Comparative Analysis
Played in 139 Azorius decks
Color Identity Spread
Most Relevant
All most relevant (30)
- Contradict relevance 2.62 · 39.6% (55 of 139 decks)
- Careful Consideration relevance 2.55 · 38.8% (54 of 139 decks)
- Catalog relevance 2.39 · 36.0% (50 of 139 decks)
- Counsel of the Soratami relevance 2.36 · 36.0% (50 of 139 decks)
- Concentrate relevance 2.34 · 39.6% (55 of 139 decks)
- Commander's Insight relevance 2.34 · 38.8% (54 of 139 decks)
- Case the Joint relevance 2.32 · 34.5% (48 of 139 decks)
- Cosmic Epiphany relevance 2.24 · 33.1% (46 of 139 decks)
- Call to Heel relevance 2.19 · 32.4% (45 of 139 decks)
- Amass the Components relevance 2.13 · 34.5% (48 of 139 decks)
- Brilliant Plan relevance 2.13 · 30.9% (43 of 139 decks)
- Compulsion relevance 2.13 · 33.8% (47 of 139 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 2.08 · 30.2% (42 of 139 decks)
- Commence the Endgame relevance 2.07 · 31.7% (44 of 139 decks)
- Ancestral Reminiscence relevance 2.06 · 34.5% (48 of 139 decks)
- Braingeyser relevance 2.05 · 37.4% (52 of 139 decks)
- Compulsive Research relevance 2.03 · 42.4% (59 of 139 decks)
- Artificer's Epiphany relevance 1.99 · 33.1% (46 of 139 decks)
- Bone to Ash relevance 1.99 · 33.1% (46 of 139 decks)
- Breakthrough relevance 1.99 · 30.9% (43 of 139 decks)
- Cloak of Feathers relevance 1.99 · 28.8% (40 of 139 decks)
- Chemister's Insight relevance 1.98 · 33.1% (46 of 139 decks)
- Complicate relevance 1.98 · 30.2% (42 of 139 decks)
- Clairvoyance relevance 1.96 · 30.9% (43 of 139 decks)
- Decoy Gambit relevance 1.96 · 30.2% (42 of 139 decks)
- Crippling Chill relevance 1.95 · 32.4% (45 of 139 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 1.95 · 32.4% (45 of 139 decks)
- Arcane Investigator relevance 1.93 · 28.8% (40 of 139 decks)
- Deem Inferior relevance 1.93 · 28.1% (39 of 139 decks)
- Arcane Epiphany relevance 1.93 · 31.7% (44 of 139 decks)
All creatures (7)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 2.08 · 30.2% (42 of 139 decks)
- Arcane Investigator relevance 1.93 · 28.8% (40 of 139 decks)
- Captain of Umbar relevance 1.92 · 28.8% (40 of 139 decks)
- Aven Fisher relevance 1.87 · 28.1% (39 of 139 decks)
- Bellowing Crier relevance 1.85 · 28.8% (40 of 139 decks)
- Alchemist's Apprentice relevance 1.85 · 28.8% (40 of 139 decks)
- Dirgur Focusmage // Braingeyser relevance 1.81 · 30.9% (43 of 139 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Compulsion relevance 2.13 · 33.8% (47 of 139 decks)
All instants (26)
- Contradict relevance 2.62 · 39.6% (55 of 139 decks)
- Careful Consideration relevance 2.55 · 38.8% (54 of 139 decks)
- Catalog relevance 2.39 · 36.0% (50 of 139 decks)
- Commander's Insight relevance 2.34 · 38.8% (54 of 139 decks)
- Case the Joint relevance 2.32 · 34.5% (48 of 139 decks)
- Call to Heel relevance 2.19 · 32.4% (45 of 139 decks)
- Commence the Endgame relevance 2.07 · 31.7% (44 of 139 decks)
- Artificer's Epiphany relevance 1.99 · 33.1% (46 of 139 decks)
- Bone to Ash relevance 1.99 · 33.1% (46 of 139 decks)
- Chemister's Insight relevance 1.98 · 33.1% (46 of 139 decks)
- Complicate relevance 1.98 · 30.2% (42 of 139 decks)
- Clairvoyance relevance 1.96 · 30.9% (43 of 139 decks)
- Decoy Gambit relevance 1.96 · 30.2% (42 of 139 decks)
- Crippling Chill relevance 1.95 · 32.4% (45 of 139 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 1.95 · 32.4% (45 of 139 decks)
- Arcane Epiphany relevance 1.93 · 31.7% (44 of 139 decks)
- Contact Other Plane relevance 1.93 · 36.0% (50 of 139 decks)
- Deny Entry relevance 1.91 · 30.2% (42 of 139 decks)
- Bewildering Blizzard relevance 1.90 · 28.1% (39 of 139 decks)
- Arrester's Admonition relevance 1.90 · 30.2% (42 of 139 decks)
- Accumulated Knowledge relevance 1.88 · 28.1% (39 of 139 decks)
- Delightful Discovery relevance 1.86 · 30.2% (42 of 139 decks)
- Flow of Knowledge relevance 1.86 · 29.5% (41 of 139 decks)
- Cerebral Download relevance 1.86 · 30.9% (43 of 139 decks)
- Draconic Lore relevance 1.85 · 27.3% (38 of 139 decks)
- Depower relevance 1.82 · 28.1% (39 of 139 decks)
All sorceries (16)
- Counsel of the Soratami relevance 2.36 · 36.0% (50 of 139 decks)
- Concentrate relevance 2.34 · 39.6% (55 of 139 decks)
- Cosmic Epiphany relevance 2.24 · 33.1% (46 of 139 decks)
- Amass the Components relevance 2.13 · 34.5% (48 of 139 decks)
- Brilliant Plan relevance 2.13 · 30.9% (43 of 139 decks)
- Ancestral Reminiscence relevance 2.06 · 34.5% (48 of 139 decks)
- Braingeyser relevance 2.05 · 37.4% (52 of 139 decks)
- Compulsive Research relevance 2.03 · 42.4% (59 of 139 decks)
- Breakthrough relevance 1.99 · 30.9% (43 of 139 decks)
- Cloak of Feathers relevance 1.99 · 28.8% (40 of 139 decks)
- Deem Inferior relevance 1.93 · 28.1% (39 of 139 decks)
- Boon of the Wish-Giver relevance 1.91 · 30.9% (43 of 139 decks)
- Compelling Argument relevance 1.91 · 28.1% (39 of 139 decks)
- Drag Under relevance 1.85 · 27.3% (38 of 139 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 1.83 · 42.4% (59 of 139 decks)
- Arcane Endeavor relevance 1.81 · 28.8% (40 of 139 decks)
EDH data for Comparative Analysis: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 139 real decks.