relevance 2.73 · 68.0% (174 of 256 decks)
- Into the Roil relevance 2.64 · 46.9% (120 of 256 decks)
- Cauldron Dance relevance 2.53 · 49.6% (127 of 256 decks)
- Opportunity relevance 2.51 · 38.7% (99 of 256 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 2.12 · 66.0% (169 of 256 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Necromantic Selection relevance 2.80 · 52.7% (135 of 256 decks)
- Spelltwine relevance 2.55 · 48.8% (125 of 256 decks)
- Clone Legion relevance 2.25 · 50.4% (129 of 256 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Mystifying Maze relevance 3.43 · 55.9% (143 of 256 decks)
- Jwar Isle Refuge relevance 2.97 · 59.8% (153 of 256 decks)
All lands (4)
- Vivid Crag relevance 3.28 · 56.6% (145 of 256 decks)
- Vivid Marsh relevance 3.20 · 57.8% (148 of 256 decks)
- Vivid Creek relevance 2.92 · 54.3% (139 of 256 decks)
- Grixis Panorama relevance 2.12 · 55.5% (142 of 256 decks)
EDH data for Serendib Sorcerer: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 256 real decks.










































