Consign to Dream
Played in 58 Azorius decks
Color Identity Spread
16.5% Azorius
All commanders (1)
- The First Doctor relevance 0.70 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Contradict relevance 3.55 · 53.4% (31 of 58 decks)
- Counterlash relevance 3.41 · 50.0% (29 of 58 decks)
- Compelling Argument relevance 3.41 · 50.0% (29 of 58 decks)
- Cryptoplasm relevance 3.32 · 48.3% (28 of 58 decks)
- Cosi's Trickster relevance 3.30 · 50.0% (29 of 58 decks)
- Complicate relevance 3.28 · 50.0% (29 of 58 decks)
- Cosmic Epiphany relevance 3.27 · 48.3% (28 of 58 decks)
- Curfew relevance 3.27 · 50.0% (29 of 58 decks)
- Case the Joint relevance 3.25 · 48.3% (28 of 58 decks)
- Countermand relevance 3.25 · 50.0% (29 of 58 decks)
- Covert Technician relevance 3.22 · 48.3% (28 of 58 decks)
- Constrictor Sage relevance 3.20 · 48.3% (28 of 58 decks)
- Collector's Case relevance 3.19 · 46.6% (27 of 58 decks)
- Daring Sleuth // Bearer of Overwhelming Truths relevance 3.19 · 46.6% (27 of 58 decks)
- Deny Existence relevance 3.17 · 46.6% (27 of 58 decks)
- Conundrum Sphinx relevance 3.17 · 46.6% (27 of 58 decks)
- Counsel of the Soratami relevance 3.17 · 48.3% (28 of 58 decks)
- Crafty Cutpurse relevance 3.17 · 50.0% (29 of 58 decks)
- Cultural Exchange relevance 3.16 · 48.3% (28 of 58 decks)
- Aberrant Researcher // Perfected Form relevance 3.14 · 46.6% (27 of 58 decks)
- Crypsis relevance 3.14 · 48.3% (28 of 58 decks)
- Curse of Echoes relevance 3.13 · 46.6% (27 of 58 decks)
- Cold Case Cracker relevance 3.09 · 46.6% (27 of 58 decks)
- Coveted Peacock relevance 3.08 · 48.3% (28 of 58 decks)
- Court Hussar relevance 3.07 · 46.6% (27 of 58 decks)
- Court Homunculus relevance 3.07 · 44.8% (26 of 58 decks)
- Clash of Wills relevance 3.06 · 48.3% (28 of 58 decks)
- Crab Umbra relevance 3.06 · 48.3% (28 of 58 decks)
- Cursecatcher relevance 3.05 · 51.7% (30 of 58 decks)
- Conspiracy Unraveler relevance 3.04 · 46.6% (27 of 58 decks)
All creatures (18)
- Cryptoplasm relevance 3.32 · 48.3% (28 of 58 decks)
- Cosi's Trickster relevance 3.30 · 50.0% (29 of 58 decks)
- Covert Technician relevance 3.22 · 48.3% (28 of 58 decks)
- Constrictor Sage relevance 3.20 · 48.3% (28 of 58 decks)
- Daring Sleuth // Bearer of Overwhelming Truths relevance 3.19 · 46.6% (27 of 58 decks)
- Conundrum Sphinx relevance 3.17 · 46.6% (27 of 58 decks)
- Crafty Cutpurse relevance 3.17 · 50.0% (29 of 58 decks)
- Aberrant Researcher // Perfected Form relevance 3.14 · 46.6% (27 of 58 decks)
- Cold Case Cracker relevance 3.09 · 46.6% (27 of 58 decks)
- Coveted Peacock relevance 3.08 · 48.3% (28 of 58 decks)
- Court Hussar relevance 3.07 · 46.6% (27 of 58 decks)
- Court Homunculus relevance 3.07 · 44.8% (26 of 58 decks)
- Cursecatcher relevance 3.05 · 51.7% (30 of 58 decks)
- Conspiracy Unraveler relevance 3.04 · 46.6% (27 of 58 decks)
- Corsair Captain relevance 2.99 · 46.6% (27 of 58 decks)
- Coralhelm Commander relevance 2.99 · 51.7% (30 of 58 decks)
- Cyclone Summoner relevance 2.98 · 44.8% (26 of 58 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 2.97 · 43.1% (25 of 58 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Collector's Case relevance 3.19 · 46.6% (27 of 58 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Curse of Echoes relevance 3.13 · 46.6% (27 of 58 decks)
- Crab Umbra relevance 3.06 · 48.3% (28 of 58 decks)
- Compulsion relevance 3.04 · 48.3% (28 of 58 decks)
- Cradle of Safety relevance 2.98 · 46.6% (27 of 58 decks)
All instants (20)
- Contradict relevance 3.55 · 53.4% (31 of 58 decks)
- Counterlash relevance 3.41 · 50.0% (29 of 58 decks)
- Complicate relevance 3.28 · 50.0% (29 of 58 decks)
- Curfew relevance 3.27 · 50.0% (29 of 58 decks)
- Case the Joint relevance 3.25 · 48.3% (28 of 58 decks)
- Countermand relevance 3.25 · 50.0% (29 of 58 decks)
- Deny Existence relevance 3.17 · 46.6% (27 of 58 decks)
- Crypsis relevance 3.14 · 48.3% (28 of 58 decks)
- Clash of Wills relevance 3.06 · 48.3% (28 of 58 decks)
- Commence the Endgame relevance 3.04 · 46.6% (27 of 58 decks)
- Call to Heel relevance 3.03 · 44.8% (26 of 58 decks)
- Aether Gust relevance 3.03 · 44.8% (26 of 58 decks)
- Dire Downdraft relevance 3.02 · 44.8% (26 of 58 decks)
- Complete the Circuit relevance 3.01 · 48.3% (28 of 58 decks)
- Crippling Chill relevance 3.01 · 50.0% (29 of 58 decks)
- Commander's Insight relevance 3.01 · 50.0% (29 of 58 decks)
- Countervailing Winds relevance 3.01 · 50.0% (29 of 58 decks)
- Catalog relevance 2.99 · 44.8% (26 of 58 decks)
- Dispersal Shield relevance 2.97 · 43.1% (25 of 58 decks)
- Absorb Identity relevance 2.97 · 44.8% (26 of 58 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Compelling Argument relevance 3.41 · 50.0% (29 of 58 decks)
- Cosmic Epiphany relevance 3.27 · 48.3% (28 of 58 decks)
- Counsel of the Soratami relevance 3.17 · 48.3% (28 of 58 decks)
- Cultural Exchange relevance 3.16 · 48.3% (28 of 58 decks)
- Confiscation Coup relevance 3.01 · 46.6% (27 of 58 decks)
- Deem Inferior relevance 2.97 · 43.1% (25 of 58 decks)
- Concentrate relevance 2.97 · 50.0% (29 of 58 decks)
EDH data for Consign to Dream: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 58 real decks.