Living Tsunami
Played in 30 Azorius decks
Color Identity Spread
19.5% Azorius
All most relevant (30)
- Lightshell Duo relevance 4.12 · 60.0% (18 of 30 decks)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 4.08 · 60.0% (18 of 30 decks)
- Master of Waves relevance 3.89 · 63.3% (19 of 30 decks)
- Library Larcenist relevance 3.82 · 56.7% (17 of 30 decks)
- Living Conundrum relevance 3.77 · 56.7% (17 of 30 decks)
- Long River Lurker relevance 3.74 · 56.7% (17 of 30 decks)
- Aven Fogbringer relevance 3.67 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Aetherplasm relevance 3.66 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Aspiring Aeronaut relevance 3.66 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Lunar Force relevance 3.65 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Library of Lat-Nam relevance 3.63 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Logic Knot relevance 3.63 · 56.7% (17 of 30 decks)
- Lost Days relevance 3.62 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Clammy Prowler relevance 3.62 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Lord Jyscal Guado relevance 3.58 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Lockjaw, Slobbering Teleporter relevance 3.57 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Aven Fisher relevance 3.56 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Magus of the Future relevance 3.54 · 56.7% (17 of 30 decks)
- Merfolk Windrobber relevance 3.53 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Meloku the Clouded Mirror relevance 3.45 · 60.0% (18 of 30 decks)
- Inkwell Leviathan relevance 3.44 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Aeromoeba relevance 3.43 · 50.0% (15 of 30 decks)
- Aerie Worshippers relevance 3.42 · 50.0% (15 of 30 decks)
- Lighthouse Chronologist relevance 3.40 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Levitation relevance 3.39 · 56.7% (17 of 30 decks)
- Jace's Ingenuity relevance 3.39 · 50.0% (15 of 30 decks)
- Enclave Cryptologist relevance 3.38 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Lumbering Battlement relevance 3.38 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Mistcaller relevance 3.38 · 50.0% (15 of 30 decks)
- Lightshield Parry relevance 3.38 · 50.0% (15 of 30 decks)
All creatures (40)
- Lightshell Duo relevance 4.12 · 60.0% (18 of 30 decks)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 4.08 · 60.0% (18 of 30 decks)
- Master of Waves relevance 3.89 · 63.3% (19 of 30 decks)
- Library Larcenist relevance 3.82 · 56.7% (17 of 30 decks)
- Living Conundrum relevance 3.77 · 56.7% (17 of 30 decks)
- Long River Lurker relevance 3.74 · 56.7% (17 of 30 decks)
- Aven Fogbringer relevance 3.67 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Aetherplasm relevance 3.66 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Aspiring Aeronaut relevance 3.66 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Clammy Prowler relevance 3.62 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Lord Jyscal Guado relevance 3.58 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Lockjaw, Slobbering Teleporter relevance 3.57 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Aven Fisher relevance 3.56 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Magus of the Future relevance 3.54 · 56.7% (17 of 30 decks)
- Merfolk Windrobber relevance 3.53 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Meloku the Clouded Mirror relevance 3.45 · 60.0% (18 of 30 decks)
- Inkwell Leviathan relevance 3.44 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Aeromoeba relevance 3.43 · 50.0% (15 of 30 decks)
- Aerie Worshippers relevance 3.42 · 50.0% (15 of 30 decks)
- Lighthouse Chronologist relevance 3.40 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Enclave Cryptologist relevance 3.38 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Lumbering Battlement relevance 3.38 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Mistcaller relevance 3.38 · 50.0% (15 of 30 decks)
- Looter il-Kor relevance 3.38 · 56.7% (17 of 30 decks)
- Aberrant Researcher // Perfected Form relevance 3.37 · 50.0% (15 of 30 decks)
- Lone Rider // It That Rides as One relevance 3.36 · 50.0% (15 of 30 decks)
- Lone Missionary relevance 3.34 · 50.0% (15 of 30 decks)
- Lulu, Loyal Hollyphant relevance 3.34 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Mirrorshell Crab relevance 3.34 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Lord of Change relevance 3.33 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Cyclone Summoner relevance 3.33 · 50.0% (15 of 30 decks)
- Marauding Sphinx relevance 3.32 · 50.0% (15 of 30 decks)
- Loran, Disciple of History relevance 3.31 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Angel of Renewal relevance 3.30 · 50.0% (15 of 30 decks)
- Mechanozoa relevance 3.30 · 56.7% (17 of 30 decks)
- Court Hussar relevance 3.29 · 50.0% (15 of 30 decks)
- Lionheart Glimmer relevance 3.29 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Deep-Sea Kraken relevance 3.27 · 50.0% (15 of 30 decks)
- Deceiver Exarch relevance 3.27 · 50.0% (15 of 30 decks)
- Academy Journeymage relevance 3.27 · 50.0% (15 of 30 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Lunar Force relevance 3.65 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Levitation relevance 3.39 · 56.7% (17 of 30 decks)
All instants (6)
- Logic Knot relevance 3.63 · 56.7% (17 of 30 decks)
- Lost Days relevance 3.62 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Jace's Ingenuity relevance 3.39 · 50.0% (15 of 30 decks)
- Lightshield Parry relevance 3.38 · 50.0% (15 of 30 decks)
- Mana Short relevance 3.36 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Catalog relevance 3.34 · 50.0% (15 of 30 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Library of Lat-Nam relevance 3.63 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Anchor to the Aether relevance 3.25 · 50.0% (15 of 30 decks)
EDH data for Living Tsunami: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 30 real decks.