Quest for Pure Flame
Played in 143 Jund decks
630+19+1+17+3+6+1+3+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Vial Smasher the Fierce // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood 2.6% of decks
Vial Smasher the Fierce // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood 2.6% of decks
Vial Smasher the Fierce // Kamahl, Heart of Krosa 3.6% of decks
Vial Smasher the Fierce // Kamahl, Heart of Krosa 3.6% of decks
Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith 2.9% of decks
Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith 2.9% of decks
Vial Smasher the Fierce // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper 2.0% of decks
Vial Smasher the Fierce // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper 2.0% of decks
Krark, the Thumbless // Reyhan, Last of the Abzan 1.6% of decks
Krark, the Thumbless // Reyhan, Last of the Abzan 1.6% of decks
Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper // Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar 1.5% of decks
Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper // Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar 1.5% of decks
Most Relevant
Dictate of the Twin Gods 21.0% of decks
Dictate of the Twin Gods 21.0% of decks
Furnace of Rath 16.8% of decks
Furnace of Rath 16.8% of decks
Angrath's Marauders 18.2% of decks
Angrath's Marauders 18.2% of decks
Fiery Emancipation 20.3% of decks
Fiery Emancipation 20.3% of decks
Insult // Injury 13.3% of decks
Insult // Injury 13.3% of decks
City on Fire 18.9% of decks
City on Fire 18.9% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (6)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 1.68 · 2.6% (11 of 418 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Kamahl, Heart of Krosa relevance 0.51 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 0.48 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.43 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Krark, the Thumbless // Reyhan, Last of the Abzan relevance 0.40 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper // Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar relevance 0.40 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Dictate of the Twin Gods relevance 1.08 · 21.0% (30 of 143 decks)
- Furnace of Rath relevance 1.01 · 16.8% (24 of 143 decks)
- Angrath's Marauders relevance 1.01 · 18.2% (26 of 143 decks)
- Fiery Emancipation relevance 0.88 · 20.3% (29 of 143 decks)
- Insult // Injury relevance 0.86 · 13.3% (19 of 143 decks)
- City on Fire relevance 0.83 · 18.9% (27 of 143 decks)
- Obosh, the Preypiercer relevance 0.81 · 14.0% (20 of 143 decks)
- Gratuitous Violence relevance 0.80 · 16.8% (24 of 143 decks)
- Fiendish Duo relevance 0.79 · 14.0% (20 of 143 decks)
- Solphim, Mayhem Dominus relevance 0.75 · 21.0% (30 of 143 decks)
- The Rollercrusher Ride relevance 0.72 · 14.7% (21 of 143 decks)
- Brash Taunter relevance 0.61 · 18.2% (26 of 143 decks)
- Twinflame Tyrant relevance 0.60 · 14.7% (21 of 143 decks)
- All Will Be One relevance 0.60 · 21.7% (31 of 143 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Druid relevance 0.58 · 18.2% (26 of 143 decks)
- Chandra's Incinerator relevance 0.56 · 9.1% (13 of 143 decks)
- Torbran, Thane of Red Fell relevance 0.54 · 10.5% (15 of 143 decks)
- Boltwave relevance 0.52 · 14.0% (20 of 143 decks)
- Atarka's Command relevance 0.51 · 13.3% (19 of 143 decks)
- Prisoner's Dilemma relevance 0.49 · 8.4% (12 of 143 decks)
- Cindervines relevance 0.49 · 11.9% (17 of 143 decks)
- Rakdos Charm relevance 0.48 · 27.3% (39 of 143 decks)
- Kaervek the Merciless relevance 0.47 · 12.6% (18 of 143 decks)
- Pyrohemia relevance 0.46 · 12.6% (18 of 143 decks)
- Pain for All relevance 0.46 · 12.6% (18 of 143 decks)
- Wound Reflection relevance 0.45 · 11.2% (16 of 143 decks)
- Descent into Avernus relevance 0.44 · 13.3% (19 of 143 decks)
- Heartless Hidetsugu relevance 0.43 · 10.5% (15 of 143 decks)
- Manabarbs relevance 0.43 · 11.9% (17 of 143 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.42 · 16.8% (24 of 143 decks)
All creatures (19)
- Angrath's Marauders relevance 1.01 · 18.2% (26 of 143 decks)
- Obosh, the Preypiercer relevance 0.81 · 14.0% (20 of 143 decks)
- Fiendish Duo relevance 0.79 · 14.0% (20 of 143 decks)
- Solphim, Mayhem Dominus relevance 0.75 · 21.0% (30 of 143 decks)
- Brash Taunter relevance 0.61 · 18.2% (26 of 143 decks)
- Twinflame Tyrant relevance 0.60 · 14.7% (21 of 143 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Druid relevance 0.58 · 18.2% (26 of 143 decks)
- Chandra's Incinerator relevance 0.56 · 9.1% (13 of 143 decks)
- Torbran, Thane of Red Fell relevance 0.54 · 10.5% (15 of 143 decks)
- Kaervek the Merciless relevance 0.47 · 12.6% (18 of 143 decks)
- Heartless Hidetsugu relevance 0.43 · 10.5% (15 of 143 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.42 · 16.8% (24 of 143 decks)
- Florian, Voldaren Scion relevance 0.42 · 7.7% (11 of 143 decks)
- Screaming Nemesis relevance 0.42 · 8.4% (12 of 143 decks)
- Barbflare Gremlin relevance 0.38 · 9.1% (13 of 143 decks)
- Ojer Axonil, Deepest Might // Temple of Power relevance 0.37 · 7.0% (10 of 143 decks)
- Sawhorn Nemesis relevance 0.37 · 8.4% (12 of 143 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.36 · 18.2% (26 of 143 decks)
- Belbe, Corrupted Observer relevance 0.36 · 9.8% (14 of 143 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Requiem Monolith relevance 0.38 · 9.1% (13 of 143 decks)
All enchantments (17)
- Dictate of the Twin Gods relevance 1.08 · 21.0% (30 of 143 decks)
- Furnace of Rath relevance 1.01 · 16.8% (24 of 143 decks)
- Fiery Emancipation relevance 0.88 · 20.3% (29 of 143 decks)
- City on Fire relevance 0.83 · 18.9% (27 of 143 decks)
- Gratuitous Violence relevance 0.80 · 16.8% (24 of 143 decks)
- The Rollercrusher Ride relevance 0.72 · 14.7% (21 of 143 decks)
- All Will Be One relevance 0.60 · 21.7% (31 of 143 decks)
- Cindervines relevance 0.49 · 11.9% (17 of 143 decks)
- Pyrohemia relevance 0.46 · 12.6% (18 of 143 decks)
- Pain for All relevance 0.46 · 12.6% (18 of 143 decks)
- Wound Reflection relevance 0.45 · 11.2% (16 of 143 decks)
- Descent into Avernus relevance 0.44 · 13.3% (19 of 143 decks)
- Manabarbs relevance 0.43 · 11.9% (17 of 143 decks)
- Overabundance relevance 0.41 · 11.2% (16 of 143 decks)
- Citadel of Pain relevance 0.38 · 10.5% (15 of 143 decks)
- Pestilence relevance 0.36 · 9.8% (14 of 143 decks)
- Sulfuric Vortex relevance 0.36 · 7.0% (10 of 143 decks)
All instants (3)
- Atarka's Command relevance 0.51 · 13.3% (19 of 143 decks)
- Rakdos Charm relevance 0.48 · 27.3% (39 of 143 decks)
- Fling relevance 0.40 · 13.3% (19 of 143 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Insult // Injury relevance 0.86 · 13.3% (19 of 143 decks)
- Boltwave relevance 0.52 · 14.0% (20 of 143 decks)
- Prisoner's Dilemma relevance 0.49 · 8.4% (12 of 143 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.42 · 22.4% (32 of 143 decks)
- Flame Rift relevance 0.40 · 10.5% (15 of 143 decks)
- Fiery Confluence relevance 0.37 · 9.8% (14 of 143 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Bloodsoaked Insight // Sanguine Morass relevance 0.36 · 7.7% (11 of 143 decks)
All lands (3)
- Rockfall Vale relevance 0.40 · 23.1% (33 of 143 decks)
- Cragcrown Pathway // Timbercrown Pathway relevance 0.37 · 11.2% (16 of 143 decks)
- Blightstep Pathway // Searstep Pathway relevance 0.36 · 10.5% (15 of 143 decks)
EDH data for Quest for Pure Flame: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 143 real decks.

















































