Profane Command
Played in 5,386 Sultai decks
830+24+1+7+8+9+1+
Color Identity Spread
28.5% Sultai
Commanders
Zaxara, the Exemplary 37.3% of decks
Zaxara, the Exemplary 37.3% of decks
Otrimi, the Ever-Playful 13.4% of decks
Otrimi, the Ever-Playful 13.4% of decks
Sin, Spira's Punishment 6.5% of decks
Sin, Spira's Punishment 6.5% of decks
Jorn, God of Winter // Kaldring, the Rimestaff 2.7% of decks
Jorn, God of Winter // Kaldring, the Rimestaff 2.7% of decks
Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Sengir, the Dark Baron 20.0% of decks
Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Sengir, the Dark Baron 20.0% of decks
Teval, Arbiter of Virtue 1.9% of decks
Teval, Arbiter of Virtue 1.9% of decks
Most Relevant
Hydroid Krasis 74.0% of decks
Hydroid Krasis 74.0% of decks
Unbound Flourishing 68.9% of decks
Unbound Flourishing 68.9% of decks
Animist's Awakening 64.4% of decks
Animist's Awakening 64.4% of decks
Elementalist's Palette 56.7% of decks
Elementalist's Palette 56.7% of decks
Hungering Hydra 57.6% of decks
Hungering Hydra 57.6% of decks
Steelbane Hydra 56.7% of decks
Steelbane Hydra 56.7% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (8)
- Zaxara, the Exemplary relevance 4.46 · 37.3% (4,352 of 11,681 decks)
- Otrimi, the Ever-Playful relevance 1.99 · 13.4% (260 of 1,939 decks)
- Sin, Spira's Punishment relevance 1.35 · 6.5% (228 of 3,519 decks)
- Jorn, God of Winter // Kaldring, the Rimestaff relevance 0.63 · 2.7% (80 of 2,947 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Sengir, the Dark Baron relevance 0.47 · 20.0% (2 of 10 decks)
- Teval, Arbiter of Virtue relevance 0.46 · 1.9% (57 of 2,951 decks)
- Brokkos, Apex of Forever relevance 0.17 · 1.1% (11 of 1,041 decks)
- Ghost of Ramirez DePietro // Reyhan, Last of the Abzan relevance 0.15 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Hydroid Krasis relevance 2.19 · 74.0% (3,983 of 5,386 decks)
- Unbound Flourishing relevance 2.19 · 68.9% (3,711 of 5,386 decks)
- Animist's Awakening relevance 2.16 · 64.4% (3,470 of 5,386 decks)
- Elementalist's Palette relevance 1.99 · 56.7% (3,054 of 5,386 decks)
- Hungering Hydra relevance 1.97 · 57.6% (3,100 of 5,386 decks)
- Steelbane Hydra relevance 1.89 · 56.7% (3,055 of 5,386 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 1.89 · 60.0% (3,232 of 5,386 decks)
- Voracious Hydra relevance 1.87 · 55.1% (2,966 of 5,386 decks)
- Primordial Hydra relevance 1.84 · 56.0% (3,016 of 5,386 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 1.84 · 52.2% (2,813 of 5,386 decks)
- Genesis Hydra relevance 1.81 · 50.8% (2,738 of 5,386 decks)
- The Goose Mother relevance 1.79 · 51.3% (2,765 of 5,386 decks)
- Stonecoil Serpent relevance 1.76 · 50.6% (2,726 of 5,386 decks)
- Exsanguinate relevance 1.74 · 65.8% (3,542 of 5,386 decks)
- Thassa's Intervention relevance 1.73 · 42.4% (2,285 of 5,386 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 1.72 · 50.9% (2,741 of 5,386 decks)
- Gargos, Vicious Watcher relevance 1.70 · 48.0% (2,583 of 5,386 decks)
- Vastwood Hydra relevance 1.69 · 44.8% (2,413 of 5,386 decks)
- Lifeblood Hydra relevance 1.67 · 47.2% (2,543 of 5,386 decks)
- Goldvein Hydra relevance 1.65 · 53.8% (2,900 of 5,386 decks)
- Erebos's Intervention relevance 1.60 · 37.6% (2,027 of 5,386 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 1.60 · 57.9% (3,116 of 5,386 decks)
- Villainous Wealth relevance 1.56 · 72.6% (3,910 of 5,386 decks)
- Mind Spring relevance 1.47 · 35.1% (1,890 of 5,386 decks)
- Mistcutter Hydra relevance 1.47 · 38.8% (2,091 of 5,386 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 1.44 · 41.2% (2,218 of 5,386 decks)
- Condescend relevance 1.41 · 33.7% (1,813 of 5,386 decks)
- Repulsive Mutation relevance 1.37 · 43.2% (2,329 of 5,386 decks)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 1.36 · 43.6% (2,348 of 5,386 decks)
- Nexos relevance 1.36 · 33.6% (1,808 of 5,386 decks)
All creatures (24)
- Hydroid Krasis relevance 2.19 · 74.0% (3,983 of 5,386 decks)
- Hungering Hydra relevance 1.97 · 57.6% (3,100 of 5,386 decks)
- Steelbane Hydra relevance 1.89 · 56.7% (3,055 of 5,386 decks)
- Voracious Hydra relevance 1.87 · 55.1% (2,966 of 5,386 decks)
- Primordial Hydra relevance 1.84 · 56.0% (3,016 of 5,386 decks)
- Genesis Hydra relevance 1.81 · 50.8% (2,738 of 5,386 decks)
- The Goose Mother relevance 1.79 · 51.3% (2,765 of 5,386 decks)
- Stonecoil Serpent relevance 1.76 · 50.6% (2,726 of 5,386 decks)
- Gargos, Vicious Watcher relevance 1.70 · 48.0% (2,583 of 5,386 decks)
- Vastwood Hydra relevance 1.69 · 44.8% (2,413 of 5,386 decks)
- Lifeblood Hydra relevance 1.67 · 47.2% (2,543 of 5,386 decks)
- Goldvein Hydra relevance 1.65 · 53.8% (2,900 of 5,386 decks)
- Mistcutter Hydra relevance 1.47 · 38.8% (2,091 of 5,386 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 1.44 · 41.2% (2,218 of 5,386 decks)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 1.36 · 43.6% (2,348 of 5,386 decks)
- Nexos relevance 1.36 · 33.6% (1,808 of 5,386 decks)
- Hooded Hydra relevance 1.34 · 36.7% (1,975 of 5,386 decks)
- Nyxborn Hydra relevance 1.30 · 33.8% (1,820 of 5,386 decks)
- Protean Hydra relevance 1.20 · 29.4% (1,585 of 5,386 decks)
- Corpsejack Menace relevance 1.19 · 49.8% (2,683 of 5,386 decks)
- Neverwinter Hydra relevance 1.12 · 26.6% (1,433 of 5,386 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 1.09 · 39.7% (2,136 of 5,386 decks)
- Capricopian relevance 1.04 · 23.2% (1,252 of 5,386 decks)
- Benevolent Hydra relevance 1.01 · 25.5% (1,372 of 5,386 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Elementalist's Palette relevance 1.99 · 56.7% (3,054 of 5,386 decks)
All enchantments (7)
- Unbound Flourishing relevance 2.19 · 68.9% (3,711 of 5,386 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 1.60 · 57.9% (3,116 of 5,386 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 1.17 · 35.9% (1,931 of 5,386 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 1.15 · 43.4% (2,339 of 5,386 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 1.06 · 32.1% (1,730 of 5,386 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 1.06 · 46.0% (2,476 of 5,386 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.99 · 32.2% (1,732 of 5,386 decks)
All instants (8)
- Thassa's Intervention relevance 1.73 · 42.4% (2,285 of 5,386 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 1.72 · 50.9% (2,741 of 5,386 decks)
- Erebos's Intervention relevance 1.60 · 37.6% (2,027 of 5,386 decks)
- Condescend relevance 1.41 · 33.7% (1,813 of 5,386 decks)
- Repulsive Mutation relevance 1.37 · 43.2% (2,329 of 5,386 decks)
- Syncopate relevance 1.32 · 33.1% (1,784 of 5,386 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 1.15 · 28.8% (1,552 of 5,386 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.95 · 40.2% (2,164 of 5,386 decks)
All sorceries (9)
- Animist's Awakening relevance 2.16 · 64.4% (3,470 of 5,386 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 1.89 · 60.0% (3,232 of 5,386 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 1.84 · 52.2% (2,813 of 5,386 decks)
- Exsanguinate relevance 1.74 · 65.8% (3,542 of 5,386 decks)
- Villainous Wealth relevance 1.56 · 72.6% (3,910 of 5,386 decks)
- Mind Spring relevance 1.47 · 35.1% (1,890 of 5,386 decks)
- Torment of Hailfire relevance 1.33 · 44.9% (2,421 of 5,386 decks)
- Open into Wonder relevance 0.96 · 20.4% (1,100 of 5,386 decks)
- Blue Sun's Twilight relevance 0.95 · 20.7% (1,116 of 5,386 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.96 · 22.4% (1,204 of 5,386 decks)
EDH data for Profane Command: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 5,386 real decks.













































