Color Identity Spread
2.7% Gruul
All commanders (5)
- Cait, Cage Brawler relevance 1.99 · 2.7% (17 of 641 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 1.98 · 1.5% (28 of 1,837 decks)
- Scarlet Spider, Ben Reilly relevance 1.06 · 1.2% (6 of 505 decks)
- Ellie, Brick Master // Abby, Merciless Soldier relevance 0.73 · 2.4% (2 of 84 decks)
- Kraven, Proud Predator relevance 0.36 · 1.1% (1 of 93 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Diamond Weapon relevance 1.43 · 27.1% (38 of 140 decks)
- Primeval Protector relevance 1.12 · 24.3% (34 of 140 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 1.07 · 52.9% (74 of 140 decks)
- Titanoth Rex relevance 1.06 · 24.3% (34 of 140 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 1.03 · 21.4% (30 of 140 decks)
- Lumbering Megasloth relevance 0.78 · 12.9% (18 of 140 decks)
- Combustible Gearhulk relevance 0.72 · 20.7% (29 of 140 decks)
- Rhino, Barreling Brute relevance 0.72 · 16.4% (23 of 140 decks)
- Oliphaunt relevance 0.65 · 15.7% (22 of 140 decks)
- Genesis relevance 0.63 · 12.1% (17 of 140 decks)
- Giant Ankheg relevance 0.63 · 13.6% (19 of 140 decks)
- Slavering Branchsnapper relevance 0.63 · 12.1% (17 of 140 decks)
- Hierophant Bio-Titan relevance 0.63 · 11.4% (16 of 140 decks)
- Cleanup Crew relevance 0.63 · 12.1% (17 of 140 decks)
- Bygone Colossus relevance 0.63 · 10.0% (14 of 140 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.62 · 33.6% (47 of 140 decks)
- Molten Monstrosity relevance 0.62 · 10.0% (14 of 140 decks)
- Ancient Stone Idol relevance 0.61 · 10.7% (15 of 140 decks)
- Shriekwood Devourer relevance 0.60 · 13.6% (19 of 140 decks)
- Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 0.58 · 17.1% (24 of 140 decks)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 0.56 · 15.7% (22 of 140 decks)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 0.56 · 10.7% (15 of 140 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.54 · 14.3% (20 of 140 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 0.54 · 11.4% (16 of 140 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.53 · 12.1% (17 of 140 decks)
- Brawn relevance 0.53 · 13.6% (19 of 140 decks)
- Copper Host Crusher relevance 0.53 · 7.9% (11 of 140 decks)
- Ulvenwald Observer relevance 0.52 · 10.0% (14 of 140 decks)
- Coliseum Behemoth relevance 0.50 · 10.0% (14 of 140 decks)
- Flourishing Hunter relevance 0.50 · 8.6% (12 of 140 decks)
All creatures (47)
- Diamond Weapon relevance 1.43 · 27.1% (38 of 140 decks)
- Primeval Protector relevance 1.12 · 24.3% (34 of 140 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 1.07 · 52.9% (74 of 140 decks)
- Titanoth Rex relevance 1.06 · 24.3% (34 of 140 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 1.03 · 21.4% (30 of 140 decks)
- Lumbering Megasloth relevance 0.78 · 12.9% (18 of 140 decks)
- Combustible Gearhulk relevance 0.72 · 20.7% (29 of 140 decks)
- Rhino, Barreling Brute relevance 0.72 · 16.4% (23 of 140 decks)
- Oliphaunt relevance 0.65 · 15.7% (22 of 140 decks)
- Genesis relevance 0.63 · 12.1% (17 of 140 decks)
- Giant Ankheg relevance 0.63 · 13.6% (19 of 140 decks)
- Slavering Branchsnapper relevance 0.63 · 12.1% (17 of 140 decks)
- Hierophant Bio-Titan relevance 0.63 · 11.4% (16 of 140 decks)
- Cleanup Crew relevance 0.63 · 12.1% (17 of 140 decks)
- Bygone Colossus relevance 0.63 · 10.0% (14 of 140 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.62 · 33.6% (47 of 140 decks)
- Molten Monstrosity relevance 0.62 · 10.0% (14 of 140 decks)
- Ancient Stone Idol relevance 0.61 · 10.7% (15 of 140 decks)
- Shriekwood Devourer relevance 0.60 · 13.6% (19 of 140 decks)
- Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 0.58 · 17.1% (24 of 140 decks)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 0.56 · 15.7% (22 of 140 decks)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 0.56 · 10.7% (15 of 140 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.54 · 14.3% (20 of 140 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 0.54 · 11.4% (16 of 140 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.53 · 12.1% (17 of 140 decks)
- Brawn relevance 0.53 · 13.6% (19 of 140 decks)
- Copper Host Crusher relevance 0.53 · 7.9% (11 of 140 decks)
- Ulvenwald Observer relevance 0.52 · 10.0% (14 of 140 decks)
- Coliseum Behemoth relevance 0.50 · 10.0% (14 of 140 decks)
- Flourishing Hunter relevance 0.50 · 8.6% (12 of 140 decks)
- Cyclops of Eternal Fury relevance 0.50 · 10.0% (14 of 140 decks)
- Orchard Strider relevance 0.49 · 8.6% (12 of 140 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 0.48 · 9.3% (13 of 140 decks)
- Dread Linnorm // Scale Deflection relevance 0.48 · 9.3% (13 of 140 decks)
- Hamletback Goliath relevance 0.47 · 8.6% (12 of 140 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.47 · 15.0% (21 of 140 decks)
- Balamb T-Rexaur relevance 0.46 · 8.6% (12 of 140 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.46 · 15.7% (22 of 140 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.46 · 11.4% (16 of 140 decks)
- Boarding Party relevance 0.44 · 10.0% (14 of 140 decks)
- Engulfing Slagwurm relevance 0.44 · 7.9% (11 of 140 decks)
- Dawnglade Regent relevance 0.44 · 10.0% (14 of 140 decks)
- Marauding Mako relevance 0.44 · 6.4% (9 of 140 decks)
- Gruul Ragebeast relevance 0.43 · 12.9% (18 of 140 decks)
- Elvish Aberration relevance 0.43 · 8.6% (12 of 140 decks)
- Dragonlord Atarka relevance 0.43 · 10.7% (15 of 140 decks)
- Drakuseth, Maw of Flames relevance 0.43 · 15.0% (21 of 140 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Spinerock Knoll relevance 0.55 · 20.0% (28 of 140 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.45 · 32.1% (45 of 140 decks)
All lands (1)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.47 · 20.7% (29 of 140 decks)
EDH data for Ghoultree: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 140 real decks.