Sandwurm Convergence
Played in 9,004 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
28.2% Green
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (30)
- Baru, Wurmspeaker relevance 4.24 · 82.2% (2,011 of 2,445 decks)
- Kona, Rescue Beastie relevance 3.38 · 41.2% (2,283 of 5,547 decks)
- Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 3.04 · 47.5% (731 of 1,539 decks)
- Esika's Chariot relevance 1.75 · 28.8% (103 of 358 decks)
- Grothama, All-Devouring relevance 1.65 · 19.3% (193 of 1,000 decks)
- Nissa, Worldsoul Speaker relevance 1.20 · 12.1% (128 of 1,055 decks)
- Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger relevance 1.16 · 13.5% (84 of 623 decks)
- Arashi, the Sky Asunder relevance 1.04 · 40.0% (10 of 25 decks)
- Sakiko, Mother of Summer relevance 0.99 · 19.5% (22 of 113 decks)
- Rhonas the Indomitable relevance 0.94 · 12.0% (45 of 374 decks)
- Dosan the Falling Leaf relevance 0.92 · 16.4% (23 of 140 decks)
- The Earth King relevance 0.84 · 7.0% (111 of 1,579 decks)
- Groundchuck & Dirtbag relevance 0.83 · 13.1% (24 of 183 decks)
- Shigeki, Jukai Visionary relevance 0.75 · 7.0% (68 of 972 decks)
- Shizuko, Caller of Autumn relevance 0.73 · 13.1% (16 of 122 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Mana relevance 0.73 · 4.6% (235 of 5,093 decks)
- The Cabbage Merchant relevance 0.72 · 5.1% (156 of 3,083 decks)
- Pia, Aether Ascetic relevance 0.72 · 7.1% (55 of 776 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.70 · 7.7% (41 of 533 decks)
- Emissary Green relevance 0.68 · 9.3% (24 of 259 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.67 · 5.6% (80 of 1,416 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.67 · 4.8% (141 of 2,966 decks)
- Sachi, Daughter of Seshiro relevance 0.67 · 9.9% (20 of 203 decks)
- Pir, Imaginative Rascal relevance 0.67 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- God-Eternal Rhonas relevance 0.66 · 17.4% (8 of 46 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.58 · 6.9% (27 of 393 decks)
- Ojer Kaslem, Deepest Growth // Temple of Cultivation relevance 0.55 · 5.2% (45 of 872 decks)
- Yorvo, Lord of Garenbrig relevance 0.54 · 5.8% (31 of 538 decks)
- Zopandrel, Hunger Dominus relevance 0.54 · 6.3% (25 of 399 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.52 · 4.1% (69 of 1,689 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 1.36 · 49.5% (4,460 of 9,004 decks)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 1.17 · 36.6% (3,295 of 9,004 decks)
- Engulfing Slagwurm relevance 0.95 · 22.8% (2,053 of 9,004 decks)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 0.83 · 20.8% (1,869 of 9,004 decks)
- Penumbra Wurm relevance 0.81 · 17.5% (1,575 of 9,004 decks)
- Elderscale Wurm relevance 0.81 · 18.5% (1,670 of 9,004 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.79 · 31.1% (2,796 of 9,004 decks)
- Quilled Greatwurm relevance 0.77 · 26.3% (2,366 of 9,004 decks)
- Emergent Woodwurm relevance 0.77 · 18.8% (1,692 of 9,004 decks)
- Sifter Wurm relevance 0.76 · 16.3% (1,465 of 9,004 decks)
- Bellowing Tanglewurm relevance 0.75 · 25.8% (2,320 of 9,004 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.75 · 20.3% (1,831 of 9,004 decks)
- Plated Slagwurm relevance 0.74 · 15.6% (1,409 of 9,004 decks)
- Wurmcoil Engine relevance 0.74 · 17.8% (1,602 of 9,004 decks)
- Jaspera Sentinel relevance 0.72 · 18.7% (1,683 of 9,004 decks)
- Bookwurm relevance 0.71 · 15.4% (1,384 of 9,004 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.71 · 47.6% (4,282 of 9,004 decks)
- Panglacial Wurm relevance 0.68 · 15.0% (1,347 of 9,004 decks)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 0.67 · 22.2% (2,002 of 9,004 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.67 · 27.7% (2,490 of 9,004 decks)
- Beanstalk Wurm // Plant Beans relevance 0.66 · 15.2% (1,373 of 9,004 decks)
- Stonehoof Chieftain relevance 0.66 · 19.6% (1,769 of 9,004 decks)
- Dirtcowl Wurm relevance 0.66 · 13.5% (1,213 of 9,004 decks)
- Bramble Wurm relevance 0.65 · 14.3% (1,288 of 9,004 decks)
- Balustrade Wurm relevance 0.64 · 13.8% (1,243 of 9,004 decks)
- Relic of Legends relevance 0.64 · 15.7% (1,411 of 9,004 decks)
- Saruli Caretaker relevance 0.63 · 14.6% (1,311 of 9,004 decks)
- Loam Dryad relevance 0.62 · 14.2% (1,280 of 9,004 decks)
- Giant Adephage relevance 0.61 · 16.8% (1,517 of 9,004 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.60 · 26.6% (2,399 of 9,004 decks)
All creatures (36)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 1.36 · 49.5% (4,460 of 9,004 decks)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 1.17 · 36.6% (3,295 of 9,004 decks)
- Engulfing Slagwurm relevance 0.95 · 22.8% (2,053 of 9,004 decks)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 0.83 · 20.8% (1,869 of 9,004 decks)
- Penumbra Wurm relevance 0.81 · 17.5% (1,575 of 9,004 decks)
- Elderscale Wurm relevance 0.81 · 18.5% (1,670 of 9,004 decks)
- Quilled Greatwurm relevance 0.77 · 26.3% (2,366 of 9,004 decks)
- Emergent Woodwurm relevance 0.77 · 18.8% (1,692 of 9,004 decks)
- Sifter Wurm relevance 0.76 · 16.3% (1,465 of 9,004 decks)
- Bellowing Tanglewurm relevance 0.75 · 25.8% (2,320 of 9,004 decks)
- Plated Slagwurm relevance 0.74 · 15.6% (1,409 of 9,004 decks)
- Wurmcoil Engine relevance 0.74 · 17.8% (1,602 of 9,004 decks)
- Jaspera Sentinel relevance 0.72 · 18.7% (1,683 of 9,004 decks)
- Bookwurm relevance 0.71 · 15.4% (1,384 of 9,004 decks)
- Panglacial Wurm relevance 0.68 · 15.0% (1,347 of 9,004 decks)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 0.67 · 22.2% (2,002 of 9,004 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.67 · 27.7% (2,490 of 9,004 decks)
- Beanstalk Wurm // Plant Beans relevance 0.66 · 15.2% (1,373 of 9,004 decks)
- Stonehoof Chieftain relevance 0.66 · 19.6% (1,769 of 9,004 decks)
- Dirtcowl Wurm relevance 0.66 · 13.5% (1,213 of 9,004 decks)
- Bramble Wurm relevance 0.65 · 14.3% (1,288 of 9,004 decks)
- Balustrade Wurm relevance 0.64 · 13.8% (1,243 of 9,004 decks)
- Saruli Caretaker relevance 0.63 · 14.6% (1,311 of 9,004 decks)
- Loam Dryad relevance 0.62 · 14.2% (1,280 of 9,004 decks)
- Giant Adephage relevance 0.61 · 16.8% (1,517 of 9,004 decks)
- Defiler of Vigor relevance 0.60 · 28.0% (2,520 of 9,004 decks)
- Greater Sandwurm relevance 0.60 · 12.4% (1,112 of 9,004 decks)
- Giant Ankheg relevance 0.57 · 15.4% (1,391 of 9,004 decks)
- Grothama, All-Devouring relevance 0.57 · 13.8% (1,242 of 9,004 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.56 · 29.6% (2,668 of 9,004 decks)
- Dawnglade Regent relevance 0.55 · 14.7% (1,320 of 9,004 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.54 · 21.0% (1,893 of 9,004 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.53 · 21.9% (1,974 of 9,004 decks)
- Titan of Industry relevance 0.53 · 16.4% (1,477 of 9,004 decks)
- Fanatic of Rhonas relevance 0.53 · 31.7% (2,851 of 9,004 decks)
- Colossal Rattlewurm relevance 0.52 · 10.7% (965 of 9,004 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.75 · 20.3% (1,831 of 9,004 decks)
- Relic of Legends relevance 0.64 · 15.7% (1,411 of 9,004 decks)
- Sledge-Class Seedship relevance 0.52 · 12.6% (1,137 of 9,004 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.71 · 47.6% (4,282 of 9,004 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.60 · 26.6% (2,399 of 9,004 decks)
- Lurking Predators relevance 0.54 · 15.6% (1,405 of 9,004 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.54 · 26.6% (2,391 of 9,004 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Crush of Wurms relevance 0.59 · 11.7% (1,056 of 9,004 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.79 · 31.1% (2,796 of 9,004 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.62 · 48.0% (4,320 of 9,004 decks)
- Scene of the Crime relevance 0.54 · 12.2% (1,100 of 9,004 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.51 · 38.8% (3,496 of 9,004 decks)
All lands (2)
- Survivors' Encampment relevance 0.72 · 17.9% (1,615 of 9,004 decks)
- Holdout Settlement relevance 0.72 · 17.9% (1,613 of 9,004 decks)
EDH data for Sandwurm Convergence: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 9,004 real decks.