Power Matrix
Played in 92 Gruul decks
Color Identity Spread
3.3% Gruul
- Boros 226 · 8.0%
- White 220 · 7.8%
- Black 213 · 7.6%
- Selesnya 208 · 7.4%
- Green 204 · 7.2%
- Golgari 190 · 6.7%
- Red 178 · 6.3%
- Mardu 173 · 6.1%
- Colorless 127 · 4.5%
- Five-Color 122 · 4.3%
- Dimir 93 · 3.3%
- Gruul 92 · 3.3%
- Azorius 86 · 3.0%
- Grixis 86 · 3.0%
- Blue 65 · 2.3%
- Rakdos 62 · 2.2%
- Other (16) 476 · 16.9%
All commanders (4)
- Stonebrow, Krosan Hero relevance 0.92 · 1.5% (3 of 196 decks)
- Meet and Greet "Sisay" relevance 0.52 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Hardy Outlander // Livaan, Cultist of Tiamat relevance 0.48 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.47 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Nevinyrral's Disk relevance 0.64 · 16.3% (15 of 92 decks)
- Gruul War Plow relevance 0.62 · 14.1% (13 of 92 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.61 · 25.0% (23 of 92 decks)
- Trailtracker Scout relevance 0.60 · 23.9% (22 of 92 decks)
- Gratuitous Violence relevance 0.59 · 26.1% (24 of 92 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.58 · 21.7% (20 of 92 decks)
- Berserkers' Onslaught relevance 0.54 · 23.9% (22 of 92 decks)
- Esika's Chariot relevance 0.51 · 18.5% (17 of 92 decks)
- Thickest in the Thicket relevance 0.48 · 18.5% (17 of 92 decks)
- Visions of Dominance relevance 0.48 · 8.7% (8 of 92 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.47 · 13.0% (12 of 92 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.46 · 31.5% (29 of 92 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.46 · 19.6% (18 of 92 decks)
- Mage Slayer relevance 0.45 · 15.2% (14 of 92 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.44 · 21.7% (20 of 92 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.43 · 16.3% (15 of 92 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.43 · 15.2% (14 of 92 decks)
- Grumgully, the Generous relevance 0.43 · 15.2% (14 of 92 decks)
- Aligned Hedron Network relevance 0.43 · 8.7% (8 of 92 decks)
- Tangle relevance 0.42 · 8.7% (8 of 92 decks)
- Decimate relevance 0.42 · 26.1% (24 of 92 decks)
- Wandertale Mentor relevance 0.42 · 16.3% (15 of 92 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.41 · 31.5% (29 of 92 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.41 · 26.1% (24 of 92 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.40 · 17.4% (16 of 92 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.40 · 15.2% (14 of 92 decks)
- Nature's Will relevance 0.40 · 14.1% (13 of 92 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.39 · 12.0% (11 of 92 decks)
- Saryth, the Viper's Fang relevance 0.39 · 12.0% (11 of 92 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.38 · 19.6% (18 of 92 decks)
All creatures (9)
- Trailtracker Scout relevance 0.60 · 23.9% (22 of 92 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.46 · 19.6% (18 of 92 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.44 · 21.7% (20 of 92 decks)
- Grumgully, the Generous relevance 0.43 · 15.2% (14 of 92 decks)
- Wandertale Mentor relevance 0.42 · 16.3% (15 of 92 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.41 · 26.1% (24 of 92 decks)
- Saryth, the Viper's Fang relevance 0.39 · 12.0% (11 of 92 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.38 · 12.0% (11 of 92 decks)
- Wildsear, Scouring Maw relevance 0.36 · 13.0% (12 of 92 decks)
All artifacts (13)
- Nevinyrral's Disk relevance 0.64 · 16.3% (15 of 92 decks)
- Gruul War Plow relevance 0.62 · 14.1% (13 of 92 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.61 · 25.0% (23 of 92 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.58 · 21.7% (20 of 92 decks)
- Esika's Chariot relevance 0.51 · 18.5% (17 of 92 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.47 · 13.0% (12 of 92 decks)
- Mage Slayer relevance 0.45 · 15.2% (14 of 92 decks)
- Aligned Hedron Network relevance 0.43 · 8.7% (8 of 92 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.40 · 15.2% (14 of 92 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.39 · 12.0% (11 of 92 decks)
- Commander's Plate relevance 0.38 · 9.8% (9 of 92 decks)
- Hedron Archive relevance 0.37 · 13.0% (12 of 92 decks)
- Gruul Signet relevance 0.35 · 22.8% (21 of 92 decks)
All enchantments (10)
- Gratuitous Violence relevance 0.59 · 26.1% (24 of 92 decks)
- Berserkers' Onslaught relevance 0.54 · 23.9% (22 of 92 decks)
- Thickest in the Thicket relevance 0.48 · 18.5% (17 of 92 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.46 · 31.5% (29 of 92 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.43 · 16.3% (15 of 92 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.43 · 15.2% (14 of 92 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.40 · 17.4% (16 of 92 decks)
- Nature's Will relevance 0.40 · 14.1% (13 of 92 decks)
- Warstorm Surge relevance 0.36 · 17.4% (16 of 92 decks)
- Flameshadow Conjuring relevance 0.36 · 8.7% (8 of 92 decks)
All instants (2)
- Tangle relevance 0.42 · 8.7% (8 of 92 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.38 · 19.6% (18 of 92 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Visions of Dominance relevance 0.48 · 8.7% (8 of 92 decks)
- Decimate relevance 0.42 · 26.1% (24 of 92 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.41 · 31.5% (29 of 92 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.38 · 19.6% (18 of 92 decks)
All utility lands (8)
- Skarrg, the Rage Pits relevance 0.58 · 23.9% (22 of 92 decks)
- Temple of Abandon relevance 0.45 · 32.6% (30 of 92 decks)
- Raging Ravine relevance 0.41 · 17.4% (16 of 92 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.41 · 22.8% (21 of 92 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.38 · 27.2% (25 of 92 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.38 · 26.1% (24 of 92 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.37 · 26.1% (24 of 92 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.36 · 15.2% (14 of 92 decks)
All lands (4)
- Copperline Gorge relevance 0.51 · 30.4% (28 of 92 decks)
- Mossfire Valley relevance 0.49 · 40.2% (37 of 92 decks)
- Wooded Ridgeline relevance 0.49 · 21.7% (20 of 92 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.37 · 26.1% (24 of 92 decks)
EDH data for Power Matrix: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 92 real decks.