Curse of Predation
Played in 296 Gruul decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (11)
- Wulfgar of Icewind Dale relevance 1.79 · 2.6% (24 of 919 decks)
- Chishiro, the Shattered Blade relevance 1.47 · 1.1% (36 of 3,249 decks)
- Ellie, Brick Master // Abby, Merciless Soldier relevance 1.43 · 7.1% (6 of 85 decks)
- Kaima, the Fractured Calm relevance 1.16 · 1.4% (13 of 962 decks)
- Raised by Giants // Baeloth Barrityl, Entertainer relevance 1.09 · 1.1% (14 of 1,307 decks)
- Tahngarth, First Mate relevance 0.91 · 1.3% (7 of 529 decks)
- Baeloth Barrityl, Entertainer // Master Chef relevance 0.65 · 3.2% (2 of 62 decks)
- Red XIII, Proud Warrior relevance 0.63 · 1.5% (3 of 206 decks)
- Amber Gristle O'Maul // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 0.56 · 10.0% (1 of 10 decks)
- Raised by Giants // Wyll, Blade of Frontiers relevance 0.35 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.33 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Curse of Opulence relevance 1.35 · 39.2% (116 of 296 decks)
- Curse of Bounty relevance 1.31 · 23.3% (69 of 296 decks)
- Curse of Hospitality relevance 1.08 · 16.9% (50 of 296 decks)
- Curse of Bloodletting relevance 0.78 · 11.8% (35 of 296 decks)
- Shiny Impetus relevance 0.72 · 17.6% (52 of 296 decks)
- Curse of Shaken Faith relevance 0.71 · 10.5% (31 of 296 decks)
- Disrupt Decorum relevance 0.52 · 12.8% (38 of 296 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.52 · 18.2% (54 of 296 decks)
- Ordeal of Nylea relevance 0.47 · 11.5% (34 of 296 decks)
- Tanglespan Lookout relevance 0.47 · 10.1% (30 of 296 decks)
- Thundering Raiju relevance 0.46 · 11.1% (33 of 296 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.45 · 15.2% (45 of 296 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.45 · 17.2% (51 of 296 decks)
- Setessan Champion relevance 0.45 · 12.5% (37 of 296 decks)
- Grumgully, the Generous relevance 0.44 · 15.5% (46 of 296 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.44 · 18.9% (56 of 296 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.42 · 20.3% (60 of 296 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.42 · 16.9% (50 of 296 decks)
- Vow of Wildness relevance 0.41 · 7.4% (22 of 296 decks)
- Bloodthirsty Blade relevance 0.40 · 7.4% (22 of 296 decks)
- Sticky Fingers relevance 0.40 · 10.5% (31 of 296 decks)
- Agitator Ant relevance 0.40 · 9.5% (28 of 296 decks)
- Rubblebelt Raiders relevance 0.40 · 7.1% (21 of 296 decks)
- Lion Umbra relevance 0.40 · 9.8% (29 of 296 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.39 · 12.2% (36 of 296 decks)
- Alpha Authority relevance 0.39 · 10.1% (30 of 296 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.39 · 13.2% (39 of 296 decks)
- Halana and Alena, Partners relevance 0.39 · 15.5% (46 of 296 decks)
- Colossification relevance 0.39 · 9.1% (27 of 296 decks)
- Ancestral Mask relevance 0.38 · 9.1% (27 of 296 decks)
All creatures (16)
- Tanglespan Lookout relevance 0.47 · 10.1% (30 of 296 decks)
- Thundering Raiju relevance 0.46 · 11.1% (33 of 296 decks)
- Setessan Champion relevance 0.45 · 12.5% (37 of 296 decks)
- Grumgully, the Generous relevance 0.44 · 15.5% (46 of 296 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.42 · 16.9% (50 of 296 decks)
- Agitator Ant relevance 0.40 · 9.5% (28 of 296 decks)
- Rubblebelt Raiders relevance 0.40 · 7.1% (21 of 296 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.39 · 12.2% (36 of 296 decks)
- Halana and Alena, Partners relevance 0.39 · 15.5% (46 of 296 decks)
- Renata, Called to the Hunt relevance 0.38 · 9.1% (27 of 296 decks)
- Red XIII, Proud Warrior relevance 0.38 · 10.8% (32 of 296 decks)
- Grand Warlord Radha relevance 0.38 · 10.8% (32 of 296 decks)
- Vengeful Ancestor relevance 0.38 · 8.8% (26 of 296 decks)
- Tuya Bearclaw relevance 0.37 · 8.4% (25 of 296 decks)
- Frontier Warmonger relevance 0.36 · 7.4% (22 of 296 decks)
- Krenko, Tin Street Kingpin relevance 0.36 · 9.8% (29 of 296 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Bloodthirsty Blade relevance 0.40 · 7.4% (22 of 296 decks)
All enchantments (24)
- Curse of Opulence relevance 1.35 · 39.2% (116 of 296 decks)
- Curse of Bounty relevance 1.31 · 23.3% (69 of 296 decks)
- Curse of Hospitality relevance 1.08 · 16.9% (50 of 296 decks)
- Curse of Bloodletting relevance 0.78 · 11.8% (35 of 296 decks)
- Shiny Impetus relevance 0.72 · 17.6% (52 of 296 decks)
- Curse of Shaken Faith relevance 0.71 · 10.5% (31 of 296 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.52 · 18.2% (54 of 296 decks)
- Ordeal of Nylea relevance 0.47 · 11.5% (34 of 296 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.45 · 15.2% (45 of 296 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.45 · 17.2% (51 of 296 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.42 · 20.3% (60 of 296 decks)
- Vow of Wildness relevance 0.41 · 7.4% (22 of 296 decks)
- Sticky Fingers relevance 0.40 · 10.5% (31 of 296 decks)
- Lion Umbra relevance 0.40 · 9.8% (29 of 296 decks)
- Alpha Authority relevance 0.39 · 10.1% (30 of 296 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.39 · 13.2% (39 of 296 decks)
- Colossification relevance 0.39 · 9.1% (27 of 296 decks)
- Ancestral Mask relevance 0.38 · 9.1% (27 of 296 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.37 · 10.1% (30 of 296 decks)
- Enchantress's Presence relevance 0.36 · 10.1% (30 of 296 decks)
- The Sound of Drums relevance 0.36 · 7.1% (21 of 296 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.36 · 13.5% (40 of 296 decks)
- Vow of Lightning relevance 0.35 · 6.1% (18 of 296 decks)
- Unquenchable Fury relevance 0.35 · 7.8% (23 of 296 decks)
All instants (2)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.44 · 18.9% (56 of 296 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.37 · 17.2% (51 of 296 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Disrupt Decorum relevance 0.52 · 12.8% (38 of 296 decks)
- Spectacular Showdown relevance 0.38 · 7.8% (23 of 296 decks)
- Smoke Spirits' Aid relevance 0.37 · 8.1% (24 of 296 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Temple of Abandon relevance 0.43 · 31.8% (94 of 296 decks)
All lands (3)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.44 · 19.3% (57 of 296 decks)
- Mossfire Valley relevance 0.40 · 32.4% (96 of 296 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.35 · 23.0% (68 of 296 decks)
EDH data for Curse of Predation: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 296 real decks.