Color Identity Spread
10.5% Grixis
3030+16+4+3+15+5+1+6+
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- Inalla, Archmage Ritualist relevance 4.36 · 45.7% (4,067 of 8,890 decks)
- Kess, Dissident Mage relevance 1.87 · 11.5% (543 of 4,723 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Krark, the Thumbless relevance 1.30 · 13.8% (54 of 392 decks)
- Obeka, Brute Chronologist relevance 1.28 · 6.7% (331 of 4,925 decks)
- Kefka, Court Mage // Kefka, Ruler of Ruin relevance 1.24 · 4.8% (1,023 of 21,369 decks)
- Fire Lord Azula relevance 0.95 · 3.2% (1,024 of 31,969 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Dargo, the Shipwrecker relevance 0.91 · 9.2% (30 of 327 decks)
- Cormela, Glamour Thief relevance 0.89 · 5.0% (119 of 2,370 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator relevance 0.62 · 3.8% (55 of 1,450 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh relevance 0.55 · 2.3% (162 of 7,018 decks)
- Kraum, Ludevic's Opus // Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools relevance 0.52 · 6.1% (11 of 179 decks)
- Marchesa, the Black Rose relevance 0.51 · 2.1% (165 of 7,859 decks)
- Nicol Bolas, the Ravager // Nicol Bolas, the Arisen relevance 0.49 · 2.2% (119 of 5,422 decks)
- Lord of Tresserhorn relevance 0.36 · 2.8% (17 of 603 decks)
- Gwendlyn Di Corci relevance 0.35 · 4.1% (8 of 196 decks)
- Mairsil, the Pretender relevance 0.34 · 2.1% (27 of 1,262 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist relevance 0.34 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Zevlor, Elturel Exile relevance 0.33 · 1.8% (43 of 2,445 decks)
- Norman Osborn // Green Goblin relevance 0.30 · 1.1% (146 of 12,955 decks)
- Francisco, Fowl Marauder // Kraum, Ludevic's Opus relevance 0.28 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Cecily, Haunted Mage // Bjorna, Nightfall Alchemist relevance 0.26 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Kraum, Ludevic's Opus relevance 0.26 · 7.4% (2 of 27 decks)
- Marchesa, Dealer of Death relevance 0.21 · 1.1% (38 of 3,555 decks)
- Sedris, the Traitor King relevance 0.21 · 1.4% (16 of 1,106 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Kraum, Ludevic's Opus relevance 0.21 · 1.9% (8 of 413 decks)
- Anhelo, the Painter relevance 0.20 · 1.1% (35 of 3,328 decks)
- Jeleva, Nephalia's Scourge relevance 0.20 · 1.3% (20 of 1,581 decks)
- Lord Xander, the Collector relevance 0.20 · 1.2% (23 of 1,918 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.20 · 1.3% (16 of 1,201 decks)
- Crosis, the Purger relevance 0.19 · 1.6% (10 of 616 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Step Through relevance 1.39 · 38.6% (3,410 of 8,845 decks)
- Bloodline Necromancer relevance 1.36 · 36.8% (3,254 of 8,845 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 1.13 · 32.9% (2,912 of 8,845 decks)
- Vedalken Aethermage relevance 1.12 · 26.5% (2,341 of 8,845 decks)
- Unearth relevance 1.09 · 29.0% (2,564 of 8,845 decks)
- Dualcaster Mage relevance 1.05 · 44.6% (3,945 of 8,845 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 1.03 · 51.9% (4,587 of 8,845 decks)
- Ruthless Technomancer relevance 1.03 · 25.9% (2,293 of 8,845 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 1.00 · 54.1% (4,788 of 8,845 decks)
- Thassa's Oracle relevance 0.97 · 38.8% (3,435 of 8,845 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.96 · 43.7% (3,864 of 8,845 decks)
- Naban, Dean of Iteration relevance 0.95 · 27.5% (2,429 of 8,845 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.95 · 39.0% (3,450 of 8,845 decks)
- Burnt Offering relevance 0.94 · 25.5% (2,259 of 8,845 decks)
- Scholar of the Ages relevance 0.94 · 19.5% (1,729 of 8,845 decks)
- Entomb relevance 0.92 · 32.1% (2,836 of 8,845 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.90 · 55.8% (4,935 of 8,845 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.90 · 40.3% (3,567 of 8,845 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.90 · 47.9% (4,236 of 8,845 decks)
- Finale of Promise relevance 0.90 · 18.8% (1,666 of 8,845 decks)
- Underworld Breach relevance 0.89 · 42.6% (3,768 of 8,845 decks)
- Aether Channeler relevance 0.89 · 23.0% (2,032 of 8,845 decks)
- Culling the Weak relevance 0.88 · 32.1% (2,839 of 8,845 decks)
- Harmonic Prodigy relevance 0.88 · 38.8% (3,432 of 8,845 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.87 · 35.0% (3,092 of 8,845 decks)
- Demonic Consultation relevance 0.87 · 33.5% (2,962 of 8,845 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.85 · 54.0% (4,778 of 8,845 decks)
- Brain Freeze relevance 0.84 · 33.5% (2,960 of 8,845 decks)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 0.83 · 37.0% (3,271 of 8,845 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 0.83 · 28.3% (2,504 of 8,845 decks)
All creatures (16)
- Bloodline Necromancer relevance 1.36 · 36.8% (3,254 of 8,845 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 1.13 · 32.9% (2,912 of 8,845 decks)
- Vedalken Aethermage relevance 1.12 · 26.5% (2,341 of 8,845 decks)
- Dualcaster Mage relevance 1.05 · 44.6% (3,945 of 8,845 decks)
- Ruthless Technomancer relevance 1.03 · 25.9% (2,293 of 8,845 decks)
- Thassa's Oracle relevance 0.97 · 38.8% (3,435 of 8,845 decks)
- Naban, Dean of Iteration relevance 0.95 · 27.5% (2,429 of 8,845 decks)
- Scholar of the Ages relevance 0.94 · 19.5% (1,729 of 8,845 decks)
- Aether Channeler relevance 0.89 · 23.0% (2,032 of 8,845 decks)
- Harmonic Prodigy relevance 0.88 · 38.8% (3,432 of 8,845 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 0.83 · 28.3% (2,504 of 8,845 decks)
- Stonybrook Banneret relevance 0.83 · 19.4% (1,713 of 8,845 decks)
- Naru Meha, Master Wizard relevance 0.77 · 18.1% (1,601 of 8,845 decks)
- Azami, Lady of Scrolls relevance 0.77 · 18.6% (1,649 of 8,845 decks)
- Apprentice Necromancer relevance 0.76 · 19.2% (1,695 of 8,845 decks)
- Simian Spirit Guide relevance 0.76 · 30.0% (2,650 of 8,845 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.96 · 43.7% (3,864 of 8,845 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.82 · 33.3% (2,948 of 8,845 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.79 · 31.9% (2,820 of 8,845 decks)
- Wishclaw Talisman relevance 0.78 · 31.4% (2,781 of 8,845 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Mystic Remora relevance 1.00 · 54.1% (4,788 of 8,845 decks)
- Underworld Breach relevance 0.89 · 42.6% (3,768 of 8,845 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.85 · 54.0% (4,778 of 8,845 decks)
All instants (15)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 1.03 · 51.9% (4,587 of 8,845 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.95 · 39.0% (3,450 of 8,845 decks)
- Burnt Offering relevance 0.94 · 25.5% (2,259 of 8,845 decks)
- Entomb relevance 0.92 · 32.1% (2,836 of 8,845 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.90 · 40.3% (3,567 of 8,845 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.90 · 47.9% (4,236 of 8,845 decks)
- Culling the Weak relevance 0.88 · 32.1% (2,839 of 8,845 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.87 · 35.0% (3,092 of 8,845 decks)
- Demonic Consultation relevance 0.87 · 33.5% (2,962 of 8,845 decks)
- Brain Freeze relevance 0.84 · 33.5% (2,960 of 8,845 decks)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 0.83 · 37.0% (3,271 of 8,845 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.82 · 29.7% (2,631 of 8,845 decks)
- Tainted Pact relevance 0.80 · 28.5% (2,518 of 8,845 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.80 · 50.5% (4,468 of 8,845 decks)
- Shallow Grave relevance 0.79 · 15.3% (1,356 of 8,845 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Step Through relevance 1.39 · 38.6% (3,410 of 8,845 decks)
- Unearth relevance 1.09 · 29.0% (2,564 of 8,845 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.90 · 55.8% (4,935 of 8,845 decks)
- Finale of Promise relevance 0.90 · 18.8% (1,666 of 8,845 decks)
- Persist relevance 0.80 · 22.9% (2,022 of 8,845 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 0.91 · 26.6% (2,354 of 8,845 decks)
All lands (6)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.89 · 41.5% (3,673 of 8,845 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.88 · 45.4% (4,012 of 8,845 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.82 · 35.6% (3,149 of 8,845 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.79 · 33.2% (2,935 of 8,845 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.78 · 30.8% (2,727 of 8,845 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.77 · 63.2% (5,590 of 8,845 decks)
EDH data for Spellseeker: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 8,845 real decks.


















































































