Panglacial Wurm
Played in 98 Jund decks
Color Identity Spread
2.4% Jund
30+21+4+3+5+4+1+7+5+
All most relevant (30)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 1.36 · 27.6% (27 of 98 decks)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 1.06 · 21.4% (21 of 98 decks)
- Wurmcoil Engine relevance 0.81 · 17.3% (17 of 98 decks)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 0.80 · 12.2% (12 of 98 decks)
- Charnelhoard Wurm relevance 0.76 · 14.3% (14 of 98 decks)
- Quilled Greatwurm relevance 0.75 · 13.3% (13 of 98 decks)
- Defiler of Vigor relevance 0.75 · 12.2% (12 of 98 decks)
- Emergent Woodwurm relevance 0.75 · 13.3% (13 of 98 decks)
- Balustrade Wurm relevance 0.68 · 10.2% (10 of 98 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 0.66 · 11.2% (11 of 98 decks)
- Grothama, All-Devouring relevance 0.66 · 11.2% (11 of 98 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.59 · 13.3% (13 of 98 decks)
- Massacre Wurm relevance 0.57 · 20.4% (20 of 98 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.53 · 28.6% (28 of 98 decks)
- Fling relevance 0.49 · 16.3% (16 of 98 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.49 · 9.2% (9 of 98 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.49 · 25.5% (25 of 98 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.44 · 30.6% (30 of 98 decks)
- Yargle and Multani relevance 0.41 · 13.3% (13 of 98 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.40 · 15.3% (15 of 98 decks)
- Seething Song relevance 0.40 · 8.2% (8 of 98 decks)
- Ouroboroid relevance 0.39 · 10.2% (10 of 98 decks)
- Victimize relevance 0.38 · 21.4% (21 of 98 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.38 · 17.3% (17 of 98 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.37 · 13.3% (13 of 98 decks)
- Jumbo Cactuar relevance 0.36 · 9.2% (9 of 98 decks)
- Ghalta, Stampede Tyrant relevance 0.35 · 9.2% (9 of 98 decks)
- Junji, the Midnight Sky relevance 0.35 · 15.3% (15 of 98 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.35 · 22.4% (22 of 98 decks)
- Chaos Warp relevance 0.35 · 19.4% (19 of 98 decks)
All creatures (21)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 1.36 · 27.6% (27 of 98 decks)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 1.06 · 21.4% (21 of 98 decks)
- Wurmcoil Engine relevance 0.81 · 17.3% (17 of 98 decks)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 0.80 · 12.2% (12 of 98 decks)
- Charnelhoard Wurm relevance 0.76 · 14.3% (14 of 98 decks)
- Quilled Greatwurm relevance 0.75 · 13.3% (13 of 98 decks)
- Defiler of Vigor relevance 0.75 · 12.2% (12 of 98 decks)
- Emergent Woodwurm relevance 0.75 · 13.3% (13 of 98 decks)
- Balustrade Wurm relevance 0.68 · 10.2% (10 of 98 decks)
- Grothama, All-Devouring relevance 0.66 · 11.2% (11 of 98 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.59 · 13.3% (13 of 98 decks)
- Massacre Wurm relevance 0.57 · 20.4% (20 of 98 decks)
- Yargle and Multani relevance 0.41 · 13.3% (13 of 98 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.40 · 15.3% (15 of 98 decks)
- Ouroboroid relevance 0.39 · 10.2% (10 of 98 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.37 · 13.3% (13 of 98 decks)
- Jumbo Cactuar relevance 0.36 · 9.2% (9 of 98 decks)
- Ghalta, Stampede Tyrant relevance 0.35 · 9.2% (9 of 98 decks)
- Junji, the Midnight Sky relevance 0.35 · 15.3% (15 of 98 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.34 · 14.3% (14 of 98 decks)
- Daemogoth Titan relevance 0.32 · 8.2% (8 of 98 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Gruul Signet relevance 0.33 · 11.2% (11 of 98 decks)
- Golgari Signet relevance 0.32 · 11.2% (11 of 98 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.32 · 18.4% (18 of 98 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.31 · 17.3% (17 of 98 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 0.66 · 11.2% (11 of 98 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.49 · 25.5% (25 of 98 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.38 · 17.3% (17 of 98 decks)
All instants (5)
- Fling relevance 0.49 · 16.3% (16 of 98 decks)
- Seething Song relevance 0.40 · 8.2% (8 of 98 decks)
- Chaos Warp relevance 0.35 · 19.4% (19 of 98 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.34 · 11.2% (11 of 98 decks)
- Saw in Half relevance 0.31 · 10.2% (10 of 98 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.53 · 28.6% (28 of 98 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.44 · 30.6% (30 of 98 decks)
- Victimize relevance 0.38 · 21.4% (21 of 98 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.35 · 22.4% (22 of 98 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.49 · 9.2% (9 of 98 decks)
All utility lands (7)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.42 · 22.4% (22 of 98 decks)
- Twisted Landscape relevance 0.40 · 22.4% (22 of 98 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.40 · 21.4% (21 of 98 decks)
- Kessig Wolf Run relevance 0.40 · 19.4% (19 of 98 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.39 · 13.3% (13 of 98 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.34 · 19.4% (19 of 98 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.32 · 14.3% (14 of 98 decks)
All lands (5)
- Snow-Covered Swamp relevance 0.43 · 12.2% (12 of 98 decks)
- Snow-Covered Mountain relevance 0.36 · 10.2% (10 of 98 decks)
- Rockfall Vale relevance 0.36 · 20.4% (20 of 98 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.35 · 10.2% (10 of 98 decks)
- Jungle Hollow relevance 0.35 · 10.2% (10 of 98 decks)
EDH data for Panglacial Wurm: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 98 real decks.

















































