Dark Maze
Played in 42 Azorius decks
230+24+1+4+17+4+
Color Identity Spread
27.1% Azorius
Commanders
Most Relevant
Contradict 78.6% of decks
Contradict 78.6% of decks
Daring Sleuth // Bearer of Overwhelming Truths 73.8% of decks
Daring Sleuth // Bearer of Overwhelming Truths 73.8% of decks
Deny Existence 73.8% of decks
Deny Existence 73.8% of decks
Counsel of the Soratami 76.2% of decks
Counsel of the Soratami 76.2% of decks
Deep Freeze 73.8% of decks
Deep Freeze 73.8% of decks
Dance of Many 78.6% of decks
Dance of Many 78.6% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Jedit Ojanen relevance 0.60 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- The Grand Calcutron relevance 0.52 · 1.2% (1 of 81 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Contradict relevance 5.19 · 78.6% (33 of 42 decks)
- Daring Sleuth // Bearer of Overwhelming Truths relevance 5.03 · 73.8% (31 of 42 decks)
- Deny Existence relevance 5.01 · 73.8% (31 of 42 decks)
- Counsel of the Soratami relevance 4.98 · 76.2% (32 of 42 decks)
- Deep Freeze relevance 4.97 · 73.8% (31 of 42 decks)
- Dance of Many relevance 4.97 · 78.6% (33 of 42 decks)
- Dire Downdraft relevance 4.95 · 73.8% (31 of 42 decks)
- Cryptoplasm relevance 4.92 · 71.4% (30 of 42 decks)
- Djinni Windseer relevance 4.91 · 71.4% (30 of 42 decks)
- Deem Inferior relevance 4.91 · 71.4% (30 of 42 decks)
- Constrictor Sage relevance 4.91 · 73.8% (31 of 42 decks)
- Counterlash relevance 4.86 · 71.4% (30 of 42 decks)
- Compelling Argument relevance 4.84 · 71.4% (30 of 42 decks)
- Discontinuity relevance 4.78 · 73.8% (31 of 42 decks)
- Crypsis relevance 4.77 · 73.8% (31 of 42 decks)
- Air Elemental relevance 4.77 · 69.0% (29 of 42 decks)
- Dispersal Shield relevance 4.74 · 69.0% (29 of 42 decks)
- Dispelling Exhale relevance 4.74 · 69.0% (29 of 42 decks)
- Cyclone Summoner relevance 4.74 · 71.4% (30 of 42 decks)
- Departed Deckhand relevance 4.73 · 71.4% (30 of 42 decks)
- Devious Cover-Up relevance 4.73 · 76.2% (32 of 42 decks)
- Deluge Virtuoso relevance 4.71 · 73.8% (31 of 42 decks)
- Collector's Case relevance 4.70 · 69.0% (29 of 42 decks)
- Court Hussar relevance 4.70 · 71.4% (30 of 42 decks)
- Conundrum Sphinx relevance 4.69 · 69.0% (29 of 42 decks)
- Complicate relevance 4.68 · 71.4% (30 of 42 decks)
- Curfew relevance 4.68 · 71.4% (30 of 42 decks)
- Draconic Lore relevance 4.67 · 69.0% (29 of 42 decks)
- Cosmic Epiphany relevance 4.67 · 69.0% (29 of 42 decks)
- Deceiver Exarch relevance 4.67 · 71.4% (30 of 42 decks)
All creatures (24)
- Daring Sleuth // Bearer of Overwhelming Truths relevance 5.03 · 73.8% (31 of 42 decks)
- Cryptoplasm relevance 4.92 · 71.4% (30 of 42 decks)
- Djinni Windseer relevance 4.91 · 71.4% (30 of 42 decks)
- Constrictor Sage relevance 4.91 · 73.8% (31 of 42 decks)
- Air Elemental relevance 4.77 · 69.0% (29 of 42 decks)
- Cyclone Summoner relevance 4.74 · 71.4% (30 of 42 decks)
- Departed Deckhand relevance 4.73 · 71.4% (30 of 42 decks)
- Deluge Virtuoso relevance 4.71 · 73.8% (31 of 42 decks)
- Court Hussar relevance 4.70 · 71.4% (30 of 42 decks)
- Conundrum Sphinx relevance 4.69 · 69.0% (29 of 42 decks)
- Deceiver Exarch relevance 4.67 · 71.4% (30 of 42 decks)
- Deep-Sea Kraken relevance 4.66 · 71.4% (30 of 42 decks)
- Academy Journeymage relevance 4.66 · 71.4% (30 of 42 decks)
- Conspiracy Unraveler relevance 4.64 · 71.4% (30 of 42 decks)
- Disruptive Student relevance 4.62 · 69.0% (29 of 42 decks)
- Dawnfeather Eagle relevance 4.60 · 69.0% (29 of 42 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 4.59 · 66.7% (28 of 42 decks)
- Covert Technician relevance 4.59 · 69.0% (29 of 42 decks)
- Cold Case Cracker relevance 4.58 · 69.0% (29 of 42 decks)
- Corsair Captain relevance 4.58 · 71.4% (30 of 42 decks)
- Academy Researchers relevance 4.58 · 69.0% (29 of 42 decks)
- Aspiring Aeronaut relevance 4.57 · 66.7% (28 of 42 decks)
- Deepmuck Desperado relevance 4.57 · 71.4% (30 of 42 decks)
- Cosi's Trickster relevance 4.56 · 69.0% (29 of 42 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Collector's Case relevance 4.70 · 69.0% (29 of 42 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Deep Freeze relevance 4.97 · 73.8% (31 of 42 decks)
- Dance of Many relevance 4.97 · 78.6% (33 of 42 decks)
- Compulsion relevance 4.64 · 73.8% (31 of 42 decks)
- Confiscate relevance 4.57 · 76.2% (32 of 42 decks)
All instants (17)
- Contradict relevance 5.19 · 78.6% (33 of 42 decks)
- Deny Existence relevance 5.01 · 73.8% (31 of 42 decks)
- Dire Downdraft relevance 4.95 · 73.8% (31 of 42 decks)
- Counterlash relevance 4.86 · 71.4% (30 of 42 decks)
- Discontinuity relevance 4.78 · 73.8% (31 of 42 decks)
- Crypsis relevance 4.77 · 73.8% (31 of 42 decks)
- Dispersal Shield relevance 4.74 · 69.0% (29 of 42 decks)
- Dispelling Exhale relevance 4.74 · 69.0% (29 of 42 decks)
- Devious Cover-Up relevance 4.73 · 76.2% (32 of 42 decks)
- Complicate relevance 4.68 · 71.4% (30 of 42 decks)
- Curfew relevance 4.68 · 71.4% (30 of 42 decks)
- Draconic Lore relevance 4.67 · 69.0% (29 of 42 decks)
- Decoy Gambit relevance 4.63 · 71.4% (30 of 42 decks)
- Depower relevance 4.63 · 71.4% (30 of 42 decks)
- Countermand relevance 4.63 · 71.4% (30 of 42 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 4.58 · 76.2% (32 of 42 decks)
- Catalog relevance 4.57 · 69.0% (29 of 42 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Counsel of the Soratami relevance 4.98 · 76.2% (32 of 42 decks)
- Deem Inferior relevance 4.91 · 71.4% (30 of 42 decks)
- Compelling Argument relevance 4.84 · 71.4% (30 of 42 decks)
- Cosmic Epiphany relevance 4.67 · 69.0% (29 of 42 decks)
EDH data for Dark Maze: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 42 real decks.













































