Strength of Cedars
Played in 23 Sultai decks
Color Identity Spread
2.4% Sultai
All most relevant (10)
- Titanic Growth relevance 2.34 · 39.1% (9 of 23 decks)
- Become Immense relevance 2.20 · 34.8% (8 of 23 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 1.77 · 34.8% (8 of 23 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.83 · 52.2% (12 of 23 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.78 · 43.5% (10 of 23 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.76 · 39.1% (9 of 23 decks)
- Putrefy relevance 0.68 · 43.5% (10 of 23 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.68 · 34.8% (8 of 23 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.51 · 34.8% (8 of 23 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.45 · 34.8% (8 of 23 decks)
All creatures (1)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.68 · 34.8% (8 of 23 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.83 · 52.2% (12 of 23 decks)
All instants (5)
- Titanic Growth relevance 2.34 · 39.1% (9 of 23 decks)
- Become Immense relevance 2.20 · 34.8% (8 of 23 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 1.77 · 34.8% (8 of 23 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.76 · 39.1% (9 of 23 decks)
- Putrefy relevance 0.68 · 43.5% (10 of 23 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.78 · 43.5% (10 of 23 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.51 · 34.8% (8 of 23 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.45 · 34.8% (8 of 23 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.78 · 39.1% (9 of 23 decks)
All lands (2)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.69 · 47.8% (11 of 23 decks)
- Golgari Rot Farm relevance 0.61 · 34.8% (8 of 23 decks)
EDH data for Strength of Cedars: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 23 real decks.