Squash
Played in 60 Red decks
730+17+6+4+6+4+4+1+
Color Identity Spread
2.4% Red
Commanders
Zalto, Fire Giant Duke 9.3% of decks
Zalto, Fire Giant Duke 9.3% of decks
Lovisa Coldeyes 1.7% of decks
Lovisa Coldeyes 1.7% of decks
Dargo, the Shipwrecker // Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar 4.0% of decks
Dargo, the Shipwrecker // Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar 4.0% of decks
Tomik, Izzet Sparkmage 2.9% of decks
Tomik, Izzet Sparkmage 2.9% of decks
Dáin Ironfoot 3.7% of decks
Dáin Ironfoot 3.7% of decks
Tyrox, Saurid Tyrant 1.6% of decks
Tyrox, Saurid Tyrant 1.6% of decks
Most Relevant
Calamity Bearer 38.3% of decks
Calamity Bearer 38.3% of decks
Quakebringer 36.7% of decks
Quakebringer 36.7% of decks
Hamletback Goliath 23.3% of decks
Hamletback Goliath 23.3% of decks
Demon Bolt 21.7% of decks
Demon Bolt 21.7% of decks
Loot Dispute 18.3% of decks
Loot Dispute 18.3% of decks
Basalt Ravager 15.0% of decks
Basalt Ravager 15.0% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (7)
- Zalto, Fire Giant Duke relevance 2.74 · 9.3% (11 of 118 decks)
- Lovisa Coldeyes relevance 1.62 · 1.7% (7 of 421 decks)
- Dargo, the Shipwrecker // Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar relevance 1.31 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Tomik, Izzet Sparkmage relevance 0.97 · 2.9% (2 of 69 decks)
- Dáin Ironfoot relevance 0.64 · 3.7% (1 of 27 decks)
- Tyrox, Saurid Tyrant relevance 0.53 · 1.6% (1 of 63 decks)
- Gimli, Counter of Kills relevance 0.48 · 1.0% (1 of 97 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Calamity Bearer relevance 2.43 · 38.3% (23 of 60 decks)
- Quakebringer relevance 2.00 · 36.7% (22 of 60 decks)
- Hamletback Goliath relevance 1.20 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Demon Bolt relevance 1.14 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Loot Dispute relevance 1.10 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Basalt Ravager relevance 1.01 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Warchief Giant relevance 0.93 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Iron-Fist Pulverizer relevance 0.91 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Tectonic Giant relevance 0.90 · 25.0% (15 of 60 decks)
- Sarevok's Tome relevance 0.87 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Two-Headed Giant relevance 0.87 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Two-Headed Hunter // Twice the Rage relevance 0.84 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Boldwyr Intimidator relevance 0.81 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Goliath Daydreamer relevance 0.79 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Stirring Bard relevance 0.78 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Caves of Chaos Adventurer relevance 0.77 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Inferno Titan relevance 0.72 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Flick a Coin relevance 0.68 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Fiendlash relevance 0.68 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Fling relevance 0.62 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Darksteel Plate relevance 0.52 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Tormenting Voice relevance 0.50 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Pain for All relevance 0.45 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Fire Diamond relevance 0.44 · 26.7% (16 of 60 decks)
- Thrill of Possibility relevance 0.44 · 35.0% (21 of 60 decks)
- Gratuitous Violence relevance 0.43 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Warstorm Surge relevance 0.42 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Brash Taunter relevance 0.40 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Defiler of Instinct relevance 0.40 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Light Up the Stage relevance 0.38 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
All creatures (17)
- Calamity Bearer relevance 2.43 · 38.3% (23 of 60 decks)
- Quakebringer relevance 2.00 · 36.7% (22 of 60 decks)
- Hamletback Goliath relevance 1.20 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Basalt Ravager relevance 1.01 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Warchief Giant relevance 0.93 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Iron-Fist Pulverizer relevance 0.91 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Tectonic Giant relevance 0.90 · 25.0% (15 of 60 decks)
- Two-Headed Giant relevance 0.87 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Two-Headed Hunter // Twice the Rage relevance 0.84 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Boldwyr Intimidator relevance 0.81 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Goliath Daydreamer relevance 0.79 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Stirring Bard relevance 0.78 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Caves of Chaos Adventurer relevance 0.77 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Inferno Titan relevance 0.72 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Brash Taunter relevance 0.40 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Defiler of Instinct relevance 0.40 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.31 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
All artifacts (6)
- Sarevok's Tome relevance 0.87 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Fiendlash relevance 0.68 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Darksteel Plate relevance 0.52 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Fire Diamond relevance 0.44 · 26.7% (16 of 60 decks)
- The Fire Crystal relevance 0.36 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Hazoret's Monument relevance 0.33 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Loot Dispute relevance 1.10 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Pain for All relevance 0.45 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Gratuitous Violence relevance 0.43 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Warstorm Surge relevance 0.42 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
All instants (6)
- Demon Bolt relevance 1.14 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Flick a Coin relevance 0.68 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Fling relevance 0.62 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Thrill of Possibility relevance 0.44 · 35.0% (21 of 60 decks)
- Bolt Bend relevance 0.36 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Demand Answers relevance 0.32 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Tormenting Voice relevance 0.50 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Light Up the Stage relevance 0.38 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Chain Reaction relevance 0.33 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Seize the Spoils relevance 0.30 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Spinerock Knoll relevance 0.52 · 26.7% (16 of 60 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.45 · 26.7% (16 of 60 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.40 · 26.7% (16 of 60 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.36 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
All lands (1)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.35 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
EDH data for Squash: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 60 real decks.






































