Horrific Assault
Played in 164 Selesnya decks
Color Identity Spread
3.3% Selesnya
All commanders (2)
- Noble Heritage // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 1.02 · 1.0% (8 of 781 decks)
- Haliya, Ascendant Cadet relevance 0.79 · 1.2% (4 of 337 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Hard-Hitting Question relevance 1.15 · 17.1% (28 of 164 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.84 · 22.6% (37 of 164 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.71 · 14.0% (23 of 164 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.58 · 15.2% (25 of 164 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.58 · 18.3% (30 of 164 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.53 · 29.9% (49 of 164 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.53 · 40.2% (66 of 164 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.53 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.52 · 20.1% (33 of 164 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.47 · 15.2% (25 of 164 decks)
- Requisition Raid relevance 0.46 · 17.1% (28 of 164 decks)
- Nightshade Dryad relevance 0.46 · 9.1% (15 of 164 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.45 · 14.0% (23 of 164 decks)
- Thraben Charm relevance 0.44 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.42 · 22.6% (37 of 164 decks)
- Primal Might relevance 0.42 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.42 · 11.6% (19 of 164 decks)
- Take Up the Shield relevance 0.41 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- Wildwood Scourge relevance 0.41 · 11.6% (19 of 164 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.41 · 20.1% (33 of 164 decks)
- Trash the Town relevance 0.41 · 8.5% (14 of 164 decks)
- Master's Rebuke relevance 0.41 · 6.1% (10 of 164 decks)
- Super Combo relevance 0.41 · 6.1% (10 of 164 decks)
- Kutzil, Malamet Exemplar relevance 0.41 · 32.3% (53 of 164 decks)
- Cosmic Hunger relevance 0.40 · 6.1% (10 of 164 decks)
- Lion Umbra relevance 0.40 · 10.4% (17 of 164 decks)
- Pridemalkin relevance 0.39 · 11.6% (19 of 164 decks)
- Enlarge relevance 0.38 · 6.1% (10 of 164 decks)
- Basking Broodscale relevance 0.38 · 11.6% (19 of 164 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 0.38 · 10.4% (17 of 164 decks)
All creatures (8)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.47 · 15.2% (25 of 164 decks)
- Nightshade Dryad relevance 0.46 · 9.1% (15 of 164 decks)
- Wildwood Scourge relevance 0.41 · 11.6% (19 of 164 decks)
- Kutzil, Malamet Exemplar relevance 0.41 · 32.3% (53 of 164 decks)
- Pridemalkin relevance 0.39 · 11.6% (19 of 164 decks)
- Basking Broodscale relevance 0.38 · 11.6% (19 of 164 decks)
- Undergrowth Leopard relevance 0.38 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
- Mikaeus, the Lunarch relevance 0.36 · 13.4% (22 of 164 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.36 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.53 · 29.9% (49 of 164 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.42 · 22.6% (37 of 164 decks)
- Lion Umbra relevance 0.40 · 10.4% (17 of 164 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.36 · 18.9% (31 of 164 decks)
All instants (14)
- Ram Through relevance 0.84 · 22.6% (37 of 164 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.71 · 14.0% (23 of 164 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.58 · 18.3% (30 of 164 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.52 · 20.1% (33 of 164 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.45 · 14.0% (23 of 164 decks)
- Thraben Charm relevance 0.44 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.42 · 11.6% (19 of 164 decks)
- Take Up the Shield relevance 0.41 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- Trash the Town relevance 0.41 · 8.5% (14 of 164 decks)
- Master's Rebuke relevance 0.41 · 6.1% (10 of 164 decks)
- Cosmic Hunger relevance 0.40 · 6.1% (10 of 164 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 0.38 · 10.4% (17 of 164 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.37 · 9.1% (15 of 164 decks)
- Tail Swipe relevance 0.37 · 7.3% (12 of 164 decks)
All sorceries (11)
- Hard-Hitting Question relevance 1.15 · 17.1% (28 of 164 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.58 · 15.2% (25 of 164 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.53 · 40.2% (66 of 164 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.53 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- Requisition Raid relevance 0.46 · 17.1% (28 of 164 decks)
- Primal Might relevance 0.42 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.41 · 20.1% (33 of 164 decks)
- Super Combo relevance 0.41 · 6.1% (10 of 164 decks)
- Enlarge relevance 0.38 · 6.1% (10 of 164 decks)
- Wear Down relevance 0.37 · 8.5% (14 of 164 decks)
- Pick Your Poison relevance 0.36 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
All utility lands (5)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.42 · 18.3% (30 of 164 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.38 · 10.4% (17 of 164 decks)
- The Hunter Maze relevance 0.38 · 6.7% (11 of 164 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.36 · 12.8% (21 of 164 decks)
- Botanical Plaza relevance 0.36 · 9.8% (16 of 164 decks)
All lands (7)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.55 · 36.0% (59 of 164 decks)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 0.55 · 18.9% (31 of 164 decks)
- Radiant Grove relevance 0.49 · 20.1% (33 of 164 decks)
- Razorverge Thicket relevance 0.39 · 22.6% (37 of 164 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.38 · 21.3% (35 of 164 decks)
- Etched Cornfield relevance 0.37 · 8.5% (14 of 164 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.36 · 9.1% (15 of 164 decks)
EDH data for Horrific Assault: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 164 real decks.