130+36+3+4+5+2+
Color Identity Spread
14.7% Azorius
Commanders
Most Relevant
Lu Xun, Scholar General 65.6% of decks
Lu Xun, Scholar General 65.6% of decks
Lord Jyscal Guado 65.6% of decks
Lord Jyscal Guado 65.6% of decks
Madame Web, Clairvoyant 62.5% of decks
Madame Web, Clairvoyant 62.5% of decks
Lightshell Duo 62.5% of decks
Lightshell Duo 62.5% of decks
Library Larcenist 62.5% of decks
Library Larcenist 62.5% of decks
Logic Knot 65.6% of decks
Logic Knot 65.6% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Yoshimaru, Ever Faithful relevance 0.63 · 2.2% (1 of 46 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 4.46 · 65.6% (21 of 32 decks)
- Lord Jyscal Guado relevance 4.37 · 65.6% (21 of 32 decks)
- Madame Web, Clairvoyant relevance 4.31 · 62.5% (20 of 32 decks)
- Lightshell Duo relevance 4.26 · 62.5% (20 of 32 decks)
- Library Larcenist relevance 4.20 · 62.5% (20 of 32 decks)
- Logic Knot relevance 4.20 · 65.6% (21 of 32 decks)
- Lockjaw, Slobbering Teleporter relevance 4.17 · 62.5% (20 of 32 decks)
- Living Conundrum relevance 4.15 · 62.5% (20 of 32 decks)
- Loran, Disciple of History relevance 4.07 · 65.6% (21 of 32 decks)
- Lunar Force relevance 4.04 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Library of Lat-Nam relevance 4.03 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator relevance 4.03 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Lost Days relevance 4.02 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Lone Missionary relevance 3.97 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Master Pakku relevance 3.95 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Lulu, Loyal Hollyphant relevance 3.92 · 62.5% (20 of 32 decks)
- Loki, Lord of Misrule relevance 3.92 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Long River Lurker relevance 3.92 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Marauding Sphinx relevance 3.90 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Leader, Super-Genius relevance 3.85 · 56.3% (18 of 32 decks)
- Lightshield Parry relevance 3.80 · 56.3% (18 of 32 decks)
- Lighthouse Chronologist relevance 3.78 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Lone Rider // It That Rides as One relevance 3.78 · 56.3% (18 of 32 decks)
- Leonardo, Big Brother relevance 3.77 · 56.3% (18 of 32 decks)
- Master Piandao relevance 3.75 · 56.3% (18 of 32 decks)
- Magus of the Future relevance 3.71 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Lord of Change relevance 3.71 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Leyline of Singularity relevance 3.71 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Leonardo da Vinci relevance 3.69 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Lost Auramancers relevance 3.69 · 68.8% (22 of 32 decks)
All creatures (36)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 4.46 · 65.6% (21 of 32 decks)
- Lord Jyscal Guado relevance 4.37 · 65.6% (21 of 32 decks)
- Madame Web, Clairvoyant relevance 4.31 · 62.5% (20 of 32 decks)
- Lightshell Duo relevance 4.26 · 62.5% (20 of 32 decks)
- Library Larcenist relevance 4.20 · 62.5% (20 of 32 decks)
- Lockjaw, Slobbering Teleporter relevance 4.17 · 62.5% (20 of 32 decks)
- Living Conundrum relevance 4.15 · 62.5% (20 of 32 decks)
- Loran, Disciple of History relevance 4.07 · 65.6% (21 of 32 decks)
- Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator relevance 4.03 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Lone Missionary relevance 3.97 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Master Pakku relevance 3.95 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Lulu, Loyal Hollyphant relevance 3.92 · 62.5% (20 of 32 decks)
- Loki, Lord of Misrule relevance 3.92 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Long River Lurker relevance 3.92 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Marauding Sphinx relevance 3.90 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Leader, Super-Genius relevance 3.85 · 56.3% (18 of 32 decks)
- Lighthouse Chronologist relevance 3.78 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Lone Rider // It That Rides as One relevance 3.78 · 56.3% (18 of 32 decks)
- Leonardo, Big Brother relevance 3.77 · 56.3% (18 of 32 decks)
- Master Piandao relevance 3.75 · 56.3% (18 of 32 decks)
- Magus of the Future relevance 3.71 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Lord of Change relevance 3.71 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Leonardo da Vinci relevance 3.69 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Lost Auramancers relevance 3.69 · 68.8% (22 of 32 decks)
- Master of Predicaments relevance 3.66 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Lena, Selfless Champion relevance 3.65 · 56.3% (18 of 32 decks)
- Lionheart Glimmer relevance 3.65 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Jushi Apprentice // Tomoya the Revealer relevance 3.65 · 53.1% (17 of 32 decks)
- Beetle, Legacy Criminal relevance 3.65 · 53.1% (17 of 32 decks)
- Aetherplasm relevance 3.64 · 53.1% (17 of 32 decks)
- Masako the Humorless relevance 3.61 · 56.3% (18 of 32 decks)
- Mirror-Mad Phantasm relevance 3.61 · 56.3% (18 of 32 decks)
- Meloku the Clouded Mirror relevance 3.60 · 62.5% (20 of 32 decks)
- Landroval, Horizon Witness relevance 3.59 · 56.3% (18 of 32 decks)
- Kaho, Minamo Historian relevance 3.57 · 53.1% (17 of 32 decks)
- MJ, Rising Star relevance 3.57 · 53.1% (17 of 32 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Lunatic Pandora relevance 3.66 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Lodestone Needle // Guidestone Compass relevance 3.59 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Lion Heart relevance 3.59 · 53.1% (17 of 32 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Lunar Force relevance 4.04 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Leyline of Singularity relevance 3.71 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Mana Maze relevance 3.64 · 53.1% (17 of 32 decks)
- Medomai's Prophecy relevance 3.64 · 53.1% (17 of 32 decks)
All instants (5)
- Logic Knot relevance 4.20 · 65.6% (21 of 32 decks)
- Lost Days relevance 4.02 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Lightshield Parry relevance 3.80 · 56.3% (18 of 32 decks)
- Mind Games relevance 3.63 · 53.1% (17 of 32 decks)
- Lost to Legend relevance 3.62 · 56.3% (18 of 32 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Library of Lat-Nam relevance 4.03 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Mass Diminish relevance 3.64 · 53.1% (17 of 32 decks)
EDH data for Linessa, Zephyr Mage: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 32 real decks.































