Pain Magnification
Played in 145 Jund decks
Color Identity Spread
4.1% Jund
- Rakdos 2,283 · 65.0%
- Grixis 886 · 25.2%
- Jund 145 · 4.1%
- Mardu 111 · 3.2%
- Other (6) 85 · 2.4%
All commanders (3)
- Winter, Misanthropic Guide relevance 1.81 · 1.0% (36 of 3,465 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 1.10 · 1.5% (6 of 402 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.43 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Painful Quandary relevance 1.31 · 31.0% (45 of 145 decks)
- Waste Not relevance 1.00 · 22.8% (33 of 145 decks)
- Cindervines relevance 0.93 · 22.8% (33 of 145 decks)
- Kroxa, Titan of Death's Hunger relevance 0.88 · 17.9% (26 of 145 decks)
- Megrim relevance 0.86 · 18.6% (27 of 145 decks)
- Entropic Battlecruiser relevance 0.86 · 17.2% (25 of 145 decks)
- Spiteful Visions relevance 0.86 · 20.7% (30 of 145 decks)
- Citadel of Pain relevance 0.84 · 23.4% (34 of 145 decks)
- Kaervek the Merciless relevance 0.80 · 21.4% (31 of 145 decks)
- Fell Specter relevance 0.80 · 14.5% (21 of 145 decks)
- Geth's Grimoire relevance 0.77 · 15.2% (22 of 145 decks)
- Bandit's Talent relevance 0.76 · 13.1% (19 of 145 decks)
- Sword of the Paruns relevance 0.75 · 17.9% (26 of 145 decks)
- Underworld Dreams relevance 0.75 · 17.2% (25 of 145 decks)
- Liliana's Caress relevance 0.74 · 15.9% (23 of 145 decks)
- Nath of the Gilt-Leaf relevance 0.73 · 11.7% (17 of 145 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.73 · 19.3% (28 of 145 decks)
- Rankle, Master of Pranks relevance 0.73 · 15.2% (22 of 145 decks)
- Syphon Mind relevance 0.73 · 18.6% (27 of 145 decks)
- Belbe, Corrupted Observer relevance 0.71 · 19.3% (28 of 145 decks)
- Oppression relevance 0.70 · 13.1% (19 of 145 decks)
- Fate Unraveler relevance 0.70 · 15.9% (23 of 145 decks)
- Zurzoth, Chaos Rider relevance 0.69 · 14.5% (21 of 145 decks)
- Stoneshaker Shaman relevance 0.69 · 17.2% (25 of 145 decks)
- Cunning Lethemancer relevance 0.68 · 10.3% (15 of 145 decks)
- Dark Deal relevance 0.67 · 15.2% (22 of 145 decks)
- Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 0.66 · 15.9% (23 of 145 decks)
- Manabarbs relevance 0.65 · 17.9% (26 of 145 decks)
- Bottomless Pit relevance 0.65 · 10.3% (15 of 145 decks)
- War's Toll relevance 0.65 · 17.2% (25 of 145 decks)
All creatures (23)
- Kroxa, Titan of Death's Hunger relevance 0.88 · 17.9% (26 of 145 decks)
- Kaervek the Merciless relevance 0.80 · 21.4% (31 of 145 decks)
- Fell Specter relevance 0.80 · 14.5% (21 of 145 decks)
- Nath of the Gilt-Leaf relevance 0.73 · 11.7% (17 of 145 decks)
- Rankle, Master of Pranks relevance 0.73 · 15.2% (22 of 145 decks)
- Belbe, Corrupted Observer relevance 0.71 · 19.3% (28 of 145 decks)
- Fate Unraveler relevance 0.70 · 15.9% (23 of 145 decks)
- Zurzoth, Chaos Rider relevance 0.69 · 14.5% (21 of 145 decks)
- Stoneshaker Shaman relevance 0.69 · 17.2% (25 of 145 decks)
- Cunning Lethemancer relevance 0.68 · 10.3% (15 of 145 decks)
- Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 0.66 · 15.9% (23 of 145 decks)
- Harsh Mentor relevance 0.64 · 15.2% (22 of 145 decks)
- Scrawling Crawler relevance 0.63 · 15.9% (23 of 145 decks)
- The Lord of Pain relevance 0.62 · 13.8% (20 of 145 decks)
- Sangromancer relevance 0.60 · 11.7% (17 of 145 decks)
- Magus of the Vineyard relevance 0.57 · 15.2% (22 of 145 decks)
- Florian, Voldaren Scion relevance 0.56 · 10.3% (15 of 145 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Ancient relevance 0.56 · 15.2% (22 of 145 decks)
- Razorkin Needlehead relevance 0.55 · 13.1% (19 of 145 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 0.55 · 14.5% (21 of 145 decks)
- Scytheclaw Raptor relevance 0.54 · 13.8% (20 of 145 decks)
- Tinybones, Bauble Burglar relevance 0.52 · 10.3% (15 of 145 decks)
- Aclazotz, Deepest Betrayal // Temple of the Dead relevance 0.52 · 10.3% (15 of 145 decks)
All artifacts (5)
- Entropic Battlecruiser relevance 0.86 · 17.2% (25 of 145 decks)
- Geth's Grimoire relevance 0.77 · 15.2% (22 of 145 decks)
- Sword of the Paruns relevance 0.75 · 17.9% (26 of 145 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.57 · 15.2% (22 of 145 decks)
- Horizon Stone relevance 0.52 · 13.8% (20 of 145 decks)
All enchantments (18)
- Painful Quandary relevance 1.31 · 31.0% (45 of 145 decks)
- Waste Not relevance 1.00 · 22.8% (33 of 145 decks)
- Cindervines relevance 0.93 · 22.8% (33 of 145 decks)
- Megrim relevance 0.86 · 18.6% (27 of 145 decks)
- Spiteful Visions relevance 0.86 · 20.7% (30 of 145 decks)
- Citadel of Pain relevance 0.84 · 23.4% (34 of 145 decks)
- Bandit's Talent relevance 0.76 · 13.1% (19 of 145 decks)
- Underworld Dreams relevance 0.75 · 17.2% (25 of 145 decks)
- Liliana's Caress relevance 0.74 · 15.9% (23 of 145 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.73 · 19.3% (28 of 145 decks)
- Oppression relevance 0.70 · 13.1% (19 of 145 decks)
- Manabarbs relevance 0.65 · 17.9% (26 of 145 decks)
- Bottomless Pit relevance 0.65 · 10.3% (15 of 145 decks)
- War's Toll relevance 0.65 · 17.2% (25 of 145 decks)
- Raiders' Wake relevance 0.61 · 11.0% (16 of 145 decks)
- Mana Flare relevance 0.56 · 15.9% (23 of 145 decks)
- Overabundance relevance 0.55 · 15.2% (22 of 145 decks)
- Power Surge relevance 0.55 · 14.5% (21 of 145 decks)
All instants (2)
- Drag to the Roots relevance 0.56 · 14.5% (21 of 145 decks)
- Chaos Warp relevance 0.52 · 29.0% (42 of 145 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Syphon Mind relevance 0.73 · 18.6% (27 of 145 decks)
- Dark Deal relevance 0.67 · 15.2% (22 of 145 decks)
EDH data for Pain Magnification: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 145 real decks.