Chorus of the Tides
Played in 157 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
157 decks
Commanders
6
Commanders
6All commanders (6)
- Maeve, Insidious Singer relevance 1.57 · 2.3% (5 of 214 decks)
- Falthis, Shadowcat Familiar // Siani, Eye of the Storm relevance 1.37 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
- Eligeth, Crossroads Augur // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 1.11 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Tavern Brawler // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.82 · 1.9% (1 of 53 decks)
- Teo, Spirited Glider relevance 0.70 · 4.5% (1 of 22 decks)
- Inga Rune-Eyes relevance 0.58 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
Parallel Cards
3
Parallel Cards
All parallel cards (3)
Most Relevant
30
Most Relevant
30All most relevant (30)
- War-Wing Siren relevance 3.28 · 32.5% (51 of 157 decks)
- Cloaked Siren relevance 3.24 · 31.2% (49 of 157 decks)
- Battlewise Hoplite relevance 2.70 · 28.7% (45 of 157 decks)
- Chain to Memory relevance 2.42 · 28.0% (44 of 157 decks)
- Alluring Siren relevance 2.39 · 28.0% (44 of 157 decks)
- Artisan of Forms relevance 2.31 · 28.7% (45 of 157 decks)
- Callous Deceiver relevance 2.29 · 21.0% (33 of 157 decks)
- Celestial Messenger relevance 2.22 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
- Battlefield Thaumaturge relevance 2.20 · 29.3% (46 of 157 decks)
- Cephalid Shrine relevance 2.20 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
- Calculated Dismissal relevance 2.19 · 28.0% (44 of 157 decks)
- Cascade Seer relevance 2.18 · 23.6% (37 of 157 decks)
- Chasm Drake relevance 2.17 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
- Cloudheath Drake relevance 2.16 · 19.1% (30 of 157 decks)
- Cephalid Snitch relevance 2.16 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
- Champion's Drake relevance 2.15 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
- Cerulean Wyvern relevance 2.14 · 19.7% (31 of 157 decks)
- Cerulean Sphinx relevance 2.14 · 21.0% (33 of 157 decks)
- Captivating Gyre relevance 2.11 · 21.7% (34 of 157 decks)
- Chant of the Skifsang relevance 2.11 · 21.7% (34 of 157 decks)
- Blizzard Elemental relevance 2.10 · 19.1% (30 of 157 decks)
- Aerial Formation relevance 2.10 · 23.6% (37 of 157 decks)
- Blockade Runner relevance 2.09 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
- Browse relevance 2.09 · 19.7% (31 of 157 decks)
- Breezekeeper relevance 2.08 · 19.1% (30 of 157 decks)
- Chronostutter relevance 2.08 · 19.7% (31 of 157 decks)
- Benthic Giant relevance 2.06 · 21.0% (33 of 157 decks)
- Brine Hag relevance 2.06 · 18.5% (29 of 157 decks)
- Cache Raiders relevance 2.06 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
- Advanced Hoverguard relevance 2.05 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
Creatures
41
Creatures
41 All creatures (41)
- War-Wing Siren relevance 3.28 · 32.5% (51 of 157 decks)
- Cloaked Siren relevance 3.24 · 31.2% (49 of 157 decks)
- Battlewise Hoplite relevance 2.70 · 28.7% (45 of 157 decks)
- Alluring Siren relevance 2.39 · 28.0% (44 of 157 decks)
- Artisan of Forms relevance 2.31 · 28.7% (45 of 157 decks)
- Callous Deceiver relevance 2.29 · 21.0% (33 of 157 decks)
- Celestial Messenger relevance 2.22 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
- Battlefield Thaumaturge relevance 2.20 · 29.3% (46 of 157 decks)
- Cascade Seer relevance 2.18 · 23.6% (37 of 157 decks)
- Chasm Drake relevance 2.17 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
- Cloudheath Drake relevance 2.16 · 19.1% (30 of 157 decks)
- Cephalid Snitch relevance 2.16 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
- Champion's Drake relevance 2.15 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
- Cerulean Wyvern relevance 2.14 · 19.7% (31 of 157 decks)
- Cerulean Sphinx relevance 2.14 · 21.0% (33 of 157 decks)
- Blizzard Elemental relevance 2.10 · 19.1% (30 of 157 decks)
- Blockade Runner relevance 2.09 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
- Breezekeeper relevance 2.08 · 19.1% (30 of 157 decks)
- Benthic Giant relevance 2.06 · 21.0% (33 of 157 decks)
- Brine Hag relevance 2.06 · 18.5% (29 of 157 decks)
- Cache Raiders relevance 2.06 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
- Advanced Hoverguard relevance 2.05 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
- Cloudreader Sphinx relevance 2.05 · 22.9% (36 of 157 decks)
- Cephalid Aristocrat relevance 2.05 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
- Cloud Elemental relevance 2.05 · 19.1% (30 of 157 decks)
- Balshan Beguiler relevance 2.04 · 19.1% (30 of 157 decks)
- Balshan Griffin relevance 2.04 · 17.8% (28 of 157 decks)
- Cloudskate relevance 2.04 · 18.5% (29 of 157 decks)
- Cephalid Retainer relevance 2.03 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
- Cephalid Scout relevance 2.02 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
- Celestus Sanctifier relevance 2.02 · 19.1% (30 of 157 decks)
- Blind Phantasm relevance 2.02 · 19.1% (30 of 157 decks)
- Citywatch Sphinx relevance 2.01 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
- Clinging Anemones relevance 2.00 · 21.7% (34 of 157 decks)
- Boreal Elemental relevance 2.00 · 19.7% (31 of 157 decks)
- Cloudsculpt Technician relevance 2.00 · 21.7% (34 of 157 decks)
- Capashen Templar relevance 2.00 · 17.2% (27 of 157 decks)
- Coastline Chimera relevance 2.00 · 18.5% (29 of 157 decks)
- Coastal Hornclaw relevance 2.00 · 17.8% (28 of 157 decks)
- Bubbling Beebles relevance 2.00 · 19.1% (30 of 157 decks)
- Cloud Manta relevance 2.00 · 19.7% (31 of 157 decks)
Enchantments
3
Enchantments
3 All enchantments (3)
- Cephalid Shrine relevance 2.20 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
- Chant of the Skifsang relevance 2.11 · 21.7% (34 of 157 decks)
- Browse relevance 2.09 · 19.7% (31 of 157 decks)
Instants
4
Instants
4 All instants (4)
- Chain to Memory relevance 2.42 · 28.0% (44 of 157 decks)
- Calculated Dismissal relevance 2.19 · 28.0% (44 of 157 decks)
- Aerial Formation relevance 2.10 · 23.6% (37 of 157 decks)
- Chronostutter relevance 2.08 · 19.7% (31 of 157 decks)
Sorceries
2
Sorceries
2 All sorceries (2)
- Captivating Gyre relevance 2.11 · 21.7% (34 of 157 decks)
- Churning Eddy relevance 2.02 · 19.7% (31 of 157 decks)
EDH data for Chorus of the Tides: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 157 real decks.






























































