Trained Armodon
Played in 148 Selesnya decks
430+46+4+
Color Identity Spread
37.8% Selesnya
-
Green 194 · 49.5%
-
Selesnya 148 · 37.8%
-
Golgari 23 · 5.9%
- Other (10) 27 · 6.9%
Commanders
Jasmine Boreal of the Seven 2.8% of decks
Jasmine Boreal of the Seven 2.8% of decks
Jasmine Boreal 11.4% of decks
Jasmine Boreal 11.4% of decks
Master Chef // Lulu, Loyal Hollyphant 2.7% of decks
Master Chef // Lulu, Loyal Hollyphant 2.7% of decks
Sir Shandlar of Eberyn 3.6% of decks
Sir Shandlar of Eberyn 3.6% of decks
Most Relevant
Grizzly Bears 52.0% of decks
Grizzly Bears 52.0% of decks
Watchwolf 57.4% of decks
Watchwolf 57.4% of decks
Gigantosaurus 56.8% of decks
Gigantosaurus 56.8% of decks
Muraganda Petroglyphs 54.1% of decks
Muraganda Petroglyphs 54.1% of decks
Rumbling Baloth 38.5% of decks
Rumbling Baloth 38.5% of decks
Leatherback Baloth 51.4% of decks
Leatherback Baloth 51.4% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (4)
- Jasmine Boreal of the Seven relevance 3.18 · 2.8% (118 of 4,199 decks)
- Jasmine Boreal relevance 1.49 · 11.4% (4 of 35 decks)
- Master Chef // Lulu, Loyal Hollyphant relevance 0.91 · 2.7% (3 of 111 decks)
- Sir Shandlar of Eberyn relevance 0.49 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Grizzly Bears relevance 2.54 · 52.0% (77 of 148 decks)
- Watchwolf relevance 2.21 · 57.4% (85 of 148 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 2.19 · 56.8% (84 of 148 decks)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 2.11 · 54.1% (80 of 148 decks)
- Rumbling Baloth relevance 2.11 · 38.5% (57 of 148 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 2.07 · 51.4% (76 of 148 decks)
- Savannah Lions relevance 1.95 · 49.3% (73 of 148 decks)
- Centaur Courser relevance 1.94 · 32.4% (48 of 148 decks)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 1.92 · 46.6% (69 of 148 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 1.84 · 43.9% (65 of 148 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 1.81 · 44.6% (66 of 148 decks)
- Nessian Courser relevance 1.80 · 27.0% (40 of 148 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 1.79 · 41.9% (62 of 148 decks)
- Craw Wurm relevance 1.76 · 26.4% (39 of 148 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 1.75 · 45.3% (67 of 148 decks)
- Isamaru, Hound of Konda relevance 1.67 · 41.9% (62 of 148 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 1.60 · 39.2% (58 of 148 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 1.60 · 37.2% (55 of 148 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 1.60 · 40.5% (60 of 148 decks)
- Elvish Warrior relevance 1.59 · 25.7% (38 of 148 decks)
- Elite Vanguard relevance 1.54 · 31.8% (47 of 148 decks)
- Panther Warriors relevance 1.46 · 26.4% (39 of 148 decks)
- Hollowhenge Beast relevance 1.44 · 21.6% (32 of 148 decks)
- Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 1.44 · 37.2% (55 of 148 decks)
- Enormous Baloth relevance 1.42 · 27.0% (40 of 148 decks)
- Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 1.41 · 31.1% (46 of 148 decks)
- Blade of the Sixth Pride relevance 1.37 · 29.1% (43 of 148 decks)
- Orazca Frillback relevance 1.32 · 29.7% (44 of 148 decks)
- Swordwise Centaur relevance 1.31 · 28.4% (42 of 148 decks)
- Runeclaw Bear relevance 1.31 · 24.3% (36 of 148 decks)
All creatures (46)
- Grizzly Bears relevance 2.54 · 52.0% (77 of 148 decks)
- Watchwolf relevance 2.21 · 57.4% (85 of 148 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 2.19 · 56.8% (84 of 148 decks)
- Rumbling Baloth relevance 2.11 · 38.5% (57 of 148 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 2.07 · 51.4% (76 of 148 decks)
- Savannah Lions relevance 1.95 · 49.3% (73 of 148 decks)
- Centaur Courser relevance 1.94 · 32.4% (48 of 148 decks)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 1.92 · 46.6% (69 of 148 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 1.84 · 43.9% (65 of 148 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 1.81 · 44.6% (66 of 148 decks)
- Nessian Courser relevance 1.80 · 27.0% (40 of 148 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 1.79 · 41.9% (62 of 148 decks)
- Craw Wurm relevance 1.76 · 26.4% (39 of 148 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 1.75 · 45.3% (67 of 148 decks)
- Isamaru, Hound of Konda relevance 1.67 · 41.9% (62 of 148 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 1.60 · 39.2% (58 of 148 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 1.60 · 37.2% (55 of 148 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 1.60 · 40.5% (60 of 148 decks)
- Elvish Warrior relevance 1.59 · 25.7% (38 of 148 decks)
- Elite Vanguard relevance 1.54 · 31.8% (47 of 148 decks)
- Panther Warriors relevance 1.46 · 26.4% (39 of 148 decks)
- Hollowhenge Beast relevance 1.44 · 21.6% (32 of 148 decks)
- Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 1.44 · 37.2% (55 of 148 decks)
- Enormous Baloth relevance 1.42 · 27.0% (40 of 148 decks)
- Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 1.41 · 31.1% (46 of 148 decks)
- Blade of the Sixth Pride relevance 1.37 · 29.1% (43 of 148 decks)
- Orazca Frillback relevance 1.32 · 29.7% (44 of 148 decks)
- Swordwise Centaur relevance 1.31 · 28.4% (42 of 148 decks)
- Runeclaw Bear relevance 1.31 · 24.3% (36 of 148 decks)
- Terrain Elemental relevance 1.30 · 29.7% (44 of 148 decks)
- Oreskos Swiftclaw relevance 1.28 · 26.4% (39 of 148 decks)
- Quilled Slagwurm relevance 1.22 · 26.4% (39 of 148 decks)
- Nyxborn Colossus relevance 1.20 · 23.0% (34 of 148 decks)
- Raptor Companion relevance 1.20 · 26.4% (39 of 148 decks)
- Elvish Ranger relevance 1.19 · 20.3% (30 of 148 decks)
- Jasmine Boreal relevance 1.14 · 20.9% (31 of 148 decks)
- Silvercoat Lion relevance 1.13 · 16.9% (25 of 148 decks)
- Colossapede relevance 1.09 · 20.3% (30 of 148 decks)
- Balduvian Bears relevance 1.09 · 19.6% (29 of 148 decks)
- Ferocious Zheng relevance 1.07 · 16.2% (24 of 148 decks)
- Devilthorn Fox relevance 1.06 · 23.6% (35 of 148 decks)
- Dromoka Warrior relevance 1.06 · 18.2% (27 of 148 decks)
- Sundial, Dawn Tyrant relevance 1.05 · 25.0% (37 of 148 decks)
- Grizzled Outrider relevance 1.04 · 17.6% (26 of 148 decks)
- Cheeky House-Mouse // Squeak By relevance 0.99 · 21.6% (32 of 148 decks)
- Armored Wolf-Rider relevance 0.97 · 17.6% (26 of 148 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 2.11 · 54.1% (80 of 148 decks)
- Glorious Anthem relevance 1.12 · 26.4% (39 of 148 decks)
- Gaea's Anthem relevance 1.07 · 25.0% (37 of 148 decks)
- Collective Blessing relevance 1.06 · 31.8% (47 of 148 decks)
EDH data for Trained Armodon: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 148 real decks.



















