Library of Lat-Nam
Played in 50 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
430+17+8+3+9+5+5+3+
That's every commander.
All commanders (4)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 1.28 · 3.0% (3 of 101 decks)
- Eligeth, Crossroads Augur // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 1.01 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Eligeth, Crossroads Augur // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.64 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Kianne, Dean of Substance // Imbraham, Dean of Theory relevance 0.54 · 1.4% (1 of 73 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Mitotic Slime relevance 1.85 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
- Heraldic Banner relevance 1.74 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
- Admiral's Order relevance 1.73 · 26.0% (13 of 50 decks)
- Confound relevance 1.70 · 26.0% (13 of 50 decks)
- Darksteel Ingot relevance 1.66 · 28.0% (14 of 50 decks)
- Gelatinous Genesis relevance 1.61 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
- Artistic Refusal relevance 1.60 · 26.0% (13 of 50 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 1.47 · 28.0% (14 of 50 decks)
- Personal Tutor relevance 1.37 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
- Ochre Jelly relevance 1.29 · 28.0% (14 of 50 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 1.28 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
- Biowaste Blob relevance 1.28 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
- Anticognition relevance 1.26 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- Awakening Zone relevance 1.24 · 28.0% (14 of 50 decks)
- Emil, Vastlands Roamer relevance 1.09 · 28.0% (14 of 50 decks)
- Archivist relevance 1.08 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Squirrel Nest relevance 1.05 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 1.02 · 24.0% (12 of 50 decks)
- Crashing Drawbridge relevance 0.99 · 24.0% (12 of 50 decks)
- Aggressive Biomancy relevance 0.99 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
- Archmage Ascension relevance 0.97 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Hedron Archive relevance 0.88 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Citanul Hierophants relevance 0.86 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.84 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
- Long-Term Plans relevance 0.80 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Decisive Denial relevance 0.76 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.76 · 32.0% (16 of 50 decks)
- Helm of the Host relevance 0.73 · 22.0% (11 of 50 decks)
- For the Common Good relevance 0.68 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.67 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
All creatures (17)
- Mitotic Slime relevance 1.85 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 1.47 · 28.0% (14 of 50 decks)
- Ochre Jelly relevance 1.29 · 28.0% (14 of 50 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 1.28 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
- Biowaste Blob relevance 1.28 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
- Emil, Vastlands Roamer relevance 1.09 · 28.0% (14 of 50 decks)
- Archivist relevance 1.08 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Crashing Drawbridge relevance 0.99 · 24.0% (12 of 50 decks)
- Citanul Hierophants relevance 0.86 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.67 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.67 · 32.0% (16 of 50 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.56 · 26.0% (13 of 50 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.49 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.49 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.46 · 24.0% (12 of 50 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.42 · 22.0% (11 of 50 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.41 · 32.0% (16 of 50 decks)
All artifacts (8)
- Heraldic Banner relevance 1.74 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
- Darksteel Ingot relevance 1.66 · 28.0% (14 of 50 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 1.02 · 24.0% (12 of 50 decks)
- Hedron Archive relevance 0.88 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.76 · 32.0% (16 of 50 decks)
- Helm of the Host relevance 0.73 · 22.0% (11 of 50 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.65 · 46.0% (23 of 50 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.54 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Awakening Zone relevance 1.24 · 28.0% (14 of 50 decks)
- Squirrel Nest relevance 1.05 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Archmage Ascension relevance 0.97 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
All instants (9)
- Admiral's Order relevance 1.73 · 26.0% (13 of 50 decks)
- Confound relevance 1.70 · 26.0% (13 of 50 decks)
- Artistic Refusal relevance 1.60 · 26.0% (13 of 50 decks)
- Anticognition relevance 1.26 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- Long-Term Plans relevance 0.80 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Decisive Denial relevance 0.76 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
- Second Harvest relevance 0.58 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.55 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.53 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Gelatinous Genesis relevance 1.61 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
- Personal Tutor relevance 1.37 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
- Aggressive Biomancy relevance 0.99 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.84 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
- For the Common Good relevance 0.68 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
All utility lands (5)
- Arch of Orazca relevance 1.36 · 24.0% (12 of 50 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.95 · 28.0% (14 of 50 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.93 · 22.0% (11 of 50 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.80 · 36.0% (18 of 50 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.49 · 34.0% (17 of 50 decks)
All lands (3)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.52 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.48 · 36.0% (18 of 50 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.42 · 28.0% (14 of 50 decks)
EDH data for Library of Lat-Nam: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 50 real decks.






















































