Ridgescale Tusker
Played in 586 Gruul decks
Color Identity Spread
39.8% Gruul
All commanders (4)
- Slinza, the Spiked Stampede relevance 4.69 · 15.7% (500 of 3,183 decks)
- Slurrk, All-Ingesting // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.55 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.25 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Ellie, Brick Master // Abby, Merciless Soldier relevance 0.21 · 1.2% (1 of 85 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Krosan Warchief relevance 3.34 · 77.8% (456 of 586 decks)
- Herd Baloth relevance 3.01 · 70.1% (411 of 586 decks)
- Wirewood Savage relevance 2.81 · 62.6% (367 of 586 decks)
- Woodland Liege relevance 2.80 · 62.8% (368 of 586 decks)
- Battlefront Krushok relevance 2.47 · 46.4% (272 of 586 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 2.36 · 75.8% (444 of 586 decks)
- Spearbreaker Behemoth relevance 2.24 · 60.1% (352 of 586 decks)
- Herald of Ilharg relevance 2.11 · 50.7% (297 of 586 decks)
- Ulvenwald Oddity // Ulvenwald Behemoth relevance 2.07 · 50.9% (298 of 586 decks)
- Renegade Krasis relevance 2.07 · 36.3% (213 of 586 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 2.06 · 67.4% (395 of 586 decks)
- Caller of the Pack relevance 2.05 · 43.9% (257 of 586 decks)
- Nylea's Forerunner relevance 2.03 · 44.2% (259 of 586 decks)
- Fangren Firstborn relevance 2.00 · 38.7% (227 of 586 decks)
- Kona, Rescue Beastie relevance 1.97 · 52.9% (310 of 586 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 1.95 · 55.8% (327 of 586 decks)
- Siege Behemoth relevance 1.93 · 47.3% (277 of 586 decks)
- Quartzwood Crasher relevance 1.93 · 67.1% (393 of 586 decks)
- Garruk's Horde relevance 1.84 · 42.7% (250 of 586 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 1.82 · 75.4% (442 of 586 decks)
- Spellbreaker Behemoth relevance 1.80 · 44.7% (262 of 586 decks)
- Manglehorn relevance 1.80 · 56.0% (328 of 586 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.74 · 77.0% (451 of 586 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 1.73 · 47.6% (279 of 586 decks)
- Gnarlid Colony relevance 1.70 · 37.9% (222 of 586 decks)
- Paleoloth relevance 1.69 · 37.9% (222 of 586 decks)
- Aether Charge relevance 1.67 · 31.9% (187 of 586 decks)
- Thragtusk relevance 1.61 · 30.4% (178 of 586 decks)
- Axebane Ferox relevance 1.60 · 29.5% (173 of 586 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 1.57 · 50.0% (293 of 586 decks)
All creatures (43)
- Krosan Warchief relevance 3.34 · 77.8% (456 of 586 decks)
- Herd Baloth relevance 3.01 · 70.1% (411 of 586 decks)
- Wirewood Savage relevance 2.81 · 62.6% (367 of 586 decks)
- Woodland Liege relevance 2.80 · 62.8% (368 of 586 decks)
- Battlefront Krushok relevance 2.47 · 46.4% (272 of 586 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 2.36 · 75.8% (444 of 586 decks)
- Spearbreaker Behemoth relevance 2.24 · 60.1% (352 of 586 decks)
- Herald of Ilharg relevance 2.11 · 50.7% (297 of 586 decks)
- Ulvenwald Oddity // Ulvenwald Behemoth relevance 2.07 · 50.9% (298 of 586 decks)
- Renegade Krasis relevance 2.07 · 36.3% (213 of 586 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 2.06 · 67.4% (395 of 586 decks)
- Caller of the Pack relevance 2.05 · 43.9% (257 of 586 decks)
- Nylea's Forerunner relevance 2.03 · 44.2% (259 of 586 decks)
- Fangren Firstborn relevance 2.00 · 38.7% (227 of 586 decks)
- Kona, Rescue Beastie relevance 1.97 · 52.9% (310 of 586 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 1.95 · 55.8% (327 of 586 decks)
- Siege Behemoth relevance 1.93 · 47.3% (277 of 586 decks)
- Quartzwood Crasher relevance 1.93 · 67.1% (393 of 586 decks)
- Garruk's Horde relevance 1.84 · 42.7% (250 of 586 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 1.82 · 75.4% (442 of 586 decks)
- Spellbreaker Behemoth relevance 1.80 · 44.7% (262 of 586 decks)
- Manglehorn relevance 1.80 · 56.0% (328 of 586 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.74 · 77.0% (451 of 586 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 1.73 · 47.6% (279 of 586 decks)
- Gnarlid Colony relevance 1.70 · 37.9% (222 of 586 decks)
- Paleoloth relevance 1.69 · 37.9% (222 of 586 decks)
- Thragtusk relevance 1.61 · 30.4% (178 of 586 decks)
- Axebane Ferox relevance 1.60 · 29.5% (173 of 586 decks)
- Gruul Ragebeast relevance 1.55 · 45.9% (269 of 586 decks)
- Goobbue Gardener relevance 1.53 · 31.1% (182 of 586 decks)
- Ravenous Baloth relevance 1.52 · 28.0% (164 of 586 decks)
- Garruk's Harbinger relevance 1.51 · 29.9% (175 of 586 decks)
- Giant Cindermaw relevance 1.44 · 30.4% (178 of 586 decks)
- Frenzied Baloth relevance 1.42 · 50.0% (293 of 586 decks)
- Indrik Stomphowler relevance 1.41 · 24.4% (143 of 586 decks)
- Arboreal Grazer relevance 1.40 · 34.3% (201 of 586 decks)
- Bloated Contaminator relevance 1.37 · 29.5% (173 of 586 decks)
- Armored Scrapgorger relevance 1.33 · 32.3% (189 of 586 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 1.13 · 37.4% (219 of 586 decks)
- Red XIII, Proud Warrior relevance 1.11 · 31.7% (186 of 586 decks)
- Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 1.02 · 38.6% (226 of 586 decks)
- Grave Sifter relevance 1.01 · 17.2% (101 of 586 decks)
- Coliseum Behemoth relevance 1.00 · 20.0% (117 of 586 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 1.05 · 25.3% (148 of 586 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Aether Charge relevance 1.67 · 31.9% (187 of 586 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 1.12 · 42.8% (251 of 586 decks)
All instants (1)
- Inspiring Call relevance 1.21 · 52.6% (308 of 586 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 1.57 · 50.0% (293 of 586 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 1.02 · 26.1% (153 of 586 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Contested Cliffs relevance 2.09 · 49.0% (287 of 586 decks)
EDH data for Ridgescale Tusker: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 586 real decks.