Paleoloth
Played in 224 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
5.1% Simic
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (5)
- Radagast, Wizard of Wilds relevance 4.40 · 20.4% (79 of 388 decks)
- Tawnos, the Toymaker relevance 3.22 · 6.8% (55 of 809 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 1.01 · 1.9% (5 of 268 decks)
- Skanos Dragonheart // Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.81 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.45 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Krosan Warchief relevance 2.76 · 49.1% (110 of 224 decks)
- Wirewood Savage relevance 2.56 · 44.2% (99 of 224 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 2.54 · 61.2% (137 of 224 decks)
- Spearbreaker Behemoth relevance 2.39 · 38.4% (86 of 224 decks)
- Thragtusk relevance 2.26 · 41.1% (92 of 224 decks)
- Siege Behemoth relevance 2.21 · 35.7% (80 of 224 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 2.14 · 48.2% (108 of 224 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 1.94 · 55.8% (125 of 224 decks)
- Tawnos, the Toymaker relevance 1.83 · 29.5% (66 of 224 decks)
- Phyrexian Ingester relevance 1.62 · 26.8% (60 of 224 decks)
- Trygon Predator relevance 1.54 · 49.6% (111 of 224 decks)
- Ulvenwald Oddity // Ulvenwald Behemoth relevance 1.46 · 28.1% (63 of 224 decks)
- Curiosity Crafter relevance 1.40 · 40.6% (91 of 224 decks)
- Caller of the Pack relevance 1.39 · 22.8% (51 of 224 decks)
- Manglehorn relevance 1.39 · 32.1% (72 of 224 decks)
- Garruk's Horde relevance 1.38 · 21.9% (49 of 224 decks)
- Owlbear Cub relevance 1.36 · 22.8% (51 of 224 decks)
- Owlbear relevance 1.29 · 21.0% (47 of 224 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.28 · 61.2% (137 of 224 decks)
- Blossoming Bogbeast relevance 1.28 · 21.0% (47 of 224 decks)
- Somberwald Beastmaster relevance 1.21 · 19.2% (43 of 224 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 1.20 · 31.3% (70 of 224 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 1.17 · 29.5% (66 of 224 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 1.12 · 31.3% (70 of 224 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 1.11 · 61.2% (137 of 224 decks)
- Woodland Liege relevance 1.10 · 17.0% (38 of 224 decks)
- Frenzied Baloth relevance 1.05 · 23.2% (52 of 224 decks)
- Combine Chrysalis relevance 1.02 · 30.4% (68 of 224 decks)
- Gandalf, Westward Voyager relevance 0.99 · 21.9% (49 of 224 decks)
- Arboreal Grazer relevance 0.98 · 25.9% (58 of 224 decks)
All creatures (38)
- Krosan Warchief relevance 2.76 · 49.1% (110 of 224 decks)
- Wirewood Savage relevance 2.56 · 44.2% (99 of 224 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 2.54 · 61.2% (137 of 224 decks)
- Spearbreaker Behemoth relevance 2.39 · 38.4% (86 of 224 decks)
- Thragtusk relevance 2.26 · 41.1% (92 of 224 decks)
- Siege Behemoth relevance 2.21 · 35.7% (80 of 224 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 2.14 · 48.2% (108 of 224 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 1.94 · 55.8% (125 of 224 decks)
- Tawnos, the Toymaker relevance 1.83 · 29.5% (66 of 224 decks)
- Phyrexian Ingester relevance 1.62 · 26.8% (60 of 224 decks)
- Trygon Predator relevance 1.54 · 49.6% (111 of 224 decks)
- Ulvenwald Oddity // Ulvenwald Behemoth relevance 1.46 · 28.1% (63 of 224 decks)
- Curiosity Crafter relevance 1.40 · 40.6% (91 of 224 decks)
- Caller of the Pack relevance 1.39 · 22.8% (51 of 224 decks)
- Manglehorn relevance 1.39 · 32.1% (72 of 224 decks)
- Garruk's Horde relevance 1.38 · 21.9% (49 of 224 decks)
- Owlbear Cub relevance 1.36 · 22.8% (51 of 224 decks)
- Owlbear relevance 1.29 · 21.0% (47 of 224 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.28 · 61.2% (137 of 224 decks)
- Blossoming Bogbeast relevance 1.28 · 21.0% (47 of 224 decks)
- Somberwald Beastmaster relevance 1.21 · 19.2% (43 of 224 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 1.20 · 31.3% (70 of 224 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 1.12 · 31.3% (70 of 224 decks)
- Woodland Liege relevance 1.10 · 17.0% (38 of 224 decks)
- Frenzied Baloth relevance 1.05 · 23.2% (52 of 224 decks)
- Gandalf, Westward Voyager relevance 0.99 · 21.9% (49 of 224 decks)
- Arboreal Grazer relevance 0.98 · 25.9% (58 of 224 decks)
- Woodland Bellower relevance 0.87 · 18.3% (41 of 224 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.86 · 32.1% (72 of 224 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 0.85 · 15.2% (34 of 224 decks)
- Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 0.82 · 36.2% (81 of 224 decks)
- Hydroid Krasis relevance 0.81 · 40.6% (91 of 224 decks)
- Nylea's Forerunner relevance 0.79 · 12.9% (29 of 224 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.74 · 22.3% (50 of 224 decks)
- Thunderous Snapper relevance 0.73 · 15.6% (35 of 224 decks)
- Inga and Esika relevance 0.70 · 17.0% (38 of 224 decks)
- Gemrazer relevance 0.69 · 15.6% (35 of 224 decks)
- Protean Hulk relevance 0.67 · 12.5% (28 of 224 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Combine Chrysalis relevance 1.02 · 30.4% (68 of 224 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 1.17 · 29.5% (66 of 224 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 1.11 · 61.2% (137 of 224 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.92 · 27.7% (62 of 224 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.85 · 28.1% (63 of 224 decks)
- Song of Eärendil relevance 0.68 · 16.5% (37 of 224 decks)
All instants (2)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.76 · 31.3% (70 of 224 decks)
- Second Harvest relevance 0.74 · 25.4% (57 of 224 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.91 · 32.6% (73 of 224 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.80 · 24.6% (55 of 224 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.66 · 27.2% (61 of 224 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.89 · 21.0% (47 of 224 decks)
EDH data for Paleoloth: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 224 real decks.