230+24+4+11+4+6+1+
Color Identity Spread
20.9% Azorius
Commanders
Most Relevant
Peach Garden Oath 87.5% of decks
Peach Garden Oath 87.5% of decks
Lu Xun, Scholar General 75.0% of decks
Lu Xun, Scholar General 75.0% of decks
Peri Brown 70.8% of decks
Peri Brown 70.8% of decks
False Defeat 70.8% of decks
False Defeat 70.8% of decks
Penance 70.8% of decks
Penance 70.8% of decks
Sun Quan, Lord of Wu 79.2% of decks
Sun Quan, Lord of Wu 79.2% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Ghost of Ramirez DePietro // Ardenn, Intrepid Archaeologist relevance 0.95 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Jedit Ojanen relevance 0.67 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Peach Garden Oath relevance 5.44 · 87.5% (21 of 24 decks)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 5.10 · 75.0% (18 of 24 decks)
- Peri Brown relevance 4.88 · 70.8% (17 of 24 decks)
- False Defeat relevance 4.76 · 70.8% (17 of 24 decks)
- Penance relevance 4.70 · 70.8% (17 of 24 decks)
- Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 4.64 · 79.2% (19 of 24 decks)
- Brilliant Plan relevance 4.59 · 66.7% (16 of 24 decks)
- Patriot, Shield Wielder relevance 4.58 · 66.7% (16 of 24 decks)
- Empty City Ruse relevance 4.51 · 66.7% (16 of 24 decks)
- Patrician's Scorn relevance 4.47 · 66.7% (16 of 24 decks)
- Pol Jamaar, Illusionist relevance 4.44 · 66.7% (16 of 24 decks)
- Myojin of Cryptic Dreams relevance 4.38 · 70.8% (17 of 24 decks)
- Neerdiv, Devious Diver relevance 4.36 · 66.7% (16 of 24 decks)
- Null Rod relevance 4.31 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Nahiri, the Lithomancer relevance 4.30 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Near-Death Experience relevance 4.29 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Portcullis relevance 4.28 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Overwhelming Intellect relevance 4.28 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Nomads' Assembly relevance 4.28 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Noble Purpose relevance 4.28 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Oblivion Sower relevance 4.25 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Opportunity relevance 4.24 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Loyal Retainers relevance 4.24 · 66.7% (16 of 24 decks)
- Nardole, Resourceful Cyborg relevance 4.22 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Parallax Tide relevance 4.19 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Oath of Gideon relevance 4.19 · 66.7% (16 of 24 decks)
- Octavia, Living Thesis relevance 4.18 · 75.0% (18 of 24 decks)
- Patron Wizard relevance 4.17 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Pendrell Mists relevance 4.17 · 66.7% (16 of 24 decks)
- Overflowing Insight relevance 4.17 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
All creatures (24)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 5.10 · 75.0% (18 of 24 decks)
- Peri Brown relevance 4.88 · 70.8% (17 of 24 decks)
- Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 4.64 · 79.2% (19 of 24 decks)
- Patriot, Shield Wielder relevance 4.58 · 66.7% (16 of 24 decks)
- Pol Jamaar, Illusionist relevance 4.44 · 66.7% (16 of 24 decks)
- Myojin of Cryptic Dreams relevance 4.38 · 70.8% (17 of 24 decks)
- Neerdiv, Devious Diver relevance 4.36 · 66.7% (16 of 24 decks)
- Oblivion Sower relevance 4.25 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Loyal Retainers relevance 4.24 · 66.7% (16 of 24 decks)
- Nardole, Resourceful Cyborg relevance 4.22 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Octavia, Living Thesis relevance 4.18 · 75.0% (18 of 24 decks)
- Patron Wizard relevance 4.17 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Page, Loose Leaf relevance 4.16 · 66.7% (16 of 24 decks)
- Osgood, Operation Double relevance 4.16 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Nyssa of Traken relevance 4.12 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Myojin of Blooming Dawn relevance 4.11 · 66.7% (16 of 24 decks)
- Palace Sentinels relevance 4.10 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Peacekeeper relevance 4.10 · 66.7% (16 of 24 decks)
- Okoye, Dora Milaje Leader relevance 4.07 · 66.7% (16 of 24 decks)
- Nurturing Pixie relevance 4.07 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Owl Familiar relevance 4.05 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Pack Leader relevance 4.02 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Pathrazer of Ulamog relevance 4.02 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Phantom General relevance 4.01 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Null Rod relevance 4.31 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Portcullis relevance 4.28 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Pentad Prism relevance 4.14 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Orb of Dreams relevance 4.01 · 58.3% (14 of 24 decks)
All enchantments (11)
- Penance relevance 4.70 · 70.8% (17 of 24 decks)
- Near-Death Experience relevance 4.29 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Noble Purpose relevance 4.28 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Parallax Tide relevance 4.19 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Oath of Gideon relevance 4.19 · 66.7% (16 of 24 decks)
- Pendrell Mists relevance 4.17 · 66.7% (16 of 24 decks)
- Path of Bravery relevance 4.16 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Opalescence relevance 4.15 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Mystic Barrier relevance 4.10 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Patient Rebuilding relevance 4.04 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Nightmares and Daydreams relevance 4.01 · 58.3% (14 of 24 decks)
All instants (4)
- Patrician's Scorn relevance 4.47 · 66.7% (16 of 24 decks)
- Overwhelming Intellect relevance 4.28 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Opportunity relevance 4.24 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Panther Pounce relevance 4.11 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Peach Garden Oath relevance 5.44 · 87.5% (21 of 24 decks)
- False Defeat relevance 4.76 · 70.8% (17 of 24 decks)
- Brilliant Plan relevance 4.59 · 66.7% (16 of 24 decks)
- Empty City Ruse relevance 4.51 · 66.7% (16 of 24 decks)
- Nomads' Assembly relevance 4.28 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Overflowing Insight relevance 4.17 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Nahiri, the Lithomancer relevance 4.30 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
EDH data for Pang Tong, "Young Phoenix": adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 24 real decks.













































