Malicious Eclipse
Played in 129 Orzhov decks
30+25+1+5+5+1+8+5+
Color Identity Spread
11.5% Orzhov
Most Relevant
Bat Colony 24.8% of decks
Bat Colony 24.8% of decks
Deep-Cavern Bat 30.2% of decks
Deep-Cavern Bat 30.2% of decks
Aclazotz, Deepest Betrayal // Temple of the Dead 28.7% of decks
Aclazotz, Deepest Betrayal // Temple of the Dead 28.7% of decks
Sonar Strike 23.3% of decks
Sonar Strike 23.3% of decks
Tithing Blade // Consuming Sepulcher 21.7% of decks
Tithing Blade // Consuming Sepulcher 21.7% of decks
Ruin-Lurker Bat 25.6% of decks
Ruin-Lurker Bat 25.6% of decks
All most relevant (30)
- Bat Colony relevance 1.45 · 24.8% (32 of 129 decks)
- Deep-Cavern Bat relevance 1.25 · 30.2% (39 of 129 decks)
- Aclazotz, Deepest Betrayal // Temple of the Dead relevance 1.18 · 28.7% (37 of 129 decks)
- Sonar Strike relevance 1.09 · 23.3% (30 of 129 decks)
- Tithing Blade // Consuming Sepulcher relevance 1.07 · 21.7% (28 of 129 decks)
- Ruin-Lurker Bat relevance 1.06 · 25.6% (33 of 129 decks)
- Moonrise Cleric relevance 1.04 · 25.6% (33 of 129 decks)
- Crumb and Get It relevance 1.04 · 20.9% (27 of 129 decks)
- Star Charter relevance 1.03 · 24.8% (32 of 129 decks)
- Moonstone Harbinger relevance 0.95 · 22.5% (29 of 129 decks)
- Starseer Mentor relevance 0.95 · 23.3% (30 of 129 decks)
- Banishing Light relevance 0.93 · 23.3% (30 of 129 decks)
- Starlit Soothsayer relevance 0.92 · 21.7% (28 of 129 decks)
- Wax-Wane Witness relevance 0.91 · 20.2% (26 of 129 decks)
- Glidedive Duo relevance 0.86 · 17.8% (23 of 129 decks)
- Glorifier of Suffering relevance 0.86 · 13.2% (17 of 129 decks)
- Bandit's Talent relevance 0.82 · 15.5% (20 of 129 decks)
- Moonstone Eulogist relevance 0.79 · 17.8% (23 of 129 decks)
- Stargaze relevance 0.78 · 20.2% (26 of 129 decks)
- Vito's Inquisitor relevance 0.78 · 12.4% (16 of 129 decks)
- Lifecreed Duo relevance 0.77 · 21.7% (28 of 129 decks)
- Bloodhunter Bat relevance 0.77 · 14.0% (18 of 129 decks)
- Courier Bat relevance 0.75 · 17.1% (22 of 129 decks)
- Luminous Rebuke relevance 0.74 · 12.4% (16 of 129 decks)
- Sanguine Evangelist relevance 0.74 · 17.1% (22 of 129 decks)
- Petrify relevance 0.74 · 16.3% (21 of 129 decks)
- Blind Hunter relevance 0.73 · 14.0% (18 of 129 decks)
- Acolyte of Aclazotz relevance 0.73 · 14.7% (19 of 129 decks)
- Essence Channeler relevance 0.73 · 22.5% (29 of 129 decks)
- Fanatical Offering relevance 0.68 · 16.3% (21 of 129 decks)
All creatures (25)
- Deep-Cavern Bat relevance 1.25 · 30.2% (39 of 129 decks)
- Aclazotz, Deepest Betrayal // Temple of the Dead relevance 1.18 · 28.7% (37 of 129 decks)
- Ruin-Lurker Bat relevance 1.06 · 25.6% (33 of 129 decks)
- Moonrise Cleric relevance 1.04 · 25.6% (33 of 129 decks)
- Star Charter relevance 1.03 · 24.8% (32 of 129 decks)
- Moonstone Harbinger relevance 0.95 · 22.5% (29 of 129 decks)
- Starseer Mentor relevance 0.95 · 23.3% (30 of 129 decks)
- Starlit Soothsayer relevance 0.92 · 21.7% (28 of 129 decks)
- Wax-Wane Witness relevance 0.91 · 20.2% (26 of 129 decks)
- Glidedive Duo relevance 0.86 · 17.8% (23 of 129 decks)
- Glorifier of Suffering relevance 0.86 · 13.2% (17 of 129 decks)
- Moonstone Eulogist relevance 0.79 · 17.8% (23 of 129 decks)
- Vito's Inquisitor relevance 0.78 · 12.4% (16 of 129 decks)
- Lifecreed Duo relevance 0.77 · 21.7% (28 of 129 decks)
- Bloodhunter Bat relevance 0.77 · 14.0% (18 of 129 decks)
- Courier Bat relevance 0.75 · 17.1% (22 of 129 decks)
- Sanguine Evangelist relevance 0.74 · 17.1% (22 of 129 decks)
- Blind Hunter relevance 0.73 · 14.0% (18 of 129 decks)
- Acolyte of Aclazotz relevance 0.73 · 14.7% (19 of 129 decks)
- Essence Channeler relevance 0.73 · 22.5% (29 of 129 decks)
- Gurmag Swiftwing relevance 0.67 · 14.0% (18 of 129 decks)
- Wolfbat relevance 0.65 · 10.9% (14 of 129 decks)
- Starscape Cleric relevance 0.65 · 25.6% (33 of 129 decks)
- Queen's Bay Paladin relevance 0.63 · 10.9% (14 of 129 decks)
- Bringer of the Last Gift relevance 0.63 · 10.9% (14 of 129 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Tithing Blade // Consuming Sepulcher relevance 1.07 · 21.7% (28 of 129 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Bat Colony relevance 1.45 · 24.8% (32 of 129 decks)
- Banishing Light relevance 0.93 · 23.3% (30 of 129 decks)
- Bandit's Talent relevance 0.82 · 15.5% (20 of 129 decks)
- Petrify relevance 0.74 · 16.3% (21 of 129 decks)
- Lunar Convocation relevance 0.64 · 24.8% (32 of 129 decks)
All instants (5)
- Sonar Strike relevance 1.09 · 23.3% (30 of 129 decks)
- Crumb and Get It relevance 1.04 · 20.9% (27 of 129 decks)
- Luminous Rebuke relevance 0.74 · 12.4% (16 of 129 decks)
- Fanatical Offering relevance 0.68 · 16.3% (21 of 129 decks)
- Nocturnal Hunger relevance 0.63 · 10.9% (14 of 129 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Stargaze relevance 0.78 · 20.2% (26 of 129 decks)
All utility lands (8)
- Cavernous Maw relevance 1.03 · 15.5% (20 of 129 decks)
- Captivating Cave relevance 1.03 · 17.8% (23 of 129 decks)
- Pit of Offerings relevance 0.98 · 21.7% (28 of 129 decks)
- Hidden Courtyard relevance 0.94 · 19.4% (25 of 129 decks)
- Volatile Fault relevance 0.93 · 17.8% (23 of 129 decks)
- Hidden Necropolis relevance 0.80 · 16.3% (21 of 129 decks)
- Scoured Barrens relevance 0.74 · 43.4% (56 of 129 decks)
- Mudflat Village relevance 0.65 · 14.7% (19 of 129 decks)
All lands (5)
- Promising Vein relevance 0.78 · 15.5% (20 of 129 decks)
- Forgotten Monument relevance 0.77 · 12.4% (16 of 129 decks)
- Grasping Shadows // Shadows' Lair relevance 0.74 · 12.4% (16 of 129 decks)
- Sunken Citadel relevance 0.63 · 10.9% (14 of 129 decks)
- Tarrian's Journal // The Tomb of Aclazotz relevance 0.62 · 15.5% (20 of 129 decks)
EDH data for Malicious Eclipse: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 129 real decks.









































