Ravenous Slime
Played in 163 Selesnya decks
Color Identity Spread
2.5% Selesnya
All commanders (4)
- Bess, Soul Nourisher relevance 1.40 · 1.3% (15 of 1,141 decks)
- Mikey & Leo, Chaos & Order relevance 0.92 · 1.1% (6 of 555 decks)
- Slurrk, All-Ingesting // Alharu, Solemn Ritualist relevance 0.75 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Yoshimaru, Ever Faithful // Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 0.51 · 4.8% (1 of 21 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Predator Ooze relevance 0.95 · 16.6% (27 of 163 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 0.94 · 30.7% (50 of 163 decks)
- Ayula, Queen Among Bears relevance 0.94 · 26.4% (43 of 163 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.94 · 53.4% (87 of 163 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.86 · 36.8% (60 of 163 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.81 · 31.9% (52 of 163 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.71 · 38.0% (62 of 163 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.68 · 29.4% (48 of 163 decks)
- Scavenging Ooze relevance 0.66 · 21.5% (35 of 163 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 0.66 · 19.0% (31 of 163 decks)
- Reverence relevance 0.65 · 15.3% (25 of 163 decks)
- Kutzil, Malamet Exemplar relevance 0.61 · 49.1% (80 of 163 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.61 · 23.3% (38 of 163 decks)
- Duskshell Crawler relevance 0.61 · 20.2% (33 of 163 decks)
- Abzan Falconer relevance 0.61 · 26.4% (43 of 163 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.60 · 25.2% (41 of 163 decks)
- Requisition Raid relevance 0.60 · 22.1% (36 of 163 decks)
- Biowaste Blob relevance 0.60 · 9.8% (16 of 163 decks)
- Park Heights Maverick relevance 0.59 · 9.8% (16 of 163 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.58 · 30.1% (49 of 163 decks)
- Botanical Brawler relevance 0.58 · 17.2% (28 of 163 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.58 · 14.7% (24 of 163 decks)
- Oran-Rief Ooze relevance 0.57 · 10.4% (17 of 163 decks)
- Luminarch Aspirant relevance 0.56 · 16.6% (27 of 163 decks)
- Conclave Mentor relevance 0.55 · 22.7% (37 of 163 decks)
- Mikaeus, the Lunarch relevance 0.55 · 20.2% (33 of 163 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.54 · 19.0% (31 of 163 decks)
- Warden of the Grove relevance 0.54 · 16.0% (26 of 163 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.53 · 16.0% (26 of 163 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.52 · 18.4% (30 of 163 decks)
All creatures (37)
- Predator Ooze relevance 0.95 · 16.6% (27 of 163 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 0.94 · 30.7% (50 of 163 decks)
- Ayula, Queen Among Bears relevance 0.94 · 26.4% (43 of 163 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.94 · 53.4% (87 of 163 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.86 · 36.8% (60 of 163 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.81 · 31.9% (52 of 163 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.68 · 29.4% (48 of 163 decks)
- Scavenging Ooze relevance 0.66 · 21.5% (35 of 163 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 0.66 · 19.0% (31 of 163 decks)
- Kutzil, Malamet Exemplar relevance 0.61 · 49.1% (80 of 163 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.61 · 23.3% (38 of 163 decks)
- Duskshell Crawler relevance 0.61 · 20.2% (33 of 163 decks)
- Abzan Falconer relevance 0.61 · 26.4% (43 of 163 decks)
- Biowaste Blob relevance 0.60 · 9.8% (16 of 163 decks)
- Park Heights Maverick relevance 0.59 · 9.8% (16 of 163 decks)
- Botanical Brawler relevance 0.58 · 17.2% (28 of 163 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.58 · 14.7% (24 of 163 decks)
- Oran-Rief Ooze relevance 0.57 · 10.4% (17 of 163 decks)
- Luminarch Aspirant relevance 0.56 · 16.6% (27 of 163 decks)
- Conclave Mentor relevance 0.55 · 22.7% (37 of 163 decks)
- Mikaeus, the Lunarch relevance 0.55 · 20.2% (33 of 163 decks)
- Warden of the Grove relevance 0.54 · 16.0% (26 of 163 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.53 · 16.0% (26 of 163 decks)
- Ochre Jelly relevance 0.52 · 9.8% (16 of 163 decks)
- Elesh Norn, Grand Cenobite relevance 0.52 · 19.0% (31 of 163 decks)
- Biogenic Ooze relevance 0.51 · 8.0% (13 of 163 decks)
- Cultivator of Blades relevance 0.49 · 8.6% (14 of 163 decks)
- Benevolent Hydra relevance 0.49 · 11.0% (18 of 163 decks)
- Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 0.49 · 8.0% (13 of 163 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.48 · 16.0% (26 of 163 decks)
- Sovereign Okinec Ahau relevance 0.47 · 17.8% (29 of 163 decks)
- Arwen, Weaver of Hope relevance 0.47 · 13.5% (22 of 163 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.47 · 15.3% (25 of 163 decks)
- Mother of Runes relevance 0.46 · 17.2% (28 of 163 decks)
- Kodama of the West Tree relevance 0.45 · 16.0% (26 of 163 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.45 · 23.3% (38 of 163 decks)
- Aeve, Progenitor Ooze relevance 0.45 · 6.7% (11 of 163 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.54 · 19.0% (31 of 163 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.71 · 38.0% (62 of 163 decks)
- Reverence relevance 0.65 · 15.3% (25 of 163 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.60 · 25.2% (41 of 163 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.52 · 18.4% (30 of 163 decks)
- Flowering of the White Tree relevance 0.52 · 17.2% (28 of 163 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.48 · 21.5% (35 of 163 decks)
All instants (1)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.58 · 30.1% (49 of 163 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Requisition Raid relevance 0.60 · 22.1% (36 of 163 decks)
- Damning Verdict relevance 0.46 · 16.6% (27 of 163 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.64 · 20.2% (33 of 163 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.58 · 20.9% (34 of 163 decks)
- Gavony Township relevance 0.50 · 33.7% (55 of 163 decks)
EDH data for Ravenous Slime: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 163 real decks.