Oblivion's Hunger
Played in 252 Dimir decks
Color Identity Spread
3.6% Dimir
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (8)
- The Master, Mesmerist relevance 2.44 · 8.4% (19 of 227 decks)
- Tiger Shark, Abyssal Hunter relevance 1.72 · 18.5% (5 of 27 decks)
- Lazav, Familiar Stranger relevance 1.27 · 1.6% (11 of 686 decks)
- Renari, Merchant of Marvels // Cultist of the Absolute relevance 0.89 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
- Vhal, Candlekeep Researcher // Agent of the Shadow Thieves relevance 0.80 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Sharkey, Tyrant of the Shire relevance 0.39 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Sarevok, Deathbringer // Clan Crafter relevance 0.36 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Locke Cole relevance 0.31 · 1.1% (1 of 91 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Shore Up relevance 0.99 · 23.8% (60 of 252 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.94 · 20.2% (51 of 252 decks)
- Alesha's Legacy relevance 0.85 · 15.9% (40 of 252 decks)
- Offer Immortality relevance 0.81 · 15.9% (40 of 252 decks)
- Armor of Shadows relevance 0.73 · 12.7% (32 of 252 decks)
- Maximum Overdrive relevance 0.72 · 11.9% (30 of 252 decks)
- Murder relevance 0.58 · 20.6% (52 of 252 decks)
- Refocus relevance 0.54 · 8.3% (21 of 252 decks)
- Fogwalker relevance 0.53 · 7.9% (20 of 252 decks)
- Undercity Dire Rat relevance 0.52 · 9.9% (25 of 252 decks)
- Professor's Warning relevance 0.51 · 8.3% (21 of 252 decks)
- Battle-Rage Blessing relevance 0.51 · 8.3% (21 of 252 decks)
- Cast Down relevance 0.50 · 9.9% (25 of 252 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.49 · 12.7% (32 of 252 decks)
- Unlikely Aid relevance 0.49 · 7.1% (18 of 252 decks)
- Refute relevance 0.48 · 11.9% (30 of 252 decks)
- Bladebrand relevance 0.48 · 8.3% (21 of 252 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.47 · 13.1% (33 of 252 decks)
- Ogre Slumlord relevance 0.46 · 12.3% (31 of 252 decks)
- Rancid Rats relevance 0.45 · 8.3% (21 of 252 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.45 · 21.4% (54 of 252 decks)
- Royal Assassin relevance 0.44 · 10.7% (27 of 252 decks)
- Go for the Throat relevance 0.44 · 22.2% (56 of 252 decks)
- Cybermat relevance 0.43 · 6.3% (16 of 252 decks)
- Time Beetle relevance 0.41 · 6.3% (16 of 252 decks)
- Persistent Marshstalker relevance 0.41 · 9.5% (24 of 252 decks)
- Nezumi Graverobber // Nighteyes the Desecrator relevance 0.41 · 6.7% (17 of 252 decks)
- Devious Cover-Up relevance 0.41 · 6.7% (17 of 252 decks)
- Shoreline Looter relevance 0.40 · 11.5% (29 of 252 decks)
- Skeleton Key relevance 0.40 · 6.7% (17 of 252 decks)
All creatures (17)
- Fogwalker relevance 0.53 · 7.9% (20 of 252 decks)
- Undercity Dire Rat relevance 0.52 · 9.9% (25 of 252 decks)
- Ogre Slumlord relevance 0.46 · 12.3% (31 of 252 decks)
- Rancid Rats relevance 0.45 · 8.3% (21 of 252 decks)
- Royal Assassin relevance 0.44 · 10.7% (27 of 252 decks)
- Cybermat relevance 0.43 · 6.3% (16 of 252 decks)
- Time Beetle relevance 0.41 · 6.3% (16 of 252 decks)
- Persistent Marshstalker relevance 0.41 · 9.5% (24 of 252 decks)
- Nezumi Graverobber // Nighteyes the Desecrator relevance 0.41 · 6.7% (17 of 252 decks)
- Shoreline Looter relevance 0.40 · 11.5% (29 of 252 decks)
- Lord Skitter, Sewer King relevance 0.40 · 10.3% (26 of 252 decks)
- Nanoform Sentinel relevance 0.40 · 6.0% (15 of 252 decks)
- Typhoid Rats relevance 0.40 · 8.3% (21 of 252 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 0.40 · 10.7% (27 of 252 decks)
- Swarm of Rats relevance 0.38 · 6.7% (17 of 252 decks)
- Morbid Opportunist relevance 0.38 · 11.5% (29 of 252 decks)
- Nightwhorl Hermit relevance 0.38 · 7.1% (18 of 252 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.45 · 21.4% (54 of 252 decks)
- Skeleton Key relevance 0.40 · 6.7% (17 of 252 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.39 · 25.4% (64 of 252 decks)
All instants (22)
- Shore Up relevance 0.99 · 23.8% (60 of 252 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.94 · 20.2% (51 of 252 decks)
- Alesha's Legacy relevance 0.85 · 15.9% (40 of 252 decks)
- Offer Immortality relevance 0.81 · 15.9% (40 of 252 decks)
- Armor of Shadows relevance 0.73 · 12.7% (32 of 252 decks)
- Maximum Overdrive relevance 0.72 · 11.9% (30 of 252 decks)
- Murder relevance 0.58 · 20.6% (52 of 252 decks)
- Refocus relevance 0.54 · 8.3% (21 of 252 decks)
- Professor's Warning relevance 0.51 · 8.3% (21 of 252 decks)
- Battle-Rage Blessing relevance 0.51 · 8.3% (21 of 252 decks)
- Cast Down relevance 0.50 · 9.9% (25 of 252 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.49 · 12.7% (32 of 252 decks)
- Unlikely Aid relevance 0.49 · 7.1% (18 of 252 decks)
- Refute relevance 0.48 · 11.9% (30 of 252 decks)
- Bladebrand relevance 0.48 · 8.3% (21 of 252 decks)
- Go for the Throat relevance 0.44 · 22.2% (56 of 252 decks)
- Devious Cover-Up relevance 0.41 · 6.7% (17 of 252 decks)
- Turn Aside relevance 0.40 · 7.9% (20 of 252 decks)
- Spinal Embrace relevance 0.39 · 7.9% (20 of 252 decks)
- Keep Safe relevance 0.39 · 7.9% (20 of 252 decks)
- Dive Down relevance 0.39 · 7.1% (18 of 252 decks)
- Fake Your Own Death relevance 0.38 · 9.5% (24 of 252 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.47 · 13.1% (33 of 252 decks)
- Fell relevance 0.40 · 9.9% (25 of 252 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Waterfront District relevance 0.42 · 11.1% (28 of 252 decks)
All lands (5)
- Dismal Backwater relevance 0.70 · 35.7% (90 of 252 decks)
- Submerged Boneyard relevance 0.69 · 21.8% (55 of 252 decks)
- Dimir Guildgate relevance 0.64 · 21.8% (55 of 252 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.52 · 21.8% (55 of 252 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.43 · 21.8% (55 of 252 decks)
EDH data for Oblivion's Hunger: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 252 real decks.