Infernal Contract
Played in 86 Rakdos decks
Color Identity Spread
4.9% Rakdos
- Orzhov 745 · 42.2%
- Black 668 · 37.8%
- Golgari 104 · 5.9%
- Rakdos 86 · 4.9%
- Other (12) 163 · 9.2%
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (2)
- Rowan, Scion of War relevance 2.66 · 1.0% (57 of 5,491 decks)
- Rakdos the Defiler relevance 0.76 · 1.3% (2 of 160 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Blood Celebrant relevance 2.34 · 52.3% (45 of 86 decks)
- Wall of Blood relevance 2.09 · 47.7% (41 of 86 decks)
- K'rrik, Son of Yawgmoth relevance 1.95 · 55.8% (48 of 86 decks)
- Treasonous Ogre relevance 1.64 · 46.5% (40 of 86 decks)
- Peer into the Abyss relevance 1.53 · 45.3% (39 of 86 decks)
- Jaya's Immolating Inferno relevance 1.47 · 37.2% (32 of 86 decks)
- Crackle with Power relevance 1.37 · 44.2% (38 of 86 decks)
- Exsanguinate relevance 1.34 · 62.8% (54 of 86 decks)
- Fire Covenant relevance 1.28 · 46.5% (40 of 86 decks)
- Dark Confidant relevance 1.26 · 40.7% (35 of 86 decks)
- Immolating Souleater relevance 1.25 · 25.6% (22 of 86 decks)
- Dark Tutelage relevance 1.22 · 26.7% (23 of 86 decks)
- Vilis, Broker of Blood relevance 1.22 · 36.0% (31 of 86 decks)
- Doom Whisperer relevance 1.20 · 27.9% (24 of 86 decks)
- Erebos's Intervention relevance 1.18 · 24.4% (21 of 86 decks)
- Damnable Pact relevance 1.16 · 26.7% (23 of 86 decks)
- Dismember relevance 1.14 · 36.0% (31 of 86 decks)
- March of Wretched Sorrow relevance 1.11 · 22.1% (19 of 86 decks)
- Storm King's Thunder relevance 1.09 · 22.1% (19 of 86 decks)
- Darkstar Augur relevance 1.06 · 24.4% (21 of 86 decks)
- Apex of Power relevance 1.06 · 24.4% (21 of 86 decks)
- Unspeakable Symbol relevance 1.01 · 18.6% (16 of 86 decks)
- Comet Storm relevance 1.01 · 26.7% (23 of 86 decks)
- Patriar's Seal relevance 0.99 · 18.6% (16 of 86 decks)
- Ad Nauseam relevance 0.94 · 25.6% (22 of 86 decks)
- Plunge into Darkness relevance 0.88 · 17.4% (15 of 86 decks)
- Greed relevance 0.88 · 19.8% (17 of 86 decks)
- Torment of Hailfire relevance 0.88 · 31.4% (27 of 86 decks)
- Staff of Compleation relevance 0.87 · 19.8% (17 of 86 decks)
- Doomsday relevance 0.87 · 16.3% (14 of 86 decks)
All creatures (12)
- Blood Celebrant relevance 2.34 · 52.3% (45 of 86 decks)
- Wall of Blood relevance 2.09 · 47.7% (41 of 86 decks)
- K'rrik, Son of Yawgmoth relevance 1.95 · 55.8% (48 of 86 decks)
- Treasonous Ogre relevance 1.64 · 46.5% (40 of 86 decks)
- Dark Confidant relevance 1.26 · 40.7% (35 of 86 decks)
- Immolating Souleater relevance 1.25 · 25.6% (22 of 86 decks)
- Vilis, Broker of Blood relevance 1.22 · 36.0% (31 of 86 decks)
- Doom Whisperer relevance 1.20 · 27.9% (24 of 86 decks)
- Darkstar Augur relevance 1.06 · 24.4% (21 of 86 decks)
- Myr Convert relevance 0.86 · 17.4% (15 of 86 decks)
- Arco-Flagellant relevance 0.80 · 14.0% (12 of 86 decks)
- Defiler of Flesh relevance 0.74 · 14.0% (12 of 86 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Patriar's Seal relevance 0.99 · 18.6% (16 of 86 decks)
- Staff of Compleation relevance 0.87 · 19.8% (17 of 86 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.85 · 16.3% (14 of 86 decks)
- Bolas's Citadel relevance 0.85 · 34.9% (30 of 86 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Dark Tutelage relevance 1.22 · 26.7% (23 of 86 decks)
- Unspeakable Symbol relevance 1.01 · 18.6% (16 of 86 decks)
- Greed relevance 0.88 · 19.8% (17 of 86 decks)
- Necropotence relevance 0.83 · 27.9% (24 of 86 decks)
All instants (10)
- Fire Covenant relevance 1.28 · 46.5% (40 of 86 decks)
- Erebos's Intervention relevance 1.18 · 24.4% (21 of 86 decks)
- Dismember relevance 1.14 · 36.0% (31 of 86 decks)
- March of Wretched Sorrow relevance 1.11 · 22.1% (19 of 86 decks)
- Storm King's Thunder relevance 1.09 · 22.1% (19 of 86 decks)
- Comet Storm relevance 1.01 · 26.7% (23 of 86 decks)
- Ad Nauseam relevance 0.94 · 25.6% (22 of 86 decks)
- Plunge into Darkness relevance 0.88 · 17.4% (15 of 86 decks)
- Commune with Lava relevance 0.79 · 19.8% (17 of 86 decks)
- Burnt Offering relevance 0.74 · 24.4% (21 of 86 decks)
All sorceries (12)
- Peer into the Abyss relevance 1.53 · 45.3% (39 of 86 decks)
- Jaya's Immolating Inferno relevance 1.47 · 37.2% (32 of 86 decks)
- Crackle with Power relevance 1.37 · 44.2% (38 of 86 decks)
- Exsanguinate relevance 1.34 · 62.8% (54 of 86 decks)
- Damnable Pact relevance 1.16 · 26.7% (23 of 86 decks)
- Apex of Power relevance 1.06 · 24.4% (21 of 86 decks)
- Torment of Hailfire relevance 0.88 · 31.4% (27 of 86 decks)
- Doomsday relevance 0.87 · 16.3% (14 of 86 decks)
- Repay in Kind relevance 0.84 · 15.1% (13 of 86 decks)
- Night's Whisper relevance 0.78 · 48.8% (42 of 86 decks)
- Profane Transfusion relevance 0.74 · 15.1% (13 of 86 decks)
- Pain's Reward relevance 0.74 · 14.0% (12 of 86 decks)
All utility lands (6)
- Ifnir Deadlands relevance 1.44 · 34.9% (30 of 86 decks)
- Ramunap Ruins relevance 1.35 · 32.6% (28 of 86 decks)
- Hall of the Bandit Lord relevance 1.19 · 25.6% (22 of 86 decks)
- Barbarian Ring relevance 1.15 · 30.2% (26 of 86 decks)
- Cabal Pit relevance 0.89 · 20.9% (18 of 86 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Shelters All relevance 0.76 · 15.1% (13 of 86 decks)
All lands (2)
- Tarnished Citadel relevance 1.02 · 23.3% (20 of 86 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.91 · 33.7% (29 of 86 decks)
EDH data for Infernal Contract: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 86 real decks.