Pilfering Imp
Played in 80 Dimir decks
Color Identity Spread
4.1% Dimir
- Black 1,342 · 69.3%
- Rakdos 249 · 12.9%
- Orzhov 100 · 5.2%
- Dimir 80 · 4.1%
- Golgari 42 · 2.2%
- Other (10) 123 · 6.4%
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (7)
- Sivitri Scarzam relevance 1.03 · 5.1% (2 of 39 decks)
- Nebuchadnezzar relevance 0.92 · 1.2% (3 of 256 decks)
- Ghost of Ramirez DePietro // Keskit, the Flesh Sculptor relevance 0.69 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Criminal Past // Volo, Itinerant Scholar relevance 0.69 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Feywild Visitor // Sivriss, Nightmare Speaker relevance 0.54 · 2.2% (1 of 46 decks)
- Wydwen, the Biting Gale relevance 0.47 · 1.3% (1 of 80 decks)
- Scion of Halaster // Volo, Itinerant Scholar relevance 0.46 · 1.2% (1 of 82 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Thought Erasure relevance 0.84 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Faerie Dreamthief relevance 0.79 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Biting-Palm Ninja relevance 0.73 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Battlefly Swarm relevance 0.72 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Ornithopter relevance 0.67 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Duress relevance 0.65 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Tormented Soul relevance 0.65 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Faerie Seer relevance 0.64 · 26.3% (21 of 80 decks)
- Siren Stormtamer relevance 0.63 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Unsummon relevance 0.62 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Changeling Outcast relevance 0.62 · 33.8% (27 of 80 decks)
- Hypnotic Siren relevance 0.62 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Mist-Cloaked Herald relevance 0.60 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Pilfer relevance 0.59 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.58 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Moon-Circuit Hacker relevance 0.56 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Mausoleum Wanderer relevance 0.55 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Ninja of the Deep Hours relevance 0.55 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Ingenious Infiltrator relevance 0.54 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Prosperous Thief relevance 0.54 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Gingerbrute relevance 0.54 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Mistblade Shinobi relevance 0.53 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Silver-Fur Master relevance 0.53 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 0.53 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.53 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Spectral Sailor relevance 0.52 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Dokuchi Silencer relevance 0.52 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Thousand-Faced Shadow relevance 0.51 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Moonsnare Specialist relevance 0.50 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Dimir Infiltrator relevance 0.50 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
All creatures (35)
- Faerie Dreamthief relevance 0.79 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Biting-Palm Ninja relevance 0.73 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Battlefly Swarm relevance 0.72 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Ornithopter relevance 0.67 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Tormented Soul relevance 0.65 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Faerie Seer relevance 0.64 · 26.3% (21 of 80 decks)
- Siren Stormtamer relevance 0.63 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Changeling Outcast relevance 0.62 · 33.8% (27 of 80 decks)
- Hypnotic Siren relevance 0.62 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Mist-Cloaked Herald relevance 0.60 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Moon-Circuit Hacker relevance 0.56 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Mausoleum Wanderer relevance 0.55 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Ninja of the Deep Hours relevance 0.55 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Ingenious Infiltrator relevance 0.54 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Prosperous Thief relevance 0.54 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Gingerbrute relevance 0.54 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Mistblade Shinobi relevance 0.53 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Silver-Fur Master relevance 0.53 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 0.53 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Spectral Sailor relevance 0.52 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Dokuchi Silencer relevance 0.52 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Thousand-Faced Shadow relevance 0.51 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Moonsnare Specialist relevance 0.50 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Dimir Infiltrator relevance 0.50 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Shadow of Mortality relevance 0.49 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Slither Blade relevance 0.48 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Triton Shorestalker relevance 0.46 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Gudul Lurker relevance 0.46 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Network Disruptor relevance 0.45 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Fallen Shinobi relevance 0.43 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Throat Slitter relevance 0.41 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Nezumi Prowler relevance 0.39 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Baleful Strix relevance 0.39 · 26.3% (21 of 80 decks)
- Silent-Blade Oni relevance 0.38 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Nashi, Moon Sage's Scion relevance 0.36 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Telepathy relevance 0.49 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
All instants (5)
- Unsummon relevance 0.62 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.58 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.53 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.38 · 31.3% (25 of 80 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.34 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Thought Erasure relevance 0.84 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Duress relevance 0.65 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Pilfer relevance 0.59 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Temporal Trespass relevance 0.37 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.36 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Diabolic Tutor relevance 0.33 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
All lands (3)
- Dimir Guildgate relevance 0.58 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Dismal Backwater relevance 0.54 · 27.5% (22 of 80 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.49 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
EDH data for Pilfering Imp: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 80 real decks.