Cruel Alliance
Played in 124 Golgari decks
430+18+1+5+6+10+4+6+
Color Identity Spread
7.3% Golgari
Commanders
Killmonger, Scourge of Wakanda 13.8% of decks
Killmonger, Scourge of Wakanda 13.8% of decks
The Serpent Society 1.0% of decks
The Serpent Society 1.0% of decks
Atlas, Sizable Stooge 17.6% of decks
Atlas, Sizable Stooge 17.6% of decks
Titania, Rugged Rumbler 15.8% of decks
Titania, Rugged Rumbler 15.8% of decks
Most Relevant
Undercover Skrull 33.9% of decks
Undercover Skrull 33.9% of decks
Restorative Technique 37.1% of decks
Restorative Technique 37.1% of decks
Call Damage Control 35.5% of decks
Call Damage Control 35.5% of decks
Serpent Specialist 37.1% of decks
Serpent Specialist 37.1% of decks
Powerful Broker 21.8% of decks
Powerful Broker 21.8% of decks
Rapid Rescue 21.8% of decks
Rapid Rescue 21.8% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (4)
- Killmonger, Scourge of Wakanda relevance 2.42 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- The Serpent Society relevance 2.33 · 1.0% (43 of 4,241 decks)
- Atlas, Sizable Stooge relevance 1.59 · 17.6% (3 of 17 decks)
- Titania, Rugged Rumbler relevance 1.56 · 15.8% (3 of 19 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Undercover Skrull relevance 2.18 · 33.9% (42 of 124 decks)
- Restorative Technique relevance 2.08 · 37.1% (46 of 124 decks)
- Call Damage Control relevance 2.05 · 35.5% (44 of 124 decks)
- Serpent Specialist relevance 2.03 · 37.1% (46 of 124 decks)
- Powerful Broker relevance 1.48 · 21.8% (27 of 124 decks)
- Rapid Rescue relevance 1.43 · 21.8% (27 of 124 decks)
- Killmonger, Scourge of Wakanda relevance 1.33 · 21.0% (26 of 124 decks)
- Epic Fight relevance 1.23 · 18.5% (23 of 124 decks)
- Grapple with Death relevance 1.06 · 31.5% (39 of 124 decks)
- Venom, Evil Unleashed relevance 1.01 · 16.9% (21 of 124 decks)
- Training Regimen relevance 0.92 · 16.1% (20 of 124 decks)
- The Coming of Galactus relevance 0.88 · 14.5% (18 of 124 decks)
- Nighthawk Scavenger relevance 0.87 · 18.5% (23 of 124 decks)
- Scorpion, Seething Striker relevance 0.85 · 12.9% (16 of 124 decks)
- Noxious Newt relevance 0.85 · 24.2% (30 of 124 decks)
- Go Nuts! relevance 0.83 · 12.9% (16 of 124 decks)
- Venom's Hunger relevance 0.83 · 12.9% (16 of 124 decks)
- Pull from the Grave relevance 0.82 · 20.2% (25 of 124 decks)
- Fynn, the Fangbearer relevance 0.80 · 26.6% (33 of 124 decks)
- Burrog Banemaker relevance 0.79 · 15.3% (19 of 124 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.78 · 16.9% (21 of 124 decks)
- Claim the Kingdom relevance 0.77 · 12.9% (16 of 124 decks)
- Gutless Plunderer relevance 0.77 · 11.3% (14 of 124 decks)
- Hapatra, Vizier of Poisons relevance 0.76 · 20.2% (25 of 124 decks)
- Frog Butler relevance 0.73 · 17.7% (22 of 124 decks)
- Wander Off relevance 0.71 · 14.5% (18 of 124 decks)
- Vampire Nighthawk relevance 0.71 · 16.9% (21 of 124 decks)
- Alien Symbiosis relevance 0.70 · 11.3% (14 of 124 decks)
- Venom Connoisseur relevance 0.69 · 10.5% (13 of 124 decks)
- Gwenom, Remorseless relevance 0.67 · 17.7% (22 of 124 decks)
All creatures (18)
- Undercover Skrull relevance 2.18 · 33.9% (42 of 124 decks)
- Serpent Specialist relevance 2.03 · 37.1% (46 of 124 decks)
- Powerful Broker relevance 1.48 · 21.8% (27 of 124 decks)
- Killmonger, Scourge of Wakanda relevance 1.33 · 21.0% (26 of 124 decks)
- Venom, Evil Unleashed relevance 1.01 · 16.9% (21 of 124 decks)
- Nighthawk Scavenger relevance 0.87 · 18.5% (23 of 124 decks)
- Scorpion, Seething Striker relevance 0.85 · 12.9% (16 of 124 decks)
- Noxious Newt relevance 0.85 · 24.2% (30 of 124 decks)
- Fynn, the Fangbearer relevance 0.80 · 26.6% (33 of 124 decks)
- Burrog Banemaker relevance 0.79 · 15.3% (19 of 124 decks)
- Gutless Plunderer relevance 0.77 · 11.3% (14 of 124 decks)
- Hapatra, Vizier of Poisons relevance 0.76 · 20.2% (25 of 124 decks)
- Frog Butler relevance 0.73 · 17.7% (22 of 124 decks)
- Vampire Nighthawk relevance 0.71 · 16.9% (21 of 124 decks)
- Venom Connoisseur relevance 0.69 · 10.5% (13 of 124 decks)
- Gwenom, Remorseless relevance 0.67 · 17.7% (22 of 124 decks)
- Glissa Sunslayer relevance 0.62 · 26.6% (33 of 124 decks)
- Ant-Man's Army relevance 0.59 · 8.9% (11 of 124 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.59 · 18.5% (23 of 124 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Training Regimen relevance 0.92 · 16.1% (20 of 124 decks)
- The Coming of Galactus relevance 0.88 · 14.5% (18 of 124 decks)
- Claim the Kingdom relevance 0.77 · 12.9% (16 of 124 decks)
- Alien Symbiosis relevance 0.70 · 11.3% (14 of 124 decks)
- Vampiric Rites relevance 0.60 · 18.5% (23 of 124 decks)
All instants (6)
- Rapid Rescue relevance 1.43 · 21.8% (27 of 124 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.78 · 16.9% (21 of 124 decks)
- Wander Off relevance 0.71 · 14.5% (18 of 124 decks)
- Glorious Decay relevance 0.67 · 13.7% (17 of 124 decks)
- Witherbloom Charm relevance 0.62 · 28.2% (35 of 124 decks)
- Hero's Downfall relevance 0.60 · 13.7% (17 of 124 decks)
All sorceries (10)
- Restorative Technique relevance 2.08 · 37.1% (46 of 124 decks)
- Call Damage Control relevance 2.05 · 35.5% (44 of 124 decks)
- Epic Fight relevance 1.23 · 18.5% (23 of 124 decks)
- Grapple with Death relevance 1.06 · 31.5% (39 of 124 decks)
- Go Nuts! relevance 0.83 · 12.9% (16 of 124 decks)
- Venom's Hunger relevance 0.83 · 12.9% (16 of 124 decks)
- Pull from the Grave relevance 0.82 · 20.2% (25 of 124 decks)
- Oracle's Restoration relevance 0.66 · 14.5% (18 of 124 decks)
- Send in the Pest relevance 0.59 · 16.1% (20 of 124 decks)
- Cost of Brilliance relevance 0.59 · 11.3% (14 of 124 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Titan's Grave relevance 1.20 · 44.4% (55 of 124 decks)
- Surveillance Room relevance 0.72 · 11.3% (14 of 124 decks)
- Foggy Bottom Swamp relevance 0.72 · 18.5% (23 of 124 decks)
- Mirkwood relevance 0.58 · 12.1% (15 of 124 decks)
All lands (6)
- Subterranean Cavern relevance 2.16 · 46.8% (58 of 124 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 1.03 · 28.2% (35 of 124 decks)
- Thriving Moor relevance 0.94 · 25.0% (31 of 124 decks)
- Jungle Hollow relevance 0.72 · 45.2% (56 of 124 decks)
- Illegitimate Business relevance 0.71 · 19.4% (24 of 124 decks)
- Golgari Guildgate relevance 0.59 · 21.0% (26 of 124 decks)
EDH data for Cruel Alliance: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 124 real decks.











































