Wu Longbowman
Played in 128 Blue decks
1030+20+6+15+2+4+2+1+
Color Identity Spread
44.9% Blue
Commanders
Reveka, Wizard Savant 43.3% of decks
Reveka, Wizard Savant 43.3% of decks
Lu Xun, Scholar General 9.9% of decks
Lu Xun, Scholar General 9.9% of decks
Sun Quan, Lord of Wu 2.6% of decks
Sun Quan, Lord of Wu 2.6% of decks
Ioreth of the Healing House 4.7% of decks
Ioreth of the Healing House 4.7% of decks
V'Ger, the Intruder 50.0% of decks
V'Ger, the Intruder 50.0% of decks
Lu Meng, Wu General 20.0% of decks
Lu Meng, Wu General 20.0% of decks
Most Relevant
Rootwater Hunter 65.6% of decks
Rootwater Hunter 65.6% of decks
Thornwind Faeries 65.6% of decks
Thornwind Faeries 65.6% of decks
Zuran Spellcaster 66.4% of decks
Zuran Spellcaster 66.4% of decks
Suq'Ata Firewalker 60.9% of decks
Suq'Ata Firewalker 60.9% of decks
Prodigal Sorcerer 67.2% of decks
Prodigal Sorcerer 67.2% of decks
Backfire 35.9% of decks
Backfire 35.9% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (10)
- Reveka, Wizard Savant relevance 4.61 · 43.3% (45 of 104 decks)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 2.22 · 9.9% (10 of 101 decks)
- Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 2.21 · 2.6% (25 of 960 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 1.64 · 4.7% (7 of 149 decks)
- V'Ger, the Intruder relevance 0.85 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Lu Meng, Wu General relevance 0.73 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Lu Su, Wu Advisor relevance 0.69 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Stockman, Mad Fly-entist relevance 0.69 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Zhuge Jin, Wu Strategist relevance 0.60 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Volo, Itinerant Scholar relevance 0.43 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Rootwater Hunter relevance 4.27 · 65.6% (84 of 128 decks)
- Thornwind Faeries relevance 4.26 · 65.6% (84 of 128 decks)
- Zuran Spellcaster relevance 4.20 · 66.4% (85 of 128 decks)
- Suq'Ata Firewalker relevance 4.03 · 60.9% (78 of 128 decks)
- Prodigal Sorcerer relevance 3.71 · 67.2% (86 of 128 decks)
- Backfire relevance 2.43 · 35.9% (46 of 128 decks)
- Soul Barrier relevance 2.36 · 36.7% (47 of 128 decks)
- Mind Bomb relevance 2.36 · 38.3% (49 of 128 decks)
- Psionic Blast relevance 2.34 · 36.7% (47 of 128 decks)
- Charisma relevance 2.23 · 33.6% (43 of 128 decks)
- Tandem Lookout relevance 1.95 · 37.5% (48 of 128 decks)
- Sigil of Sleep relevance 1.94 · 34.4% (44 of 128 decks)
- Wu Scout relevance 1.84 · 27.3% (35 of 128 decks)
- Ophidian Eye relevance 1.81 · 31.3% (40 of 128 decks)
- Willbreaker relevance 1.75 · 36.7% (47 of 128 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 1.71 · 37.5% (48 of 128 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 1.59 · 45.3% (58 of 128 decks)
- Viridian Longbow relevance 1.58 · 27.3% (35 of 128 decks)
- Psionic Gift relevance 1.53 · 27.3% (35 of 128 decks)
- Fatestitcher relevance 1.50 · 36.7% (47 of 128 decks)
- Dismiss into Dream relevance 1.47 · 28.9% (37 of 128 decks)
- Hermetic Study relevance 1.46 · 27.3% (35 of 128 decks)
- Forensic Researcher relevance 1.41 · 32.0% (41 of 128 decks)
- Cowardice relevance 1.35 · 22.7% (29 of 128 decks)
- Kelpie Guide relevance 1.27 · 32.8% (42 of 128 decks)
- Illusionist's Bracers relevance 1.25 · 32.0% (41 of 128 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 1.24 · 35.9% (46 of 128 decks)
- Aphetto Alchemist relevance 1.17 · 33.6% (43 of 128 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 1.14 · 32.0% (41 of 128 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 1.13 · 23.4% (30 of 128 decks)
All creatures (20)
- Rootwater Hunter relevance 4.27 · 65.6% (84 of 128 decks)
- Thornwind Faeries relevance 4.26 · 65.6% (84 of 128 decks)
- Zuran Spellcaster relevance 4.20 · 66.4% (85 of 128 decks)
- Suq'Ata Firewalker relevance 4.03 · 60.9% (78 of 128 decks)
- Prodigal Sorcerer relevance 3.71 · 67.2% (86 of 128 decks)
- Tandem Lookout relevance 1.95 · 37.5% (48 of 128 decks)
- Wu Scout relevance 1.84 · 27.3% (35 of 128 decks)
- Willbreaker relevance 1.75 · 36.7% (47 of 128 decks)
- Fatestitcher relevance 1.50 · 36.7% (47 of 128 decks)
- Forensic Researcher relevance 1.41 · 32.0% (41 of 128 decks)
- Kelpie Guide relevance 1.27 · 32.8% (42 of 128 decks)
- Aphetto Alchemist relevance 1.17 · 33.6% (43 of 128 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 1.14 · 32.0% (41 of 128 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 1.05 · 31.3% (40 of 128 decks)
- Marvin, Murderous Mimic relevance 1.03 · 30.5% (39 of 128 decks)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 1.00 · 18.0% (23 of 128 decks)
- Arcanis the Omnipotent relevance 0.92 · 32.0% (41 of 128 decks)
- Beguiler of Wills relevance 0.88 · 17.2% (22 of 128 decks)
- Gogo, Master of Mimicry relevance 0.86 · 21.9% (28 of 128 decks)
- Endbringer relevance 0.78 · 12.5% (16 of 128 decks)
All artifacts (6)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 1.71 · 37.5% (48 of 128 decks)
- Viridian Longbow relevance 1.58 · 27.3% (35 of 128 decks)
- Illusionist's Bracers relevance 1.25 · 32.0% (41 of 128 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 1.07 · 32.0% (41 of 128 decks)
- Patriar's Seal relevance 0.90 · 22.7% (29 of 128 decks)
- Staff of Nin relevance 0.74 · 13.3% (17 of 128 decks)
All enchantments (15)
- Backfire relevance 2.43 · 35.9% (46 of 128 decks)
- Soul Barrier relevance 2.36 · 36.7% (47 of 128 decks)
- Charisma relevance 2.23 · 33.6% (43 of 128 decks)
- Sigil of Sleep relevance 1.94 · 34.4% (44 of 128 decks)
- Ophidian Eye relevance 1.81 · 31.3% (40 of 128 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 1.59 · 45.3% (58 of 128 decks)
- Psionic Gift relevance 1.53 · 27.3% (35 of 128 decks)
- Dismiss into Dream relevance 1.47 · 28.9% (37 of 128 decks)
- Hermetic Study relevance 1.46 · 27.3% (35 of 128 decks)
- Cowardice relevance 1.35 · 22.7% (29 of 128 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 1.24 · 35.9% (46 of 128 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 1.07 · 29.7% (38 of 128 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 1.05 · 38.3% (49 of 128 decks)
- Shadow of the Second Sun relevance 0.81 · 21.9% (28 of 128 decks)
- Pemmin's Aura relevance 0.77 · 20.3% (26 of 128 decks)
All instants (2)
- Psionic Blast relevance 2.34 · 36.7% (47 of 128 decks)
- Turnabout relevance 1.07 · 29.7% (38 of 128 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Mind Bomb relevance 2.36 · 38.3% (49 of 128 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 1.13 · 23.4% (30 of 128 decks)
- Brilliant Plan relevance 1.02 · 14.8% (19 of 128 decks)
- Exhaustion relevance 0.78 · 13.3% (17 of 128 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Detection Tower relevance 0.90 · 18.8% (24 of 128 decks)
- Soldevi Excavations relevance 0.82 · 16.4% (21 of 128 decks)
All lands (1)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.86 · 23.4% (30 of 128 decks)
EDH data for Wu Longbowman: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 128 real decks.














































