Teardrop Kami
Played in 65 Bant decks
30+41+2+2+2+1+2+
Color Identity Spread
4.0% Bant
Most Relevant
Bounding Krasis 53.8% of decks
Bounding Krasis 53.8% of decks
Aura of Dominion 52.3% of decks
Aura of Dominion 52.3% of decks
Corridor Monitor 50.8% of decks
Corridor Monitor 50.8% of decks
Ulvenwald Oddity // Ulvenwald Behemoth 47.7% of decks
Ulvenwald Oddity // Ulvenwald Behemoth 47.7% of decks
Deceiver Exarch 47.7% of decks
Deceiver Exarch 47.7% of decks
Primordial Sage 49.2% of decks
Primordial Sage 49.2% of decks
All most relevant (30)
- Bounding Krasis relevance 3.62 · 53.8% (35 of 65 decks)
- Aura of Dominion relevance 3.46 · 52.3% (34 of 65 decks)
- Corridor Monitor relevance 3.41 · 50.8% (33 of 65 decks)
- Ulvenwald Oddity // Ulvenwald Behemoth relevance 2.93 · 47.7% (31 of 65 decks)
- Deceiver Exarch relevance 2.92 · 47.7% (31 of 65 decks)
- Primordial Sage relevance 2.89 · 49.2% (32 of 65 decks)
- Verdurous Gearhulk relevance 2.84 · 47.7% (31 of 65 decks)
- Breaching Hippocamp relevance 2.84 · 60.0% (39 of 65 decks)
- Ezzaroot Channeler relevance 2.83 · 46.2% (30 of 65 decks)
- Fade from History relevance 2.65 · 38.5% (25 of 65 decks)
- Village Bell-Ringer relevance 2.64 · 52.3% (34 of 65 decks)
- Runadi, Behemoth Caller relevance 2.56 · 43.1% (28 of 65 decks)
- Great Oak Guardian relevance 2.51 · 53.8% (35 of 65 decks)
- Selvala, Eager Trailblazer relevance 2.38 · 47.7% (31 of 65 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 2.38 · 60.0% (39 of 65 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 2.36 · 44.6% (29 of 65 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 2.34 · 47.7% (31 of 65 decks)
- Keruga, the Macrosage relevance 2.23 · 49.2% (32 of 65 decks)
- Tidespout Tyrant relevance 2.21 · 46.2% (30 of 65 decks)
- Defiler of Vigor relevance 2.17 · 53.8% (35 of 65 decks)
- Saryth, the Viper's Fang relevance 2.16 · 63.1% (41 of 65 decks)
- Kiora's Follower relevance 2.08 · 67.7% (44 of 65 decks)
- Clement, the Worrywort relevance 2.06 · 40.0% (26 of 65 decks)
- Chakram Retriever relevance 2.05 · 61.5% (40 of 65 decks)
- Hamza, Guardian of Arashin relevance 2.04 · 52.3% (34 of 65 decks)
- Radagast the Brown relevance 2.00 · 36.9% (24 of 65 decks)
- Stunt Double relevance 1.94 · 47.7% (31 of 65 decks)
- Naga Fleshcrafter relevance 1.94 · 44.6% (29 of 65 decks)
- Undercover Operative relevance 1.94 · 41.5% (27 of 65 decks)
- Vizier of Many Faces relevance 1.92 · 43.1% (28 of 65 decks)
All creatures (41)
- Bounding Krasis relevance 3.62 · 53.8% (35 of 65 decks)
- Corridor Monitor relevance 3.41 · 50.8% (33 of 65 decks)
- Ulvenwald Oddity // Ulvenwald Behemoth relevance 2.93 · 47.7% (31 of 65 decks)
- Deceiver Exarch relevance 2.92 · 47.7% (31 of 65 decks)
- Primordial Sage relevance 2.89 · 49.2% (32 of 65 decks)
- Verdurous Gearhulk relevance 2.84 · 47.7% (31 of 65 decks)
- Breaching Hippocamp relevance 2.84 · 60.0% (39 of 65 decks)
- Ezzaroot Channeler relevance 2.83 · 46.2% (30 of 65 decks)
- Village Bell-Ringer relevance 2.64 · 52.3% (34 of 65 decks)
- Runadi, Behemoth Caller relevance 2.56 · 43.1% (28 of 65 decks)
- Great Oak Guardian relevance 2.51 · 53.8% (35 of 65 decks)
- Selvala, Eager Trailblazer relevance 2.38 · 47.7% (31 of 65 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 2.36 · 44.6% (29 of 65 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 2.34 · 47.7% (31 of 65 decks)
- Keruga, the Macrosage relevance 2.23 · 49.2% (32 of 65 decks)
- Tidespout Tyrant relevance 2.21 · 46.2% (30 of 65 decks)
- Defiler of Vigor relevance 2.17 · 53.8% (35 of 65 decks)
- Saryth, the Viper's Fang relevance 2.16 · 63.1% (41 of 65 decks)
- Kiora's Follower relevance 2.08 · 67.7% (44 of 65 decks)
- Clement, the Worrywort relevance 2.06 · 40.0% (26 of 65 decks)
- Chakram Retriever relevance 2.05 · 61.5% (40 of 65 decks)
- Hamza, Guardian of Arashin relevance 2.04 · 52.3% (34 of 65 decks)
- Radagast the Brown relevance 2.00 · 36.9% (24 of 65 decks)
- Stunt Double relevance 1.94 · 47.7% (31 of 65 decks)
- Naga Fleshcrafter relevance 1.94 · 44.6% (29 of 65 decks)
- Undercover Operative relevance 1.94 · 41.5% (27 of 65 decks)
- Vizier of Many Faces relevance 1.92 · 43.1% (28 of 65 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 1.89 · 55.4% (36 of 65 decks)
- Silverback Elder relevance 1.87 · 50.8% (33 of 65 decks)
- Clone relevance 1.85 · 43.1% (28 of 65 decks)
- Conclave Mentor relevance 1.82 · 52.3% (34 of 65 decks)
- Foundation Breaker relevance 1.81 · 46.2% (30 of 65 decks)
- Valley Floodcaller relevance 1.80 · 44.6% (29 of 65 decks)
- Inga and Esika relevance 1.77 · 63.1% (41 of 65 decks)
- Shalai, Voice of Plenty relevance 1.72 · 61.5% (40 of 65 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 1.59 · 55.4% (36 of 65 decks)
- Ms. Bumbleflower relevance 1.55 · 38.5% (25 of 65 decks)
- Derevi, Empyrial Tactician relevance 1.43 · 47.7% (31 of 65 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 1.39 · 56.9% (37 of 65 decks)
- Chulane, Teller of Tales relevance 1.34 · 55.4% (36 of 65 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.24 · 41.5% (27 of 65 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Aura of Dominion relevance 3.46 · 52.3% (34 of 65 decks)
- Communal Brewing relevance 1.27 · 47.7% (31 of 65 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Fade from History relevance 2.65 · 38.5% (25 of 65 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 1.24 · 46.2% (30 of 65 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 1.41 · 47.7% (31 of 65 decks)
All lands (2)
- Flood Plain relevance 1.85 · 40.0% (26 of 65 decks)
- Idyllic Beachfront relevance 1.19 · 43.1% (28 of 65 decks)
EDH data for Teardrop Kami: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 65 real decks.
























