Curse of the Werefox
Played in 145 Golgari decks
Color Identity Spread
9.9% Golgari
530+17+2+5+11+11+2+2+
That's every commander.
All commanders (5)
- Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Agent of the Iron Throne relevance 0.94 · 4.4% (2 of 45 decks)
- Raised by Giants // Sarevok, Deathbringer relevance 0.90 · 1.5% (3 of 206 decks)
- Falthis, Shadowcat Familiar // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.67 · 1.2% (2 of 172 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Agent of the Shadow Thieves relevance 0.48 · 1.9% (1 of 54 decks)
- Gargantos, the Endbringer relevance 0.44 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Ent's Fury relevance 1.15 · 17.9% (26 of 145 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 1.12 · 31.7% (46 of 145 decks)
- Cartouche of Strength relevance 0.93 · 13.8% (20 of 145 decks)
- Prey Upon relevance 0.91 · 17.2% (25 of 145 decks)
- Ancient Animus relevance 0.88 · 17.2% (25 of 145 decks)
- Hunter's Talent relevance 0.85 · 19.3% (28 of 145 decks)
- Prizefight relevance 0.84 · 18.6% (27 of 145 decks)
- Night of the Sweets' Revenge relevance 0.75 · 25.5% (37 of 145 decks)
- Boxing Ring relevance 0.73 · 11.7% (17 of 145 decks)
- Inscription of Abundance relevance 0.73 · 17.2% (25 of 145 decks)
- Longstalk Brawl relevance 0.71 · 11.7% (17 of 145 decks)
- Tail Swipe relevance 0.69 · 13.1% (19 of 145 decks)
- Heaped Harvest relevance 0.69 · 20.0% (29 of 145 decks)
- Meltstrider's Resolve relevance 0.68 · 12.4% (18 of 145 decks)
- Ulvenwald Tracker relevance 0.67 · 15.2% (22 of 145 decks)
- Spider Food relevance 0.66 · 15.9% (23 of 145 decks)
- Shelob, Dread Weaver relevance 0.66 · 16.6% (24 of 145 decks)
- Back for More relevance 0.65 · 13.1% (19 of 145 decks)
- Clash of the Eikons relevance 0.64 · 9.7% (14 of 145 decks)
- Chainweb Aracnir relevance 0.64 · 15.2% (22 of 145 decks)
- Cosmic Hunger relevance 0.60 · 13.8% (20 of 145 decks)
- Return from the Wilds relevance 0.59 · 13.1% (19 of 145 decks)
- Horrific Assault relevance 0.57 · 9.7% (14 of 145 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.57 · 14.5% (21 of 145 decks)
- Twin-Silk Spider relevance 0.56 · 13.8% (20 of 145 decks)
- Nature's Way relevance 0.55 · 9.7% (14 of 145 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.55 · 10.3% (15 of 145 decks)
- Spider-Man, Brooklyn Visionary relevance 0.52 · 9.7% (14 of 145 decks)
- Mirkwood Spider relevance 0.52 · 12.4% (18 of 145 decks)
- Royal Treatment relevance 0.52 · 13.1% (19 of 145 decks)
All creatures (17)
- Ulvenwald Tracker relevance 0.67 · 15.2% (22 of 145 decks)
- Shelob, Dread Weaver relevance 0.66 · 16.6% (24 of 145 decks)
- Chainweb Aracnir relevance 0.64 · 15.2% (22 of 145 decks)
- Twin-Silk Spider relevance 0.56 · 13.8% (20 of 145 decks)
- Spider-Man, Brooklyn Visionary relevance 0.52 · 9.7% (14 of 145 decks)
- Mirkwood Spider relevance 0.52 · 12.4% (18 of 145 decks)
- Radioactive Spider relevance 0.51 · 11.0% (16 of 145 decks)
- Sentinel Spider relevance 0.50 · 8.3% (12 of 145 decks)
- Fynn, the Fangbearer relevance 0.48 · 15.9% (23 of 145 decks)
- Watcher in the Web relevance 0.48 · 11.0% (16 of 145 decks)
- Rotwidow Pack relevance 0.47 · 11.7% (17 of 145 decks)
- Silklash Spider relevance 0.47 · 11.0% (16 of 145 decks)
- Deadly Recluse relevance 0.47 · 11.7% (17 of 145 decks)
- Brood Weaver relevance 0.47 · 10.3% (15 of 145 decks)
- Spinner of Souls relevance 0.46 · 12.4% (18 of 145 decks)
- Netcaster Spider relevance 0.45 · 7.6% (11 of 145 decks)
- Drider relevance 0.45 · 11.0% (16 of 145 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Boxing Ring relevance 0.73 · 11.7% (17 of 145 decks)
- Heaped Harvest relevance 0.69 · 20.0% (29 of 145 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Cartouche of Strength relevance 0.93 · 13.8% (20 of 145 decks)
- Hunter's Talent relevance 0.85 · 19.3% (28 of 145 decks)
- Night of the Sweets' Revenge relevance 0.75 · 25.5% (37 of 145 decks)
- Meltstrider's Resolve relevance 0.68 · 12.4% (18 of 145 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.55 · 10.3% (15 of 145 decks)
All instants (11)
- Ancient Animus relevance 0.88 · 17.2% (25 of 145 decks)
- Prizefight relevance 0.84 · 18.6% (27 of 145 decks)
- Inscription of Abundance relevance 0.73 · 17.2% (25 of 145 decks)
- Tail Swipe relevance 0.69 · 13.1% (19 of 145 decks)
- Back for More relevance 0.65 · 13.1% (19 of 145 decks)
- Cosmic Hunger relevance 0.60 · 13.8% (20 of 145 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.57 · 14.5% (21 of 145 decks)
- Royal Treatment relevance 0.52 · 13.1% (19 of 145 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.50 · 13.1% (19 of 145 decks)
- Titanic Brawl relevance 0.47 · 8.3% (12 of 145 decks)
- Stew the Coneys relevance 0.46 · 9.7% (14 of 145 decks)
All sorceries (11)
- Ent's Fury relevance 1.15 · 17.9% (26 of 145 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 1.12 · 31.7% (46 of 145 decks)
- Prey Upon relevance 0.91 · 17.2% (25 of 145 decks)
- Longstalk Brawl relevance 0.71 · 11.7% (17 of 145 decks)
- Spider Food relevance 0.66 · 15.9% (23 of 145 decks)
- Clash of the Eikons relevance 0.64 · 9.7% (14 of 145 decks)
- Return from the Wilds relevance 0.59 · 13.1% (19 of 145 decks)
- Horrific Assault relevance 0.57 · 9.7% (14 of 145 decks)
- Nature's Way relevance 0.55 · 9.7% (14 of 145 decks)
- Feral Encounter relevance 0.47 · 6.9% (10 of 145 decks)
- Rabid Bite relevance 0.45 · 8.3% (12 of 145 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.80 · 20.0% (29 of 145 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.70 · 22.1% (32 of 145 decks)
All lands (2)
- Jungle Hollow relevance 0.59 · 37.2% (54 of 145 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.47 · 30.3% (44 of 145 decks)
EDH data for Curse of the Werefox: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 145 real decks.



























































