Thundering Tanadon
Played in 52 Gruul decks
Color Identity Spread
16.9% Gruul
230+42+1+3+1+3+
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Guild Artisan // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.52 · 1.4% (1 of 71 decks)
- Kraven, Proud Predator relevance 0.49 · 1.1% (1 of 93 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Ulamog's Crusher relevance 1.35 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Molten Monstrosity relevance 1.31 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Woodland Liege relevance 1.28 · 28.8% (15 of 52 decks)
- Chancellor of the Tangle relevance 1.24 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Spitebellows relevance 1.18 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Wirewood Savage relevance 1.12 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 1.08 · 34.6% (18 of 52 decks)
- Lashwhip Predator relevance 1.07 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 1.02 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Frenzied Arynx relevance 1.01 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Cragplate Baloth relevance 1.01 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Krosan Warchief relevance 0.99 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.97 · 40.4% (21 of 52 decks)
- Valley Rannet relevance 0.97 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Maelstrom Colossus relevance 0.93 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Timberland Ancient relevance 0.92 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Garruk's Horde relevance 0.91 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Oliphaunt relevance 0.88 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Spearbreaker Behemoth relevance 0.86 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Colossal Dreadmaw relevance 0.86 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Spellbreaker Behemoth relevance 0.85 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Territorial Bruntar relevance 0.82 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Caller of the Pack relevance 0.81 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Slavering Branchsnapper relevance 0.80 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Boarding Party relevance 0.77 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.74 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Herd Baloth relevance 0.74 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Nylea's Forerunner relevance 0.71 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.70 · 30.8% (16 of 52 decks)
- Paleoloth relevance 0.69 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
All creatures (42)
- Ulamog's Crusher relevance 1.35 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Molten Monstrosity relevance 1.31 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Woodland Liege relevance 1.28 · 28.8% (15 of 52 decks)
- Chancellor of the Tangle relevance 1.24 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Spitebellows relevance 1.18 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Wirewood Savage relevance 1.12 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 1.08 · 34.6% (18 of 52 decks)
- Lashwhip Predator relevance 1.07 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 1.02 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Frenzied Arynx relevance 1.01 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Cragplate Baloth relevance 1.01 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Krosan Warchief relevance 0.99 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.97 · 40.4% (21 of 52 decks)
- Valley Rannet relevance 0.97 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Maelstrom Colossus relevance 0.93 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Timberland Ancient relevance 0.92 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Garruk's Horde relevance 0.91 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Oliphaunt relevance 0.88 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Spearbreaker Behemoth relevance 0.86 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Colossal Dreadmaw relevance 0.86 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Spellbreaker Behemoth relevance 0.85 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Territorial Bruntar relevance 0.82 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Caller of the Pack relevance 0.81 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Slavering Branchsnapper relevance 0.80 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Boarding Party relevance 0.77 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.74 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Herd Baloth relevance 0.74 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Nylea's Forerunner relevance 0.71 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.70 · 30.8% (16 of 52 decks)
- Paleoloth relevance 0.69 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Gladiolus Amicitia relevance 0.68 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Gruul Ragebeast relevance 0.65 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Pyrewood Gearhulk relevance 0.64 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Siege Behemoth relevance 0.63 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 0.63 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Combustible Gearhulk relevance 0.60 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 0.59 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Kona, Rescue Beastie relevance 0.57 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Frenzied Baloth relevance 0.55 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.54 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.52 · 34.6% (18 of 52 decks)
- Vigor relevance 0.49 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.50 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.61 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.53 · 28.8% (15 of 52 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.50 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.60 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
All lands (3)
- Wooded Ridgeline relevance 0.61 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Gruul Guildgate relevance 0.55 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.53 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
EDH data for Thundering Tanadon: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 52 real decks.































