Chorus of the Tides

Played in 157 decks

Chorus of the Tides
$0.09 €0.05

Change per day

Commanders

6

Showing 1-6 of 6

Page size
All commanders (6)
  1. Maeve, Insidious Singer relevance 1.57 · 2.3% (5 of 214 decks)
  2. Falthis, Shadowcat Familiar // Siani, Eye of the Storm relevance 1.37 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
  3. Eligeth, Crossroads Augur // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 1.11 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
  4. Tavern Brawler // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.82 · 1.9% (1 of 53 decks)
  5. Teo, Spirited Glider relevance 0.70 · 4.5% (1 of 22 decks)
  6. Inga Rune-Eyes relevance 0.58 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)

Parallel Cards

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
All parallel cards (3)
  1. Prescient Chimera
  2. Artificer's Assistant
  3. Merfolk Falconer

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • War-Wing Siren
    3.28 32.5%
    $0.06 €0.09
  • Cloaked Siren
    3.24 31.2%
    $0.02 €0.10
  • Battlewise Hoplite
    2.70 28.7%
    $0.06 €0.09
  • Chain to Memory
    2.42 28.0%
    $0.14 €0.10
  • Alluring Siren
    2.39 28.0%
    $0.08 €0.13
  • Artisan of Forms
    2.31 28.7%
    $0.20 €0.32
  • Callous Deceiver
    2.29 21.0%
    $0.09 €0.07
  • Celestial Messenger
    2.22 20.4%
    $0.10 €0.20
  • Battlefield Thaumaturge
    2.20 29.3%
    $0.26 €0.30
  • Cephalid Shrine
    2.20 20.4%
    $0.35 €0.29
All most relevant (30)
  1. War-Wing Siren relevance 3.28 · 32.5% (51 of 157 decks)
  2. Cloaked Siren relevance 3.24 · 31.2% (49 of 157 decks)
  3. Battlewise Hoplite relevance 2.70 · 28.7% (45 of 157 decks)
  4. Chain to Memory relevance 2.42 · 28.0% (44 of 157 decks)
  5. Alluring Siren relevance 2.39 · 28.0% (44 of 157 decks)
  6. Artisan of Forms relevance 2.31 · 28.7% (45 of 157 decks)
  7. Callous Deceiver relevance 2.29 · 21.0% (33 of 157 decks)
  8. Celestial Messenger relevance 2.22 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
  9. Battlefield Thaumaturge relevance 2.20 · 29.3% (46 of 157 decks)
  10. Cephalid Shrine relevance 2.20 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
  11. Calculated Dismissal relevance 2.19 · 28.0% (44 of 157 decks)
  12. Cascade Seer relevance 2.18 · 23.6% (37 of 157 decks)
  13. Chasm Drake relevance 2.17 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
  14. Cloudheath Drake relevance 2.16 · 19.1% (30 of 157 decks)
  15. Cephalid Snitch relevance 2.16 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
  16. Champion's Drake relevance 2.15 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
  17. Cerulean Wyvern relevance 2.14 · 19.7% (31 of 157 decks)
  18. Cerulean Sphinx relevance 2.14 · 21.0% (33 of 157 decks)
  19. Captivating Gyre relevance 2.11 · 21.7% (34 of 157 decks)
  20. Chant of the Skifsang relevance 2.11 · 21.7% (34 of 157 decks)
  21. Blizzard Elemental relevance 2.10 · 19.1% (30 of 157 decks)
  22. Aerial Formation relevance 2.10 · 23.6% (37 of 157 decks)
  23. Blockade Runner relevance 2.09 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
  24. Browse relevance 2.09 · 19.7% (31 of 157 decks)
  25. Breezekeeper relevance 2.08 · 19.1% (30 of 157 decks)
  26. Chronostutter relevance 2.08 · 19.7% (31 of 157 decks)
  27. Benthic Giant relevance 2.06 · 21.0% (33 of 157 decks)
  28. Brine Hag relevance 2.06 · 18.5% (29 of 157 decks)
  29. Cache Raiders relevance 2.06 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
  30. Advanced Hoverguard relevance 2.05 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)

Creatures

41

Showing 1-10 of 41

Page size
  • War-Wing Siren
    3.28 32.5%
    $0.06 €0.09
  • Cloaked Siren
    3.24 31.2%
    $0.02 €0.10
  • Battlewise Hoplite
    2.70 28.7%
    $0.06 €0.09
  • Alluring Siren
    2.39 28.0%
    $0.08 €0.13
  • Artisan of Forms
    2.31 28.7%
    $0.20 €0.32
  • Callous Deceiver
    2.29 21.0%
    $0.09 €0.07
  • Celestial Messenger
    2.22 20.4%
    $0.10 €0.20
  • Battlefield Thaumaturge
    2.20 29.3%
    $0.26 €0.30
  • Cascade Seer
    2.18 23.6%
    $0.11 €0.04
  • Chasm Drake
    2.17 20.4%
    $0.08 €0.08
All creatures (41)
  1. War-Wing Siren relevance 3.28 · 32.5% (51 of 157 decks)
  2. Cloaked Siren relevance 3.24 · 31.2% (49 of 157 decks)
  3. Battlewise Hoplite relevance 2.70 · 28.7% (45 of 157 decks)
  4. Alluring Siren relevance 2.39 · 28.0% (44 of 157 decks)
  5. Artisan of Forms relevance 2.31 · 28.7% (45 of 157 decks)
  6. Callous Deceiver relevance 2.29 · 21.0% (33 of 157 decks)
  7. Celestial Messenger relevance 2.22 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
  8. Battlefield Thaumaturge relevance 2.20 · 29.3% (46 of 157 decks)
  9. Cascade Seer relevance 2.18 · 23.6% (37 of 157 decks)
  10. Chasm Drake relevance 2.17 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
  11. Cloudheath Drake relevance 2.16 · 19.1% (30 of 157 decks)
  12. Cephalid Snitch relevance 2.16 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
  13. Champion's Drake relevance 2.15 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
  14. Cerulean Wyvern relevance 2.14 · 19.7% (31 of 157 decks)
  15. Cerulean Sphinx relevance 2.14 · 21.0% (33 of 157 decks)
  16. Blizzard Elemental relevance 2.10 · 19.1% (30 of 157 decks)
  17. Blockade Runner relevance 2.09 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
  18. Breezekeeper relevance 2.08 · 19.1% (30 of 157 decks)
  19. Benthic Giant relevance 2.06 · 21.0% (33 of 157 decks)
  20. Brine Hag relevance 2.06 · 18.5% (29 of 157 decks)
  21. Cache Raiders relevance 2.06 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
  22. Advanced Hoverguard relevance 2.05 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
  23. Cloudreader Sphinx relevance 2.05 · 22.9% (36 of 157 decks)
  24. Cephalid Aristocrat relevance 2.05 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
  25. Cloud Elemental relevance 2.05 · 19.1% (30 of 157 decks)
  26. Balshan Beguiler relevance 2.04 · 19.1% (30 of 157 decks)
  27. Balshan Griffin relevance 2.04 · 17.8% (28 of 157 decks)
  28. Cloudskate relevance 2.04 · 18.5% (29 of 157 decks)
  29. Cephalid Retainer relevance 2.03 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
  30. Cephalid Scout relevance 2.02 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
  31. Celestus Sanctifier relevance 2.02 · 19.1% (30 of 157 decks)
  32. Blind Phantasm relevance 2.02 · 19.1% (30 of 157 decks)
  33. Citywatch Sphinx relevance 2.01 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
  34. Clinging Anemones relevance 2.00 · 21.7% (34 of 157 decks)
  35. Boreal Elemental relevance 2.00 · 19.7% (31 of 157 decks)
  36. Cloudsculpt Technician relevance 2.00 · 21.7% (34 of 157 decks)
  37. Capashen Templar relevance 2.00 · 17.2% (27 of 157 decks)
  38. Coastline Chimera relevance 2.00 · 18.5% (29 of 157 decks)
  39. Coastal Hornclaw relevance 2.00 · 17.8% (28 of 157 decks)
  40. Bubbling Beebles relevance 2.00 · 19.1% (30 of 157 decks)
  41. Cloud Manta relevance 2.00 · 19.7% (31 of 157 decks)

Enchantments

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Cephalid Shrine
    2.20 20.4%
    $0.35 €0.29
  • Chant of the Skifsang
    2.11 21.7%
    $0.13 €0.10
  • Browse
    2.09 19.7%
    $0.19 €0.17
All enchantments (3)
  1. Cephalid Shrine relevance 2.20 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
  2. Chant of the Skifsang relevance 2.11 · 21.7% (34 of 157 decks)
  3. Browse relevance 2.09 · 19.7% (31 of 157 decks)

Instants

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Chain to Memory
    2.42 28.0%
    $0.14 €0.10
  • Calculated Dismissal
    2.19 28.0%
    $0.17 €0.11
  • Aerial Formation
    2.10 23.6%
    $0.09 €0.09
  • Chronostutter
    2.08 19.7%
    $0.13 €0.08
All instants (4)
  1. Chain to Memory relevance 2.42 · 28.0% (44 of 157 decks)
  2. Calculated Dismissal relevance 2.19 · 28.0% (44 of 157 decks)
  3. Aerial Formation relevance 2.10 · 23.6% (37 of 157 decks)
  4. Chronostutter relevance 2.08 · 19.7% (31 of 157 decks)

Sorceries

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Captivating Gyre
    2.11 21.7%
    $0.09 €0.02
  • Churning Eddy
    2.02 19.7%
    $0.17 €0.05
All sorceries (2)
  1. Captivating Gyre relevance 2.11 · 21.7% (34 of 157 decks)
  2. Churning Eddy relevance 2.02 · 19.7% (31 of 157 decks)

EDH data for Chorus of the Tides: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 157 real decks.