Sugar Rush
Played in 215 Rakdos decks
Color Identity Spread
7.8% Rakdos
630+7+2+1+27+10+1+2+
That's every commander.
All commanders (6)
- Zuko, Seeking Honor relevance 0.77 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Francisco, Fowl Marauder // Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar relevance 0.64 · 1.8% (2 of 112 decks)
- Cultist of the Absolute // Livaan, Cultist of Tiamat relevance 0.56 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Scarlet Spider, Kaine relevance 0.50 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar // Sengir, the Dark Baron relevance 0.44 · 2.4% (1 of 41 decks)
- Bullseye, Death Dealer relevance 0.33 · 1.0% (1 of 97 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Bladebrand relevance 1.34 · 26.5% (57 of 215 decks)
- Might of the Meek relevance 1.15 · 20.5% (44 of 215 decks)
- Fists of Flame relevance 1.09 · 20.5% (44 of 215 decks)
- Expedite relevance 0.93 · 23.3% (50 of 215 decks)
- Haste Magic relevance 0.91 · 17.2% (37 of 215 decks)
- Crash Through relevance 0.88 · 19.5% (42 of 215 decks)
- Cornered by Black Mages relevance 0.83 · 30.7% (66 of 215 decks)
- Black Mage's Rod relevance 0.81 · 31.6% (68 of 215 decks)
- Ancestral Anger relevance 0.70 · 12.6% (27 of 215 decks)
- Blazing Crescendo relevance 0.69 · 12.1% (26 of 215 decks)
- Aphotic Wisps relevance 0.69 · 15.3% (33 of 215 decks)
- Mysidian Elder relevance 0.68 · 22.8% (49 of 215 decks)
- Crimson Wisps relevance 0.67 · 14.9% (32 of 215 decks)
- Cremate relevance 0.66 · 15.3% (33 of 215 decks)
- Circle of Power relevance 0.65 · 23.7% (51 of 215 decks)
- Black Waltz No. 3 relevance 0.64 · 24.7% (53 of 215 decks)
- Guttersnipe relevance 0.63 · 26.0% (56 of 215 decks)
- You Are Already Dead relevance 0.62 · 12.6% (27 of 215 decks)
- Impolite Entrance relevance 0.60 · 12.6% (27 of 215 decks)
- Nighthaze relevance 0.60 · 9.8% (21 of 215 decks)
- Red Mage's Rapier relevance 0.59 · 12.6% (27 of 215 decks)
- Renegade Tactics relevance 0.59 · 12.1% (26 of 215 decks)
- Queen Brahne relevance 0.59 · 19.5% (42 of 215 decks)
- Energybending relevance 0.58 · 8.4% (18 of 215 decks)
- Siege Smash relevance 0.57 · 10.7% (23 of 215 decks)
- Accelerate relevance 0.55 · 8.4% (18 of 215 decks)
- Warlord's Fury relevance 0.55 · 10.2% (22 of 215 decks)
- Titan's Strength relevance 0.54 · 8.4% (18 of 215 decks)
- Fake Your Own Death relevance 0.54 · 19.5% (42 of 215 decks)
- Thrill of Possibility relevance 0.54 · 29.3% (63 of 215 decks)
All creatures (7)
- Mysidian Elder relevance 0.68 · 22.8% (49 of 215 decks)
- Black Waltz No. 3 relevance 0.64 · 24.7% (53 of 215 decks)
- Guttersnipe relevance 0.63 · 26.0% (56 of 215 decks)
- Queen Brahne relevance 0.59 · 19.5% (42 of 215 decks)
- Coruscation Mage relevance 0.52 · 21.4% (46 of 215 decks)
- Firebrand Archer relevance 0.48 · 17.2% (37 of 215 decks)
- Zada, Hedron Grinder relevance 0.48 · 7.9% (17 of 215 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Black Mage's Rod relevance 0.81 · 31.6% (68 of 215 decks)
- Red Mage's Rapier relevance 0.59 · 12.6% (27 of 215 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Leyline of Resonance relevance 0.44 · 7.0% (15 of 215 decks)
All instants (27)
- Bladebrand relevance 1.34 · 26.5% (57 of 215 decks)
- Might of the Meek relevance 1.15 · 20.5% (44 of 215 decks)
- Fists of Flame relevance 1.09 · 20.5% (44 of 215 decks)
- Expedite relevance 0.93 · 23.3% (50 of 215 decks)
- Haste Magic relevance 0.91 · 17.2% (37 of 215 decks)
- Blazing Crescendo relevance 0.69 · 12.1% (26 of 215 decks)
- Aphotic Wisps relevance 0.69 · 15.3% (33 of 215 decks)
- Crimson Wisps relevance 0.67 · 14.9% (32 of 215 decks)
- Cremate relevance 0.66 · 15.3% (33 of 215 decks)
- You Are Already Dead relevance 0.62 · 12.6% (27 of 215 decks)
- Energybending relevance 0.58 · 8.4% (18 of 215 decks)
- Siege Smash relevance 0.57 · 10.7% (23 of 215 decks)
- Accelerate relevance 0.55 · 8.4% (18 of 215 decks)
- Titan's Strength relevance 0.54 · 8.4% (18 of 215 decks)
- Fake Your Own Death relevance 0.54 · 19.5% (42 of 215 decks)
- Thrill of Possibility relevance 0.54 · 29.3% (63 of 215 decks)
- Monstrous Rage relevance 0.53 · 9.3% (20 of 215 decks)
- Shock relevance 0.53 · 14.9% (32 of 215 decks)
- Lightning Strike relevance 0.52 · 14.0% (30 of 215 decks)
- Murder relevance 0.50 · 14.9% (32 of 215 decks)
- Infuriate relevance 0.49 · 7.9% (17 of 215 decks)
- Mirrodin Avenged relevance 0.49 · 9.3% (20 of 215 decks)
- Laughing Mad relevance 0.47 · 14.0% (30 of 215 decks)
- Abrade relevance 0.45 · 28.8% (62 of 215 decks)
- Maximum Overdrive relevance 0.45 · 8.8% (19 of 215 decks)
- Reckless Ransacking relevance 0.44 · 8.8% (19 of 215 decks)
- Vincent's Limit Break relevance 0.43 · 9.3% (20 of 215 decks)
All sorceries (10)
- Crash Through relevance 0.88 · 19.5% (42 of 215 decks)
- Cornered by Black Mages relevance 0.83 · 30.7% (66 of 215 decks)
- Ancestral Anger relevance 0.70 · 12.6% (27 of 215 decks)
- Circle of Power relevance 0.65 · 23.7% (51 of 215 decks)
- Impolite Entrance relevance 0.60 · 12.6% (27 of 215 decks)
- Nighthaze relevance 0.60 · 9.8% (21 of 215 decks)
- Renegade Tactics relevance 0.59 · 12.1% (26 of 215 decks)
- Warlord's Fury relevance 0.55 · 10.2% (22 of 215 decks)
- Risky Shortcut relevance 0.53 · 14.4% (31 of 215 decks)
- Witch's Mark relevance 0.50 · 10.2% (22 of 215 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Lindblum, Industrial Regency // Mage Siege relevance 0.51 · 19.1% (41 of 215 decks)
All lands (2)
- Bloodfell Caves relevance 0.60 · 33.0% (71 of 215 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.44 · 25.1% (54 of 215 decks)
EDH data for Sugar Rush: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 215 real decks.



















































