Sinister Possession
Played in 82 Mardu decks
Color Identity Spread
5.0% Mardu
All commanders (1)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Ardenn, Intrepid Archaeologist relevance 0.71 · 1.0% (2 of 194 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Parasitic Impetus relevance 2.23 · 45.1% (37 of 82 decks)
- Blood Reckoning relevance 1.69 · 29.3% (24 of 82 decks)
- Revenge of Ravens relevance 1.65 · 37.8% (31 of 82 decks)
- Shiny Impetus relevance 1.62 · 46.3% (38 of 82 decks)
- Hissing Miasma relevance 1.52 · 26.8% (22 of 82 decks)
- Songbirds' Blessing relevance 1.34 · 19.5% (16 of 82 decks)
- Martial Impetus relevance 1.22 · 23.2% (19 of 82 decks)
- Marchesa's Decree relevance 1.16 · 29.3% (24 of 82 decks)
- Killian, Decisive Mentor relevance 1.14 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Coercive Impetus relevance 1.14 · 22.0% (18 of 82 decks)
- Curse of Disturbance relevance 1.07 · 22.0% (18 of 82 decks)
- Curse of Opulence relevance 1.05 · 37.8% (31 of 82 decks)
- Vengeful Ancestor relevance 1.02 · 24.4% (20 of 82 decks)
- Cunning Rhetoric relevance 1.01 · 22.0% (18 of 82 decks)
- Kazuul, Tyrant of the Cliffs relevance 0.96 · 26.8% (22 of 82 decks)
- Mesa Enchantress relevance 0.95 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Slumbering Dragon relevance 0.94 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
- Ghoulish Impetus relevance 0.94 · 20.7% (17 of 82 decks)
- Scriv, the Obligator relevance 0.94 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Curse of Vitality relevance 0.93 · 17.1% (14 of 82 decks)
- Righteous Cause relevance 0.90 · 15.9% (13 of 82 decks)
- Search the Premises relevance 0.89 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
- Unquenchable Fury relevance 0.88 · 17.1% (14 of 82 decks)
- Circle of Flame relevance 0.88 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
- Curse of Shallow Graves relevance 0.88 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
- Tomik, Wielder of Law relevance 0.86 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Eriette of the Charmed Apple relevance 0.78 · 12.2% (10 of 82 decks)
- Curse of Chaos relevance 0.74 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Starfield Mystic relevance 0.71 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
- Calculating Lich relevance 0.71 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
All creatures (19)
- Killian, Decisive Mentor relevance 1.14 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Vengeful Ancestor relevance 1.02 · 24.4% (20 of 82 decks)
- Kazuul, Tyrant of the Cliffs relevance 0.96 · 26.8% (22 of 82 decks)
- Mesa Enchantress relevance 0.95 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Slumbering Dragon relevance 0.94 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
- Scriv, the Obligator relevance 0.94 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Tomik, Wielder of Law relevance 0.86 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Eriette of the Charmed Apple relevance 0.78 · 12.2% (10 of 82 decks)
- Starfield Mystic relevance 0.71 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
- Calculating Lich relevance 0.71 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Emberwilde Captain relevance 0.69 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Karazikar, the Eye Tyrant relevance 0.67 · 19.5% (16 of 82 decks)
- Aurelia, the Law Above relevance 0.66 · 25.6% (21 of 82 decks)
- Killian, Ink Duelist relevance 0.58 · 9.8% (8 of 82 decks)
- Sram, Senior Edificer relevance 0.56 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
- Death Kiss relevance 0.55 · 9.8% (8 of 82 decks)
- Mangara, the Diplomat relevance 0.54 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Sun Titan relevance 0.50 · 23.2% (19 of 82 decks)
- Agitator Ant relevance 0.50 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.63 · 24.4% (20 of 82 decks)
- Explorer's Scope relevance 0.54 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Bloodthirsty Blade relevance 0.50 · 12.2% (10 of 82 decks)
All enchantments (26)
- Parasitic Impetus relevance 2.23 · 45.1% (37 of 82 decks)
- Blood Reckoning relevance 1.69 · 29.3% (24 of 82 decks)
- Revenge of Ravens relevance 1.65 · 37.8% (31 of 82 decks)
- Shiny Impetus relevance 1.62 · 46.3% (38 of 82 decks)
- Hissing Miasma relevance 1.52 · 26.8% (22 of 82 decks)
- Songbirds' Blessing relevance 1.34 · 19.5% (16 of 82 decks)
- Martial Impetus relevance 1.22 · 23.2% (19 of 82 decks)
- Marchesa's Decree relevance 1.16 · 29.3% (24 of 82 decks)
- Coercive Impetus relevance 1.14 · 22.0% (18 of 82 decks)
- Curse of Disturbance relevance 1.07 · 22.0% (18 of 82 decks)
- Curse of Opulence relevance 1.05 · 37.8% (31 of 82 decks)
- Cunning Rhetoric relevance 1.01 · 22.0% (18 of 82 decks)
- Ghoulish Impetus relevance 0.94 · 20.7% (17 of 82 decks)
- Curse of Vitality relevance 0.93 · 17.1% (14 of 82 decks)
- Righteous Cause relevance 0.90 · 15.9% (13 of 82 decks)
- Search the Premises relevance 0.89 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
- Unquenchable Fury relevance 0.88 · 17.1% (14 of 82 decks)
- Circle of Flame relevance 0.88 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
- Curse of Shallow Graves relevance 0.88 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
- Curse of Chaos relevance 0.74 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Acquired Mutation relevance 0.69 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Redemption Arc relevance 0.64 · 12.2% (10 of 82 decks)
- Incriminating Impetus relevance 0.62 · 9.8% (8 of 82 decks)
- The Sound of Drums relevance 0.58 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Sphere of Safety relevance 0.49 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Eye of Nidhogg relevance 0.49 · 9.8% (8 of 82 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Hall of Heliod's Generosity relevance 0.54 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
All lands (1)
- Bloodfell Caves relevance 0.58 · 22.0% (18 of 82 decks)
EDH data for Sinister Possession: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 82 real decks.