Serpent-Blade Assailant
Played in 130 Naya decks
Color Identity Spread
8.1% Naya
-
Green 776 · 48.3%
-
Golgari 354 · 22.0%
-
Naya 130 · 8.1%
-
Sultai 86 · 5.4%
-
Simic 81 · 5.0%
-
Selesnya 61 · 3.8%
- Other (12) 119 · 7.4%
130+39+1+5+2+3+
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Bright-Palm, Soul Awakener relevance 2.96 · 3.1% (47 of 1,526 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Mirror-Shield Hoplite relevance 2.51 · 37.7% (49 of 130 decks)
- Boon-Bringer Valkyrie relevance 2.48 · 37.7% (49 of 130 decks)
- Doomskar Warrior relevance 2.28 · 34.6% (45 of 130 decks)
- Death-Greeter's Champion relevance 2.09 · 36.9% (48 of 130 decks)
- Conclave Sledge-Captain relevance 1.80 · 40.0% (52 of 130 decks)
- Emergent Woodwurm relevance 1.77 · 35.4% (46 of 130 decks)
- Mirror-Style Master relevance 1.70 · 31.5% (41 of 130 decks)
- Guardian Scalelord relevance 1.63 · 34.6% (45 of 130 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 1.05 · 44.6% (58 of 130 decks)
- Hamza, Guardian of Arashin relevance 0.94 · 23.8% (31 of 130 decks)
- Shalai and Hallar relevance 0.93 · 32.3% (42 of 130 decks)
- Uncivil Unrest relevance 0.93 · 23.8% (31 of 130 decks)
- Deathbloom Gardener relevance 0.84 · 13.1% (17 of 130 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.83 · 27.7% (36 of 130 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 0.83 · 15.4% (20 of 130 decks)
- Conclave Mentor relevance 0.82 · 23.8% (31 of 130 decks)
- Good-Fortune Unicorn relevance 0.82 · 20.0% (26 of 130 decks)
- Tolsimir, Midnight's Light relevance 0.81 · 20.0% (26 of 130 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.80 · 28.5% (37 of 130 decks)
- Hungry Ridgewolf relevance 0.77 · 11.5% (15 of 130 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.74 · 25.4% (33 of 130 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.74 · 21.5% (28 of 130 decks)
- Armorcraft Judge relevance 0.74 · 18.5% (24 of 130 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.73 · 23.1% (30 of 130 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.72 · 30.0% (39 of 130 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.70 · 20.8% (27 of 130 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.70 · 36.2% (47 of 130 decks)
- Dromoka's Command relevance 0.69 · 16.2% (21 of 130 decks)
- Pollenbright Druid relevance 0.69 · 10.8% (14 of 130 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 0.67 · 17.7% (23 of 130 decks)
All creatures (39)
- Mirror-Shield Hoplite relevance 2.51 · 37.7% (49 of 130 decks)
- Boon-Bringer Valkyrie relevance 2.48 · 37.7% (49 of 130 decks)
- Doomskar Warrior relevance 2.28 · 34.6% (45 of 130 decks)
- Death-Greeter's Champion relevance 2.09 · 36.9% (48 of 130 decks)
- Conclave Sledge-Captain relevance 1.80 · 40.0% (52 of 130 decks)
- Emergent Woodwurm relevance 1.77 · 35.4% (46 of 130 decks)
- Mirror-Style Master relevance 1.70 · 31.5% (41 of 130 decks)
- Guardian Scalelord relevance 1.63 · 34.6% (45 of 130 decks)
- Hamza, Guardian of Arashin relevance 0.94 · 23.8% (31 of 130 decks)
- Shalai and Hallar relevance 0.93 · 32.3% (42 of 130 decks)
- Deathbloom Gardener relevance 0.84 · 13.1% (17 of 130 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.83 · 27.7% (36 of 130 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 0.83 · 15.4% (20 of 130 decks)
- Conclave Mentor relevance 0.82 · 23.8% (31 of 130 decks)
- Good-Fortune Unicorn relevance 0.82 · 20.0% (26 of 130 decks)
- Tolsimir, Midnight's Light relevance 0.81 · 20.0% (26 of 130 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.80 · 28.5% (37 of 130 decks)
- Hungry Ridgewolf relevance 0.77 · 11.5% (15 of 130 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.74 · 25.4% (33 of 130 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.74 · 21.5% (28 of 130 decks)
- Armorcraft Judge relevance 0.74 · 18.5% (24 of 130 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.73 · 23.1% (30 of 130 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.70 · 20.8% (27 of 130 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.70 · 36.2% (47 of 130 decks)
- Pollenbright Druid relevance 0.69 · 10.8% (14 of 130 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 0.67 · 17.7% (23 of 130 decks)
- Tolsimir, Friend to Wolves relevance 0.66 · 16.2% (21 of 130 decks)
- Abzan Falconer relevance 0.64 · 18.5% (24 of 130 decks)
- Virulent Emissary relevance 0.62 · 11.5% (15 of 130 decks)
- Tolsimir Wolfblood relevance 0.62 · 13.8% (18 of 130 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 0.62 · 16.2% (21 of 130 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.62 · 11.5% (15 of 130 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.61 · 16.2% (21 of 130 decks)
- Thornweald Archer relevance 0.60 · 9.2% (12 of 130 decks)
- Ascendant Packleader relevance 0.60 · 11.5% (15 of 130 decks)
- Pridemalkin relevance 0.58 · 15.4% (20 of 130 decks)
- Mikaeus, the Lunarch relevance 0.57 · 14.6% (19 of 130 decks)
- Abzan Battle Priest relevance 0.56 · 12.3% (16 of 130 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.55 · 20.0% (26 of 130 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.63 · 20.0% (26 of 130 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Uncivil Unrest relevance 0.93 · 23.8% (31 of 130 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.72 · 30.0% (39 of 130 decks)
- Together Forever relevance 0.59 · 13.1% (17 of 130 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.55 · 20.0% (26 of 130 decks)
- Invigorating Hot Spring relevance 0.55 · 12.3% (16 of 130 decks)
All instants (2)
- Inspiring Call relevance 1.05 · 44.6% (58 of 130 decks)
- Dromoka's Command relevance 0.69 · 16.2% (21 of 130 decks)
All lands (3)
- Wind-Scarred Crag relevance 0.85 · 26.9% (35 of 130 decks)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.74 · 24.6% (32 of 130 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.71 · 24.6% (32 of 130 decks)
EDH data for Serpent-Blade Assailant: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 130 real decks.
































