Dissipate
Played in 400 Sultai decks
Color Identity Spread
228+8+3+1+12+4+8+14+
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.39 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.25 · 1.0% (1 of 97 decks)
All most relevant (28)
- Dissolve relevance 0.68 · 10.3% (41 of 400 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.67 · 14.5% (58 of 400 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.61 · 12.8% (51 of 400 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.56 · 29.0% (116 of 400 decks)
- Putrefy relevance 0.53 · 33.5% (134 of 400 decks)
- Sultai Charm relevance 0.49 · 14.8% (59 of 400 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.47 · 29.5% (118 of 400 decks)
- Diabolic Tutor relevance 0.47 · 13.5% (54 of 400 decks)
- Voracious Tome-Skimmer relevance 0.43 · 14.2% (57 of 400 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.41 · 23.0% (92 of 400 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.41 · 28.0% (112 of 400 decks)
- Glamermite relevance 0.40 · 10.3% (41 of 400 decks)
- Treasured Find relevance 0.40 · 7.0% (28 of 400 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.39 · 8.5% (34 of 400 decks)
- Voidslime relevance 0.38 · 9.8% (39 of 400 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.38 · 8.5% (34 of 400 decks)
- Virulent Emissary relevance 0.36 · 11.3% (45 of 400 decks)
- Villainous Wealth relevance 0.36 · 16.8% (67 of 400 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.35 · 19.8% (79 of 400 decks)
- Bitterbloom Bearer relevance 0.35 · 13.3% (53 of 400 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.35 · 9.0% (36 of 400 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.35 · 6.8% (27 of 400 decks)
- Bitterblossom relevance 0.34 · 12.5% (50 of 400 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.33 · 15.0% (60 of 400 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.33 · 9.0% (36 of 400 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.33 · 9.0% (36 of 400 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.32 · 10.3% (41 of 400 decks)
- Oona, Queen of the Fae relevance 0.30 · 9.8% (39 of 400 decks)
All creatures (8)
- Voracious Tome-Skimmer relevance 0.43 · 14.2% (57 of 400 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.41 · 28.0% (112 of 400 decks)
- Glamermite relevance 0.40 · 10.3% (41 of 400 decks)
- Virulent Emissary relevance 0.36 · 11.3% (45 of 400 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.35 · 19.8% (79 of 400 decks)
- Bitterbloom Bearer relevance 0.35 · 13.3% (53 of 400 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.33 · 15.0% (60 of 400 decks)
- Oona, Queen of the Fae relevance 0.30 · 9.8% (39 of 400 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.47 · 29.5% (118 of 400 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.33 · 9.0% (36 of 400 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.32 · 10.3% (41 of 400 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Bitterblossom relevance 0.34 · 12.5% (50 of 400 decks)
All instants (12)
- Dissolve relevance 0.68 · 10.3% (41 of 400 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.67 · 14.5% (58 of 400 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.61 · 12.8% (51 of 400 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.56 · 29.0% (116 of 400 decks)
- Putrefy relevance 0.53 · 33.5% (134 of 400 decks)
- Sultai Charm relevance 0.49 · 14.8% (59 of 400 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.39 · 8.5% (34 of 400 decks)
- Voidslime relevance 0.38 · 9.8% (39 of 400 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.38 · 8.5% (34 of 400 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.35 · 9.0% (36 of 400 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.35 · 6.8% (27 of 400 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.33 · 9.0% (36 of 400 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Diabolic Tutor relevance 0.47 · 13.5% (54 of 400 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.41 · 23.0% (92 of 400 decks)
- Treasured Find relevance 0.40 · 7.0% (28 of 400 decks)
- Villainous Wealth relevance 0.36 · 16.8% (67 of 400 decks)
All utility lands (8)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.52 · 25.3% (101 of 400 decks)
- Temple of Deceit relevance 0.48 · 21.8% (87 of 400 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.44 · 28.2% (113 of 400 decks)
- Temple of Malady relevance 0.41 · 22.8% (91 of 400 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.37 · 26.0% (104 of 400 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.35 · 17.5% (70 of 400 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.34 · 15.8% (63 of 400 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.31 · 7.8% (31 of 400 decks)
All lands (14)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.64 · 44.5% (178 of 400 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.49 · 32.0% (128 of 400 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.47 · 23.0% (92 of 400 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.43 · 15.0% (60 of 400 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.41 · 14.2% (57 of 400 decks)
- Jungle Hollow relevance 0.40 · 14.0% (56 of 400 decks)
- Dismal Backwater relevance 0.37 · 12.3% (49 of 400 decks)
- Twilight Mire relevance 0.36 · 16.0% (64 of 400 decks)
- Necroblossom Snarl relevance 0.35 · 11.0% (44 of 400 decks)
- Golgari Rot Farm relevance 0.34 · 19.8% (79 of 400 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.34 · 10.0% (40 of 400 decks)
- Choked Estuary relevance 0.34 · 11.3% (45 of 400 decks)
- Dimir Aqueduct relevance 0.33 · 15.3% (61 of 400 decks)
- Golgari Guildgate relevance 0.30 · 9.0% (36 of 400 decks)
EDH data for Dissipate: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 400 real decks.





















































